Search

Objectives: Controversy continues over the optimal revascularisation strategy for patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Clinical characteristics, risk profile, and mortality of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) are thought to differ but there are limited contemporary comparative data., Methods: We compared clinical characteristics, in-hospital and 30-day mortality of 3841 consecutive patients undergoing isolated CABG and 4417 undergoing PCI. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality were determined by multiple logistic regression analysis., Results: CABG patients were older (p<0.01). The CABG group had a higher incidence of diabetes, heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, multi-vessel coronary artery, peripheral vascular and cerebro-vascular disease (all p<0.01). Patients undergoing PCI had a higher incidence of recent myocardial infarction (MI) as the indication for revascularisation (p<0.01). In-hospital and 30-day mortality was 1.8% and 1.7% in the CABG group, and 1.4% and 1.8% in the PCI group, respectively. Independent predictors of 30-day mortality after CABG were age (odds ratio 1.1 per year, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.1), cardiogenic shock (4.10, 1.7-10.5) and previous CABG (6.6, 2.4-17.7). Predictors after PCI were diabetes (2.7, 1.4-5.1), female gender (3.0, 1.6-5.5), renal failure (3.2, 1.2-8.0), MI<24h (4.0, 2.2-7.6), left main intervention (5.4, 1.0-27.7), heart failure (6.0, 2.6-14.0) and cardiogenic shock (11.7, 5.4-25.2)., Conclusions: In contemporary clinical practice, CABG is preferred in patients with multi-vessel coronary and associated non-coronary vascular disease, while PCI is the dominant strategy for acute MI. Despite this, in-hospital and 30-day mortality rates were similar. Predictors of early mortality after CABG differ to those of PCI.

A total of 498 patients underwent open-heart surgery in 2007 with 5 deaths (1%).There was no mortality in 248 patients who had de novo isolated coronary bypass surgery. Major mortality and morbidities were almost exclusively confined to patients over the age of 80 years. The development of new catheter based procedures such as aortic valve replacement is likely to decrease the complication rate and length of hospital stay in this high risk group of patients.

Arterial grafting for coronary artery disease has been practiced routinely at the Epworth Hospital for 20 years. Bilateral versus single internal thoracic artery grafts is associated with improved survival, which progressively increased over the 20 years of post-surgery. The average increase in survival was 15% at 20 years. The question of whether to use the radial artery or the saphenous vein graft as supplementary grafts remains unanswered. Current patency data suggest that there is a marginal advantage of radial artery over saphenous graft patency, particularly between 5 and 10 years after surgery. However, there appears to be improved patency of the saphenous vein when used as a coronary artery bypass with the advent of aspirin, lipid-lowering and anti-hypertensive therapy.

The cardiac surgical programme at Epworth Hospital has performed in excess of 13 000 open-heart surgical procedures between 1981 and 2003. During the audit period (2002) 411 patients underwent open-heart surgery. The 2002 Cardiac Surgical Audit confirms the very high standard of surgery. The goals for the future are to maintain the low complication rate and maintain an efficiency to reduce the financial burden on the hospital, the insurance companies and the health system.

The planned Australian National Cardiac Surgery Database is likely to have a number of positive outcomes, including increased patient satisfaction, improved quality assurance and increased economic efficiency. In relation to cardiac surgery, performance indicators associated with the commonly performed procedure of coronary artery bypass surgery will be used for peer review and to measure outcomes. Several different risk-adjusted models are available for analysing national databases. However, the potential weaknesses of database analysis are lack of both compliance and data validity. A number of other major issues, such as location of the data analysis centre, who will hold authority over data accuracy, and the security of and access to the Database, must also be considered when setting up the National Database. Overall, however, the benefits of a national database will be enormous. Cardiologists and cardiac surgeons will benefit from a disease-based registry with shared common definitions. In addition, the provision of such a database will represent a crucial step towards developing national strategies for treating heart disease.

Background: Angina pectoris has long been recognised as one of the principal symptoms of severe aortic valve stenosis (AS), even in patients without significant coronary artery disease (CAD). However, controversy exists concerning the prevalence of angina pectoris and associated CAD in such patients., Objective: To determine the prevalence of CAD detectable by angiography and its relation to angina pectoris and coronary risk factors in patients with severe AS., Patients and Methods: All patients with symptomatic AS who had undergone aortic valve replacement and preoperative cardiac catheterisation at the Austin and Repatriation Medical Centre between 1 January 1986 and 31 May 1996 were retrospectively analysed. Those patients with multiple valve disease, aortic regurgitation of grade 2 or more in severity, or who had had prior coronary artery or valve surgery were excluded from this analysis., Results: A total of 328 consecutive patients with severe AS (242 men and 86 women; mean age 72 years, range 39-84 years) were studied. Significant CAD (reduction in luminal diameter > or = 50%) was found in 162 patients (49.4%). Typical angina was present in 74.7% of these 162 patients but it was also found in 44.6% of the 166 patients without obstructive CAD. Of the patients without angina (n = 133), 30.8% had significant CAD. By multivariate logistic regression, we have identified seven significant predictors for CAD among severe AS patients. Five factors increased risk. Expressed as odds ratio with 95% confidence interval, these included: (i) age in years (1.07; 1.04-1.11, P = 0.001); (ii) male gender (2.09; 1.14-3.80, P = 0.016); (iii) angina pectoris (3.19; 1.89-5.37, P < 0.001); (iv) history of myocardial infarction (2.87; 1.38-5.97, P = 0.005); and (v) peripheral vascular disease (2.28; 1.28-4.05, P = 0.005). Factors associated with decreased likelihood of CAD were serum high density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (0.58; 0.34-0.71, P = 0.002) and peak systolic gradient across the aortic valve (0.97; 0.95-0.99, P = 0.0113)., Conclusion: Coronary arteriography can probably be omitted for a patient with severe AS if that patient has no symptoms of angina and has no risk factors known to increase its incidence.