Search

Background Venous ethanol infusion via an occlusive balloon has been used as a bailout approach to treat ablation-refractory ventricular arrhythmias (VAs). Unfavorable venous anatomy (lack of intramural veins at the targeted site or collateral vein–ethanol shunting) limits its efficacy. Blocking collateral flow with a second balloon may optimize myocardial ethanol delivery. Objective The purpose of this study was to validate the “double-balloon” approach to enhance ethanol delivery in cases of unfavorable venous anatomy. Methods Eight patients referred after failed ablations (3 left ventricular [LV] summit, 5 scar-related ventricular tachycardia) underwent endocardial mapping and additional radiofrequency ablation without VA resolution. Coronary veins were mapped using a multipolar catheter or wire, and selective venograms were obtained. The double balloon was used when (1) distal collateral branches shunted flow away from the targeted region; (2) the target vein had optimal signals only proximally; or (3) a large vein was targeted that had multiple branches for a large area of interest. Results Acute successful ethanol infusion myocardial delivery and resolution of VA was accomplished using the posterolateral LV veins (n = 2 patients, 3 procedures), lateral LV vein (n = 1), apical anterior interventricular vein (AIV; n = 1), middle cardiac vein (n = 1), and septal branches of the AIV (n = 3). At median follow-up of 313.5 days, 2 patients experienced recurrence. Conclusion The double-balloon technique can enhance ethanol delivery to target isolated vein segments, block collateral flow, or target extensive areas, and can expand the utility of venous ethanol for treatment of VAs.

Right ventricular apex pacing for gradient reduction in hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy (HOCM) with severe left ventricular (LV) obstruction has yielded conflicting results.The purpose of this study was to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of biventricular pacing in HOCM.Transvenous biventricular pacing was attempted in 12 severely symptomatic HOCM patients. Optimal intervals were programmed after implant. Echocardiographic LV pressure gradient and synchrony were assessed. LV lead implantation was successful in 9 patients. Optimal pacing mode was biventricular in 6 patients, left ventricular only in 2 patients, and right ventricular only in 1 patient.Functional capacity and quality of life progressively improved. New York Heart Association functional class decreased from 3.2 ± 0.4 at baseline to 1.9 ± 0.3 at 3 months and to 1.4 ± 0.5 at 1 year (P.05); 6-minute walk test increased from 349 ± 116 m at baseline to 454 ± 144 m at 3 months and to 517 ± 206 m (P.05); and quality of life increased from 54 ± 16 points at baseline to 28 ± 13 points at 3 months and 27 ± 15 points at 1 year (P.05). There was also a progressive reduction in LV gradient from 74 ± 23 mmHg at baseline to 50 ± 27 mmHg acutely, 40 ± 26 mmHg at 3 months, and 28 ± 17 mmHg at 1 year (P.05). Gradient reduction was associated with diminished peak longitudinal displacement of the LV septum and earlier displacement of the lateral wall. A progressive reduction of LV mass was observed, from 356 ± 110 g at baseline to 315 ± 70 g at 3 months (P = .13) and to 284 ± 42 g at 1 year (P.05).Biventricular pacing is feasible and usually the best configuration for gradient reduction in HOCM. Biventricular pacing reduces LV hypertrophy.