Search

Computed tomography (CT) is a crucial element of medical imaging diagnostics. The widespread application of this technology has made CT one of the major contributors to medical radiation burden, despite the fact that doses per individual CT scan steadily decrease due to the advancement of technology. Epidemiological risk assessment of CT exposure is hampered by the fact that moderate adverse effects triggered by low doses of CT exposure are likely masked by statistical fluctuations. In light of these limitations, there is need of further insights into the biological processes induced by CT scans to complement the existing knowledge base of risk assessment. This prompted us to investigate the early transcriptomic response of ex vivo irradiated peripheral blood of three healthy individuals. Samples were irradiated employing a modern dual-source-CT-scanner with a tube voltage of 150 kV, resulting in an estimated effective dose of 9.6 mSv. RNA was isolated 1 h and 6 h after exposure, respectively, and subsequently analyzed by RNA deep sequencing. Differential gene expression analysis revealed shared upregulation of AEN, FDXR, and DDB2 6 h after exposure in all three probands. All three genes have previously been discussed as radiation responsive genes and have already been implicated in DNA damage response and cell cycle control after DNA damage. In summary, we substantiated the usefulness of AEN, FDXR, and DDB2 as RNA markers of low dose irradiation. Moreover, the upregulation of genes associated with DNA damage reminds one of the genotoxic nature of CT diagnostics even with the low doses currently applied.

Latest advantages in computed tomography (CT) come with enhanced diagnostic imaging and also sophisticated dose reduction techniques. However, overall exposure to ionizing radiation of patients in Germany rises slightly, which is mainly based on the growing number of performed CT scans. Furthermore, new possibilities in modern imaging, including 4D scans or perfusion protocols, offer new medical insights but require additional scans.In this study, we reevaluated data sets from patients undergoing CT examinations because of suspected pulmonary embolism and compared doses and diagnostic results of the standard protocol to the additional modern CT subtraction technique. Two groups of single-blinded radiologists were provided with CT data sets from 50 patients. One group (G1) had access to full datasets including CT subtraction with perfusion map. The other group (G2) only evaluated conventional CT angiography. Results were compared to final clinical diagnosis. Dose length product (DLP) of CT angiography was compared to CT subtraction technique, which consists of an additional non-contrast-enhanced scan and perfusion map. Effective dose was calculated using a Monte Carlo simulation-based software tool (ImpactDose). Inter-rater agreement of both groups was strong in G1 with κ = .896 and minimal in G2 (κ = .307). Agreement to final diagnosis was strong in both groups (G1, κ = .848; G2, κ = .767). Doses applied using the CT subtraction technique were 34.8% higher than for CT angiography alone (G1 DLP 337.6 ± 171.3 mGy x cm; G2 DLP 220.2 ± 192.8 mGy x cm; p < .001). Calculated effective dose was therefore significantly higher for G1 (G1 4.82 ± 2.20 mSv; G2 3.04 ± 1.33 mSv; p < .001). Our results indicate a benefit of the CT subtraction technique for the detection of pulmonary embolisms in clinical routine, accompanied by an increase in the dose administered. Although CT protocols should always be applied carefully to specific clinical indications in order to maximize the potential for dose reduction and keep the administered dose as low as reasonably achievable, one should never lose sight of the diagnostic benefit, especially in vital clinical indications.

Concern about the threat of a terrorist attack with a Radiological Dispersal Device has increased considerably over the last few years, and this comes along with an immense challenge, especially regarding medical treatment of combined injuries with incorporated radioactive fragments. In such scenarios, the identification and surgical exploration of radioactive fragments is a major issue to prevent further radiation-induced effects like wound healing disorders, onset of acute radiation syndrome, and as a late-effect cancer. However, in a usual emergency setting, it is unclear how this task can be achieved. Within this study, we evaluated the feasibility of different radiological methods to identify and locate an incorporated radioactive fragment. We placed two different Cs sources and several non-radioactive fragments representing sham control samples within a human spine phantom. Standard emergency imaging procedures were performed, including plane radiography and different CT scans (64 row, 384 row dual energy, 320 row without iterative metal artifact reduction), respectively. Eight radiologists were blinded toward the results and asked to identify the radioactive fragments within the provided images. For both sources, correct identification was rather low (15.63%). Furthermore, none of the questioned radiologists (N = 0) stated that they were able to identify the radioactive shrapnel distinctly. Positive predictive value was accordingly low (15.63%). Most participants recommended a scintigraphy-based technique for identification (26.67%) rather than radiographic procedures (6.67%). Identification and location of incorporated small radioactive fragments with low energies by standard radiological procedures prior to surgical exploration is not promising. Nevertheless, procedures that can achieve this aim are needed direly in the case of a terrorist attack with a radiological dispersal device and should be available in an emergency department.