Search

Background: Lone atrial fibrillation (AF) is thought to be a benign type or an early stage of the disease., Objective: This study sought to compare the left atrium (LA) substrate using delayed-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI) in patients with lone AF versus those with comorbidities., Methods: Forty of 333 included patients met criteria for lone AF. All patients underwent DE-MRI to quantify atrial fibrosis as a marker for structural remodeling (SRM) and underwent catheter ablation. Based on the degree of SRM, patients were staged into 4 groups: Utah I (≤5% LA wall enhancement), Utah II (>5% to ≤20%), Utah III (>20% to ≤35%), or Utah IV (>35%)., Results: Distribution in Utah I to IV was comparable in patients with lone AF and non-lone AF. In both groups, a number of patients showed extensive SRM. Mean enhancement (14.08 ± 8.94 vs. 16.94 ± 11.37) was not significantly different between the 2 groups (P = .0721). In the lone AF group, catheter ablation was successful in suppressing AF in all of Utah I, 81.82% of Utah II, 62.5% of Utah III, and none of Utah IV patients. Similar results were achieved in the non-lone AF group. Outcome after ablation was significantly dependent on the SRM of the LA (P < .001)., Conclusion: The degree of LA structural remodeling as detected using DE-MRI is independent of AF type and associated comorbidities. Selecting appropriate treatment candidates based on the quality and quantity of atrial fibrosis using DE-MRI would improve procedural outcome and avoid unnecessary intervention., (Copyright © 2010 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation uses radiofrequency (RF) energy to induce thermal damage to the left atrium (LA) in an attempt to isolate AF circuits. This injury can be seen using delayed enhancement magnetic resonance imaging (DE-MRI)., Objective: The purpose of this study was to describe DE-MRI findings of the LA in the acute and chronic stages postablation., Methods: Twenty-five patients were scanned at two time points postablation. The first group (n = 10) underwent DE-MRI at 24 hours and at 3 months. The second group (n = 16) was scanned at 3 months and at 6 or 9 months. One patient had three scans (24 hours, 3 months, 9 months) and was included in both groups. The location and extent of enhancement were then analyzed between both groups., Results: The median change in LA wall injury between 24 hours and 3 months was -6.38% (range -11.7% to 12.58%). The median change in LA wall injury between 3 months and later follow-up was +2.0% (range -4.0% to 6.58%). There appears to be little relationship between the enhancement at 24 hours and 3 months (R(2) = 0.004). In contrast, a strong correlation is seen at 3 months and later follow-up (R(2) = 0.966). Qualitative comparison revealed a stronger qualitative relationship between MRI findings at 3 months and later follow-up than at 24 hours and 3 months., Conclusion: RF-induced scar appears to have formed by 3 months postablation. At 24 hours postablation, DE-MRI enhancement appears consistent with a transient inflammatory response rather than stable LA scar formation.