Search

Competing Interests: Disclosures The authors have no conflicts to disclose.

Background: Abnormal ventricular signals (AVS) are the cornerstone of substrate-based ventricular tachycardia (VT) ablation in sinus rhythm. Signal characterization of AVS in ischemic and nonischemic cardiomyopathies has never been performed., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe ventricular signal abnormalities in 3 different pathologies and examine their association with the diastolic component of VT circuits., Methods: A total of 45 patients (15 ischemic cardiomyopathy [ICM], 15 arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy [ACM], 15 dilated cardiomyopathy [DCM]) who had undergone VT ablation with >50% of the diastolic pathway of the VT circuit recorded were studied. AVS were classified into late potentials (LPs) and continuous fractionated ventricular signals (CFVS), and their characteristics and correlation with the diastolic pathway of VT circuits were analyzed., Results: Seventy-five VT circuits were analyzed. Bipolar scars were greatest in ICM endocardially (53 cm 2 ICM vs 36 cm 2 ACM vs 25 cm 2 DCM; P = .010) and in ACM epicardially (98 cm 2 ACM vs 25 cm 2 ICM vs 24 cm 2 DCM; P = .005). Location of the VT diastolic interval coincided with AVS location in 54% of VTs in ICM, 89% in ACM, and 72% in DCM (P = .036). There was a trend toward a greater association of diastolic intervals coinciding with LPs than with CFVS (78% vs 57%; P = .052) (69% diastolic intervals in ICM coincided with LPs, 33% with CFVS; P = .063). All patients (100%) with CFVS in ACM had VT diastolic components arising from CFVS (33% ICM, 64% DCM; P = .049). Positive predictive value for LPs vs CFVS was 77.8% vs 56.7%, and sensitivity was 67.3% vs 32.7%, respectively., Conclusion: The nature of abnormal signals in different cardiomyopathies reflects underlying pathology. LPs rather than CFVS seem to be more linked to diastolic components of VT circuits, especially in ICM. LPs have greater sensitivity and specificity for VT; however, CFVS may be of more relevance in ACM., (Copyright © 2022 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Interest has grown in recent years in bipolar radiofrequency ablation (B-RFA). However, indications and outcome in patients with ventricular tachycardia (VT) are still to be defined., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe patient selection, safety and effectiveness of B-RFA, in a pilot cohort study of patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (NIDCM) and drug-refractory VT., Methods: We enrolled 21 patients with NIDCM (mean age 66±10 years; 18/21 (86%) men; left ventricular ejection fraction 35%±14%; 100% redo procedures) scheduled for a B-RFA procedure because of drug-refractory VT of suspected septal (interventricular septum [IVS]) origin. After electroanatomic mapping by using the CARTO®3 system, B-RFA was performed in all patients. Short- and long-term outcomes, including procedural success, major complications, and occurrence of major ventricular arrhythmias (MVAs), were evaluated at 25±8 months of follow-up (FU)., Results: Endocardial mapping showed IVS scar in all patients and extra-IVS in 7 patients (33%). B-RFA was performed at an average power of 33 W, for 60-90 seconds, over a 4.1 cm 2 area, with 13±3 mm distance between catheters tips. The impedance drop was 27±4 Ω. The primary end point of noninducibility of the target clinical VT was obtained in 20 patients (95%). During FU, MVAs were documented in 7 patients (33%). FU MVAs occurred in all (100%) patients with extra-IVS localizations (7 of 7) or inflammatory nonischemic cardiomyopathy etiology (2 of 2). IVS thinning (tip-to-tip catheter distance < 5 mm) represented the only anatomical limitation to B-RFA., Conclusion: B-RFA is feasible in patients with NIDCM and drug-refractory VT of septal origin. Extra-IVS substrate and inflammatory NIDCM etiology were associated with an adverse outcome., (Copyright © 2020 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Women are underrepresented in primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) trials, and data on the benefit of ICD therapy in this subgroup are controversial., Objective: The purpose of this study was to better evaluate the benefit of prophylactic ICD in women by performing a meta-analysis of primary prevention ICD trials that assessed gender differences on the end-points of total mortality, appropriate ICD intervention, and survival benefit of ICD compared with placebo., Methods: PubMed, CENTRAL, and other databases were searched in October 2009. Studies were included only if they examined gender differences in the specified end-points, providing the hazard ratio (HR) obtained in multiple Cox regression analyses, and adjusted for all confounding variables., Results: We retrieved five studies (MADIT-II, MUSTT, SCD-HeFT, DEFINITE, COMPANION) that enrolled 7,229 patients (22% women) with dilated cardiomyopathy (74% ischemic). Compared to men, women had no significant difference in overall mortality (HR 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.67-1.39, P = .84) but experienced significantly less appropriate ICD interventions (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.49-0.82, P < or =.001). The benefit of ICD on mortality was significantly higher in men (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.58-0.78, P <.001) but did not reach statistical significance in women (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.57-1.05, P = .1)., Conclusion: Women enrolled in primary prevention ICD trials have the same mortality compared to men while experiencing significantly less appropriate ICD interventions, thus suggesting a smaller impact of sudden cardiac death on overall mortality in women with dilated cardiomyopathy. These findings may explain the smaller ICD survival benefit among women., (Copyright 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)