Search

Background: Stent thrombosis (ST) is an uncommon but serious complication of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The reported rate of definite ST with new generation drug-eluting stents ranges from 0.5 to 1% at 30 days. We aimed to examine the incidence and outcomes of ST in a real-world setting.Methods: The Victorian Cardiac Outcomes Registry was established in 2012 as a state-wide clinical quality registry, with all PCI capable centres contributing in 2017. Data were collected on 41,137 consecutive PCI procedures from 2013 to 2017. We describe the patient characteristics and clinical outcomes in definite and probable ST at 30 days.Results: Stent thrombosis occurred in 225 patients (0.55%). Compared to patients without ST, these patients were more likely to be female (32.0% vs 23.4%, p≤0.01) and have a history of diabetes (28.6% vs 21.9%, p=0.02). ST was more common in patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (14.9% vs 4.6%, p<0.001) and in patients presenting with ST-elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest for their index PCI (all p<0.001). Dual antiplatelet therapy at 30 days was less frequent in patients with ST (84.8% vs 92.0%, p<0.001), while 30-day mortality was more common: 23.6% versus 2.0% (p<0.001).Conclusions: Even with contemporary stents and adjunctive medications, ST still occurs following 1 in 200 PCIs, and is associated with increased mortality at 30 days. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Postoperative serum troponin levels and perioperative myocardial infarction (MI) rates correlate with mortality and morbidity following cardiac surgery. The objective of this study was to document the release profile of high sensitivity troponin T (hsTnT) following different cardiac operations.Methods: Patients undergoing one of five different isolated cardiac surgical procedures (eligible preoperative hsTnT <29ng/L, serum creatinine < 0.2mmol/L) were recruited prospectively. Serum hsTnT was measured at 0, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 24 and 72hours after the first surgical insult to myocardium, together with daily electrocardiographs.Results: There were 10 patients in the on-pump coronary artery bypass group and 5 each in the remaining groups (off-pump coronary artery bypass, open aortic valve replacement, transcutaneous aortic valve implantation and mitral valve replacement). Five additional patients were excluded due to perioperative MI or renal failure. Median [range] of peak hsTnT was 241[99-566], 64[50-136], 353[307-902], 115[112-275], and 918[604-1166] ng/L, respectively. Operations with the lowest peak hsTnT values peaked earliest (four hours) while those with highest values peaked latest (eight hours).Conclusion: After cardiac surgery, the hsTnT profile peaks four to eight hours after the initial surgical insult. The magnitude and timing of the peak correlates to the expected degree of surgically-induced myocardial injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Transradial approach (TRA) is now considered the standard of care in many centres for elective and primary percutaneous intervention (PCI). The use of the radial approach in ST segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients has been associated with a significant reduction in major adverse cardiac events. However, it is still unclear if the side of radial access (right vs. left) has impact on safety and effectiveness of TRA in primary PCI. So this study was conducted to compare the safety, feasibility, and outcomes of right radial access (RRA) vs. left radial access (LRA) in the setting of primary PCI.Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of 400 consecutive patients presenting to our institution with STEMI for whom primary PCIs were performed via RRA and LRA.Results: Mean age of the whole studied population was 57±12.8 years, with male predominance (77.2%). There were 202 cases in the RRA group and 198 in the LRA group, with no significant difference in demographics and clinical characteristics for patients included in both groups. There was no significant difference in procedure success rate (97.5% for RRA vs. 98.4% for LRA; P=0.77). In addition, no significant difference between both approaches was observed in the contrast volume, number of catheters, fluoroscopy time (FT), needle-to-balloon time, post-procedure vascular complications, in hospital reinfarction, stroke/transient ischaemic attack (TIA) or death.Conclusion: Right radial access and LRA are equally safe and effective in the setting of primary PCI. Both approaches have a high success rate and comparable needle-to-balloon time. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Cohort studies of STEMI patients have reported that over 30% receive no reperfusion. Barriers to greater use of reperfusion in STEMI patients require further elucidation.Methods: We collected data on STEMI patients with no reperfusion as part of the SNAPSHOT ACS Registry, which recruited consecutive ACS patients in 478 hospitals throughout Australia and New Zealand during 14-27 May 2012.Results: Of 4387 patients enrolled, 419 were diagnosed with STEMI. Primary PCI (PPCI) was performed in 160 (38.2%), fibrinolysis was used in 105 (25.1%), and 154 (36.7%) had no reperfusion. Patients with no reperfusion had a mean age of 70.3±15.0 years compared with 63.1±13.5 in the reperfusion group (p<0.0001). There were more females in the no reperfusion group (37.1% v 23.0% p=0.002) and they were significantly more likely to have prior PCI or CABG, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney disease and other vascular disease, and to be nursing home residents (all p<0.05). Patients without reperfusion had a significantly higher mortality in hospital (11.7% v 4.9%, p=0.011). In 370 patients who presented within 12hours, 28 had early angiography without PCI, which was considered an attempt at reperfusion. Therefore reperfusion was attempted in 293 of 370 eligible patients (79.2%).Conclusion: Of consecutive STEMI patients, 36.7% did not receive any reperfusion and they had a higher risk of death in hospital. In eligible patients, reperfusion was attempted in 79.2%. National strategies to encourage earlier medical contact and greater use of reperfusion in eligible patients may lead to better outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]