Search

Hoarded homes can pose a threat to public safety, with heightened risks of fire hazards, pest infestations and noxious odours in both the home and neighbouring dwellings. Communities across North America are responding to these public safety concerns through a harm reduction approach. This descriptive study explores the implementation and outcomes of the City of Vancouver's approach involving a partnership between fire prevention and public health. Data were collected from the team's 2016–2018 case tracking systems, consisting of health records and team intervention record, as well as notes taken from case briefing meetings. Study objectives included describing the intervention model, providing descriptive statistics on clients and their clutter volume, the interventions undertaken, and exploring predictors of clutter volume and case outcome through exploratory analyses. The sample included 82 cases involving severely hoarded conditions or more moderate hoarding conditions paired with additional client vulnerabilities (e.g. health conditions, frailty). Results from paired samples t‐tests and regression analysis, suggest the Hoarding Action Response Team's (HART) model of a community‐based intervention for hoarding was associated with clutter reduction and tenancy preservation. HART successfully maintained engagement with most clients, and most cases were closed within six home visits. Despite these successes, the team dealt with several barriers including client avoidance and limited resources. This paper provides guidance for communities who are working to develop a coordinated response to problems associated with hoarding and begins to establish expectations for what can be achieved through a community‐based hoarding intervention model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Australian health and aged care reforms mandate a wellness and reablement (W&R) approach with services and the workforce needing to adjust their way of working with older people, to actively promote independence and participation in life's activities. Studies exploring the older person's perspective are sparse. This study aims to understand the older person's experience of a W&R approach, supplemented with experiences of staff trained in the approach. The study evaluates a W&R approach implemented across three community‐based sites of a large Australian aged care provider. Staff from participating sites underwent training and were asked to use a W&R approach with at least one older person. Eighteen older people aged 65+ were engaged in the 4‐month programme. Semi‐structured interviews with older people and staff were conducted on completion of the programme. The W&R approach showed variable benefits and experiences of older people related to goal setting and outcomes. Overall, older people were unfamiliar with goal setting or displayed negative attitudes. Negative emotional responses to health decline and ageing, such as apathy, frustration, embarrassment and sense of helplessness, were identified as barriers to goal pursual. In contrast, enabling factors, such as assistive equipment, staff and social connection, triggered positive emotional responses, which acted as protective factors and enhanced goal pursual. Staff knowledge and understanding of the W&R approach also influenced older people's experience and outcomes. These findings recommend a stronger focus on the social and emotional aspects of W&R and co‐developing goals in line with the older person's sense of wellbeing. This approach supports the multiple dimensions of W&R and aligns with principles of positive and healthy ageing. Additional training for staff should be provided, with ongoing mentoring and support from W&R champions. Ensuring that goals are meaningful and valuable to individual older people will enhance successful goal pursual and improve outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]