1. Contralateral routing of signals disrupts monaural level and spectral cues to sound localisation on the horizontal plane
- Author
-
Pádraig T. Kitterick and Adam J. Pedley
- Subjects
Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Microphone ,Computer science ,Deafness ,Audiology ,Monaural ,Signal ,Contralateral routing of signals (CROS) ,Monaural spectral cues ,Young Adult ,03 medical and health sciences ,Hearing Aids ,Spatial Processing ,0302 clinical medicine ,Hearing ,otorhinolaryngologic diseases ,medicine ,Humans ,Sound Localization ,Ear canal ,030223 otorhinolaryngology ,Sound (medical instrument) ,Monaural level cues ,Auditory Threshold ,Equipment Design ,White noise ,Horizontal plane ,medicine.disease ,Electric Stimulation ,Sensory Systems ,Persons With Hearing Impairments ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Acoustic Stimulation ,Unilateral deafness ,Audiometry, Pure-Tone ,Female ,Cues ,Unilateral hearing loss ,Monaural localisation ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Research Paper - Abstract
Objectives Contra-lateral routing of signals (CROS) devices re-route sound between the deaf and hearing ears of unilaterally-deaf individuals. This rerouting would be expected to disrupt access to monaural level cues that can support monaural localisation in the horizontal plane. However, such a detrimental effect has not been confirmed by clinical studies of CROS use. The present study aimed to exercise strict experimental control over the availability of monaural cues to localisation in the horizontal plane and the fitting of the CROS device to assess whether signal routing can impair the ability to locate sources of sound and, if so, whether CROS selectively disrupts monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal location, or both. Design Unilateral deafness and CROS device use were simulated in twelve normal hearing participants. Monaural recordings of broadband white noise presented from three spatial locations (−60°, 0°, and +60°) were made in the ear canal of a model listener using a probe microphone with and without a CROS device. The recordings were presented to participants via an insert earphone placed in their right ear. The recordings were processed to disrupt either monaural level or spectral cues to horizontal sound location by roving presentation level or the energy across adjacent frequency bands, respectively. Localisation ability was assessed using a three-alternative forced-choice spatial discrimination task. Results Participants localised above chance levels in all conditions. Spatial discrimination accuracy was poorer when participants only had access to monaural spectral cues compared to when monaural level cues were available. CROS use impaired localisation significantly regardless of whether level or spectral cues were available. For both cues, signal re-routing had a detrimental effect on the ability to localise sounds originating from the side of the deaf ear (−60°). CROS use also impaired the ability to use level cues to localise sounds originating from straight ahead (0°). Conclusions The re-routing of sounds can restrict access to the monaural cues that provide a basis for determining sound location in the horizontal plane. Perhaps encouragingly, the results suggest that both monaural level and spectral cues may not be disrupted entirely by signal re-routing and that it may still be possible to reliably identify sounds originating on the hearing side., Highlights • Rerouting sounds from a deaf ear to a hearing ear impairs monaural localisation. • Distinct effects of rerouting were observed on monaural level and spectral cues. • Rerouting disrupts level cues distinguishing sounds at 0° azimuth and at the deaf ear. • Rerouting selectively disrupts spectral cues that identify sounds at the deaf ear.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF