Search

Atrial tachycardia (AT) and atrial fibrillation (AF) commonly occur after cardiac surgeries (CSs). This study investigated the mechanisms and long-term outcomes of AT and AF ablation after various Maze procedures, particularly whether atrial tachyarrhythmias after the Maze procedure occur due to gaps in the Maze lines. We analyzed 37 consecutive cases with atrial tachyarrhythmias after the Maze procedures and concomitant CSs between 2007 and 2019. Fifty-nine atrial tachyarrhythmias were induced in 37 consecutive cases, and 49 of those atrial tachyarrhythmias were mappable ATs. Forty ATs were related to the Maze procedures in the 49 mappable ATs (81.6%). All 37 consecutive cases had residual electrical conductions (gaps) in the Maze lines (88 gaps; 2.4 ± 1.2 gaps/patient). Forty of 88 gaps (45.5%) were associated with gap-related ATs. The common ATs in this study were 1. peri-mitral atrial flutter due to gaps at pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) line to mitral valve annulus (MVA) (20 cases), and 2. peri-tricuspid atrial flutter due to gaps at right atrial incision to the tricuspid valve annulus (TVA) (10 cases). Forty-seven of 49 ATs (95.9%) were successfully ablated at the first session, and there were no complications. The mean follow-up period after ablation was 3.6 ± 3.2 (median, 2.1; interquartile range, 0.89–6.84) years. The Kaplan–Meier analysis of freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmias after Maze procedure was 82.7% at 1-year follow-up and 75.5% at 4-year follow-up after a single procedure. Reentry was the main mechanism of ATs after Maze procedures and concomitant CSs, and ATs were largely related to the gaps on the Maze lines between the PVI line and the MVA or those on the lines between right atrial incision to the TVA. Long-term follow-up data suggest that catheter ablation of atrial tachyarrhythmias after various Maze procedures is effective and safe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Donor and recipient characteristics, as well as donor-recipient matching, affect clinical outcomes after heart transplantation (HTx). This study aimed to clarify how donor and recipient characteristics affect the clinical course after HTx. The medical records of all the patients who underwent HTx at the National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center from 1999 to 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. Sixty-one patients (48 males) underwent HTx. Six recipients (9.8 %) developed primary graft dysfunction (PGD) determined by criteria recently established at a consensus conference. Development of PGD was associated with high-dose inotropic support for the donor heart and a history of stroke in the recipient ( p = 0.04 and p = 0.002, respectively). Recipients with PGD had higher right atrial pressure (RAP) and lower cardiac output (CO) compared with those without PGD at 6 months after HTx (RAP, 6.8 ± 3.6 vs. 2.8 ± 2.2 mmHg, p < 0.001; CO, 4.6 ± 0.8 l vs. 5.8 ± 1.2 l/min, p = 0.02). With respect to survival, patients with PGD had a 5-year survival rate equivalent to those without PGD (83.3 vs. 93.3 %, p = 0.23). High-dose inotropic support for the donor heart and a history of stroke in the recipient are significant predictive factors for the development of PGD. However, recipients with PGD demonstrate mid-term survival comparable to those without PGD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]