1. Inside, outside and in‐between: The process and impact of co‐producing knowledge about autism in a UK Somali community
- Author
-
Fiona Fox, Dheeraj Rai, Nura Aabe, and Sabi Redwood
- Subjects
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice ,knowledge ,Somalia ,Community organization ,participatory ,autism ,Participatory action research ,Somali ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Reciprocity (social psychology) ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Sociology ,Autistic Disorder ,Cooperative Behavior ,lcsh:R5-920 ,research ,Information Dissemination ,co‐production ,business.industry ,lcsh:Public aspects of medicine ,030503 health policy & services ,Social change ,Community Participation ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,lcsh:RA1-1270 ,Citizen journalism ,co‐researchers ,Public relations ,16. Peace & justice ,United Kingdom ,language.human_language ,Original Research Paper ,co-production ,Transformative learning ,Research Design ,qualitative ,impact ,language ,community ,co-researchers ,lcsh:Medicine (General) ,0305 other medical science ,business ,Original Research Papers ,Qualitative research - Abstract
BackgroundCo‐production is predicated on equal power‐sharing and responsibility in research partnerships. However, relatively few accounts exist that explore the subjective experience of how co‐researchers achieve such equality, from the perspectives of public contributors and researchers.AimThis paper aims to provide a unique insight into the process of co‐production, by weaving personal reflections with principles to evaluate the impact arising from co‐produced knowledge. It is based upon participatory research that was initiated by a ‘lay’ person, on behalf of a community organization, seeking support for Somali families who are affected by autism. The paper explores the evolving partnerships that began with community theatre and qualitative research and leading to extensive dissemination and impact, all of which has been jointly owned and negotiated by the co‐researchers and community organizations.DiscussionInitially, this paper reflects on the process, drawing on principles defined for co‐production in health research and combining it with the co‐researcher's personal reflections of their experiences as insiders and outsiders, stepping in and out of each other's worlds. The value of reciprocity, flexibility and continuous reflection is illustrated. The latter part of the paper explores the impact of this co‐produced knowledge using a theoretical framework, to assess the specific impacts and its broader transformative potential. It demonstrates how (1) opportunities for all partners to be equitably involved to the maximum degree possible throughout the research process can affect social change and (2) co‐produced research can become a catalyst that is dynamic and complex, achieving multi‐layered impact.
- Published
- 2019