Search

The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence of and risk factors for de novo malignancy after heart transplantation (HTx) in a single center. We assessed 102 consecutive patients who received HTx and were followed-up in our center regularly for > 1 year from June 2006 to May 2018. We investigated the incidence of and risk factors for de novo malignancy. The cumulative incidence of each malignancy type during the follow-up period was one (0.98%) for skin cancer, four (3.92%) for nonskin solid organ cancer, and six (5.88%) for posttransplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). The percentage of patients with more than one infectious event ≤ 1 year after HTx was higher in the malignancy group than in the non-malignancy group. Furthermore, Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that the incidence rate of infectious events was higher in patients with malignancies than in those without (log-rank P < 0.001). After dividing malignancies into a PTLD group and a solid organ malignancy group, we found that negative Epstein-Barr virus serostatus, cytomegalovirus-positive antigenemia, and the occurrence of any viral or gastrointestinal infectious event at ≤ 1 year were more frequent in patients with PTLD than in patients without it. The survival rate was significantly lower for patients with solid organ malignancy than for patients without malignancy. In conclusion, there was a correlation between infectious events and de novo malignancy, particularly in patients with PTLD. We should confirm this finding by conducting a larger cohort study.

The precise physiological changes associated with the use of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) are not well characterized. We examined the impact of changes in hemodynamic state using LVAD on endothelial function. We measured flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) to evaluate endothelial vasodilator function of the brachial artery in 53 patients (dilated cardiomyopathy: 39, ischemic cardiomyopathy: 4, and others: 10) with an implanted LVAD (DuraHeart, EVAHEART, or HeartMate II). We found that FMD value in the HeartMateII LVAD group (9.3% ± 2.9%) was significantly higher than those in the other two groups (EVAHEART: 6.7% ± 2.8% and DuraHeart: 6.2% ± 4.0%). Other factors that affected the FMD value were age (r =  - 0.31, p = 0.026), Brinkman index (r =  - 0.30, p = 0.029); however, aortic opening, aortic regurgitation, and other hemodynamic parameters such as cardiac index or pulmonary capillary wedge pressure did not correlate with FMD. Multivariate analyses revealed that the difference among the LVAD models most significantly affected the FMD values after adjusting for age and smoking status (t = 2.6, p = 0.014). Event free survival rate of death and cerebral infarction was not significantly different according to the value of FMD. The difference among the LVAD groups most significantly affected the state of endothelial function and it had more impact than other clinical factors.