Search

Early (ABRs) and middle (MLRs) surface-recorded auditory evoked potentials were compared in eight adult monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and eight adult humans. Responses whose probable generators were the cochlear nucleus and lateral lemniscus were of shorter latency and larger amplitude in monkeys. Relative to humans, ABR response latencies in monkeys were less affected by stimulus intensity, stimulus rate, and masker level. In contrast, monkey amplitudes were relatively more affected by those same stimulus parameters. The most prominent MLR wave was longer in latency and greater in amplitude in humans than the homologous wave in monkeys. The reduction in amplitude of that wave with increasing rate was greater for humans than monkeys. Temporal interactions (the effect of prior stimuli on the response to current stimulation) were investigated from a non-linear systems identification framework using maximum length sequences (MLSs). Both monkey and human auditory systems were second and probably third-order systems at the levels assessed. As the separations between the stimulus pulses decreased, evidence for temporal interactions became more prominent, reached a maximum, and then decreased with further decreases in stimulus pulse separation. At the highest stimulus rates presented, variations in temporal spacing among stimuli had less of an effect on monkey than human evoked responses.

Distortion product otoacoustic emissions (DPOAEs) were compared in eight rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta) and eight normal hearing humans. DPOAEs were recorded in three conditions. In the first condition, DPOAEgrams were generated for monkeys and humans from approximately f2 = 0.5-20 kHz. Monkeys had larger amplitude DPOAEs at all frequencies except around f2 = 1 kHz. In the second condition, DPOAE amplitudes increased and then decreased as the separation between the primaries increased. These functions were similar in the two species except at the lowest frequencies assessed. In the third condition, the levels of the primaries were varied independently. Monkeys had steeper input/output (I/O) functions than humans. The slopes of DPOAE I/O functions increased with frequency in both species. When the levels of both primaries were increased simultaneously, DPOAE I/O functions were well described by power functions throughout the intensity range assessed (from threshold to 65 dB SPL). Monkey I/O functions tended to be expansive power functions at all but the lowest frequencies, while human I/O functions tended to be compressive power functions except at the highest frequencies assessed. Other differences in I/O functions f2 = 8 kHz may indicate species specific differences at high (for human) frequencies.