Search

Chronic pain is common in older people. However, little is known about how pain is experienced in residents of retirement villages ('villages'), and how pain intensity and associations are experienced in relation to characteristics of residents and village living. We thus aimed to examine pain levels, prevalence and associated factors in village residents. The current paper is a cross‐sectional analysis of baseline data from the 'Older People in Retirement Villages' study in Auckland, New Zealand. Between July 2016 and August 2018, 578 village residents were interviewed face‐to‐face by gerontology nurse specialists, using interRAI Community Health Assessment (CHA) and customised survey. We used a validated pain scale and multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusted for pre‐specified confounders. Residents' median age was 82 years; 420 (73%) were female; 270 (47%) exhibited/reported daily pain, and in 11% this was severe. After controlling for confounders, daily pain was positively associated with self‐reported arthritis (OR = 3.88, 95% CI = 2.57–5.87), poor/fair self‐reported health (OR = 3.19, 95% CI = 1.29–7.93), having no health clinic on‐site (OR = 1.76, 95% CI = 1.10–2.83), and minimal fatigue (diminished energy but completes normal day‐to‐day activities) (OR = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.11–2.81). Similar associations were observed for levels of pain. We conclude that levels of pain and prevalence of daily pain are high in village residents. Self‐reported arthritis, self‐reported poor/fair health, no health clinic on‐site and minimal fatigue are all independently associated with a higher risk of daily pain and with levels of pain. This study suggests potential opportunities for villages to better provide on‐site support to decrease prevalence and severity of pain for their residents, and thus potentially increase wellbeing and quality‐of‐life, though as we cannot prove causality, more research is needed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ageing in place initiatives that aim to keep older people out of hospitals and rest homes and in their own homes for longer have been at the forefront of aged care policy since the early 1990s. The success of these policies depends largely on the availability of a suitable home environment, a supportive social network and regular assessment to detect changes in the older person's health status and needs for support. The BRIGHT Trial was a randomised control trial investigating the effectiveness of introducing case finding in primary care settings to detect unmet need and risk of disability among older people. We used baseline questionnaire data collected in 2008-2009 from 3753 community-dwelling older people to estimate and describe use and need for additional personal assistance. Logistic regression was used to identify the most important predictors of reporting some need for support and unmet need. Eighty-one per cent of participants required support with at least one instrumental activity of daily living. Sixty-six per cent were meeting their needs with the support they were currently receiving. Unmet need was most frequently reported for heavy housework (65%) and light housework (53%). While spouses, family members and friends were the main providers of support for light housework, meal preparation, shopping, finances and transportation, paid staff most frequently provided personal care and heavy housework assistance. Reporting mobility difficulty ( OR = 3.5), identifying as a care provider ( OR = 1.7) and being female ( OR = 1.9) were all significant predictors of some need for assistance as well as unmet need for assistance ( OR = 2.5, 1.7 and 1.7 respectively). The findings highlight the importance of regular needs assessment for older people living in the community particularly, given the reliance on spousal support for the majority of activities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]