Search

Background/Objectives: Pain is a complex and subjective experience influenced by psychological, cultural, and social factors. This study aims to investigate how social perceptions of pain affect the lived experiences and coping mechanisms of individuals suffering from pain. By comparing public discourse with the experiences of sufferers, we explore whether the social legitimacy of pain influences how it is managed. Methods: A multi-phase qualitative study was conducted, comprising eight focus groups with members of the Spanish general population and 19 in-depth interviews with individuals suffering from various types of pain. The focus groups explored social perceptions of pain's legitimacy, while the interviews delved into the sufferers' personal experiences. The data were analyzed using thematic analysis to identify patterns and disparities between public discourse and individual narratives. Results: The focus groups revealed widespread social empathy towards all types of pain. However, interviewees reported significant social pressure to normalize their behavior and downplay their pain. Many felt misunderstood, unsupported, and stigmatized, especially in environments where they held subordinate roles, such as the workplace or healthcare settings. Sufferers often resorted to silence or isolation to avoid judgment. Conclusions: While Spanish society outwardly legitimizes all forms of pain, sufferers experience significant discrepancies between public empathy and actual social support. The findings suggest that raising awareness alone is insufficient, and that structural changes are needed to address the daily burdens that individuals face when coping with pain, particularly in workplace and healthcare environments. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pain is a subjective experience that is mediated by the social structure and by the contextual aspects of people in pain. From the point of view of those affected, a sociological analysis has been carried out of why society doubts pain and the impact that the lack of credibility has on people in pain. Qualitative methodology is used. In total, 19 semi-structured interviews have been conducted with men and women in pain. Research has shown that pain produces discredit in all dimensions of individual's social life, from the most intimate to that related to healthcare and production. The lack of credibility takes the form of epistemic injustice, being a reaction produced from the social structure to avoid the impacts that pain could produce on the social system. Epistemic injustice affects anyone in pain, but the form it takes will be related to sufferer's circumstances. Studying this topic is important because it shows the rigidity of expert systems to deal with some old and new situations related to pain. It also shows the frequent lack of fit between the systems and the sufferers. Finally, the article shows that to deal unfairly with the testimony of people in pain has negative consequences on the treatment of pain. A better understanding of these issues could improve the sufferers' living conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Pain is a perception conditioned both by the subjective experience of the sufferer and their social context. A preliminary literature search suggests that, today, information about the social legitimacy of pain is scarce, although it is known that this phenomenon is an element that is closely linked to the type of pain and contributes to the sufferer's experience. Thus, our objective is to explore how the social legitimacy of pain is tackled in the scientific literature. Methods: This study is a protocol for a systematic literature review where six databases were reviewed: Pubmed, Web of Science, Scielo, Scopus, PsycInfo, and CINAHL, were searched for papers dealing with the social legitimacy of pain from any discipline/study design. The obtained papers will be exported to Zotero, where the duplicates will be deleted. Later, the studies of interest will be selected, first on the basis of their titles/abstracts, and, later, on the complete text. This process will be carried out in pairs. Finally, the data of interest will be extracted, analyzing their quality, to finally make a qualitative analysis of the results. Discussion: This will be the first review to systematically explore the available evidence on the social legitimacy of pain. Therefore, it will be able, not only to extend the theoretical knowledge on this phenomenon, but also to extend its visibility, which will make it possible for the social legitimacy of pain to be studied from different disciplines and fields, thus improving the way it is approached. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Relocation is a very important event in people's lives in general, but really significant in old age. However, some predictors of relocation still need to be improved. The objective of this review was to synthesize qualitative evidence to understand the reasons of the participants to decide on the place of care of the older people. Methods: Systematic review of qualitative studies was conducted in six databases: Scopus, SciELO, PubMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science and CINAHL, from its beginning until 29 November 2017. Qualitative or mixed studies, written in English or Spanish and addressing the decision-making process (already experienced by participants) on the place of care of older persons (65 years or older), were included in the review. PROSPERO (registration number: CRD42018084826). Results: A total of 46 articles were finally included in the analysis. Our main result is the distinction of multiple reasons for each population group involved in the decision-making process, ranking these reasons into three factors: Retention, pull and push. Conclusion: This differentiation allows for a more detailed and in-depth analysis of the motivations of the different groups involved in this process. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]