Search

Recent political processes have rendered people with dementia an increasingly surveilled population. Surveillance is a contentious issue within dementia research, spanning technological monitoring, biomarker research and epidemiological data gathering. This paper explores surveillance in the relationships of people affected by dementia, how older relatives both with and without diagnoses are surveilled in everyday interactions, and the importance of expectations in guiding surveillance. This paper presents data from 41 in-depth interviews with people affected by dementia living in the community in the United Kingdom. Agedness was a key contributor to expectations that a person may have dementia, based on previous experiences, media accounts and wider awareness. Expectations provoked surveillance in interactions, with participants looking for signs of dementia when interacting with older relatives. Older people also enacted self-surveillance, monitoring their own behaviour. Various actions could be attributed to dementia because interpretation is malleable, partly vindicating expectations while leaving some uncertainties. Expectant surveillance transformed people's experiences because they organised their own actions, and interpreted those of others, in line with pre-existing meanings. The ability to interpret behaviours to fit expectations can bring coherence to uncertainties of ageing, cognition and dementia, but risks ascribing dementia to many older people who straddle those uncertainties. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

An introduction to the articles within the issue of the journal on topics including need post-structuralist concerns of Deleuze and Guattari, sociological commentary on new developments in drugs and historical perspective on the development of anorexia nervosa, is presented.

This essay critically examines the process of governmentality as revealed in the construction and resistance to the categorisation and classification of ‘Healthy Senior Citizenship’. This also includes an illustrative analysis of data from a national UK qualitative interview study of the input into the policy process of older adults in voluntary and community organisations. The paper demonstrates how governmentality finds its expression within the construction of healthy senior citizenship as synonymous with activity and participation within the technologies of collaboration and consultation. The conclusion reflects upon developing a critical sociology of old age in order to scrutinize conceptions of the ‘problems’ of governing an ageing population in post-welfarist or advanced liberal states. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ageing of the HIV population is unfolding within the context of a politicised history of medical care, medical breakthroughs changing HIV from a fatal to a chronic illness, and a long-standing treatment partnership between medical professionals and HIV patients. This article draws on in-depth interviews with those living with HIV in later life (aged 50 and over), as well as those working with them, to uncover how these various actors understand the nature and consequences of this new phenomenon, and whether their understandings and approaches vary according to the individual's connection to it. All informants described the interaction between ageing and HIV as complex and incompletely understood, and accounted for their own uncertainties about this interplay as due to a global knowledge gap produced by the novelty of ageing with HIV. In these data, working in the area of, or being personally affected by, ageing with HIV emerged as 'experiments in living,' with those variously involved in the phenomenon forced to take tentative, exploratory steps while navigating 'uncharted territory.' Yet, the poorly-understood nature of the ageing/HIV interplay was framed differently, with clinicians and scientists constructing it as a temporary gap in technical knowledge (a scientific puzzle), and non-medical stakeholders and older people living with HIV describing it as an anxiety-provoking source of chronic uncertainty permeating daily life. These differences and similarities can help us to reformulate what medical sociology has often constructed as a static 'gulf' between the clinical and the lifeworlds as, instead, gravitational pulls towards clinical and experiential dimensions of chronic illness as it unfolds in later life. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]