1. Primary fit tracheoesophageal puncture in primary versus salvage laryngectomy: Short-term and long-term complications and functional outcomes.
- Author
-
Kanyo EC, Wu SS, Reddy CA, Silver NL, Lamarre ED, Burkey BB, Prendes BL, Scharpf J, Lorenz RR, Kmiecik J, and Ku JA
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Retrospective Studies, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Trachea surgery, Larynx, Artificial, Treatment Outcome, Laryngectomy adverse effects, Laryngectomy methods, Salvage Therapy methods, Laryngeal Neoplasms surgery, Punctures, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Esophagus surgery
- Abstract
Background: Primary fit tracheoesophageal puncture (TEP) is widely preferred for individuals who have not undergone prior radiation. However, there is no consensus on the relative utility of primary-fit TEP in the setting of salvage laryngectomy., Methods: A retrospective, single-center review was conducted of individuals undergoing laryngectomy with primary fit TEP between 2012 and 2018. Multivariable analysis was conducted to compare short-term and long-term complications, as well as speech and swallowing outcomes, of those who underwent primary versus salvage laryngectomy., Results: In this study, 134 patients underwent total laryngectomy with primary fit TEP. Aside from a higher rate of peristomal dehiscence (13.1% vs. 1.4%) found in the salvage group, there was no difference in incidence of all other complications, including pharyngocutaneous fistula formation. The groups had comparable speech and swallow outcomes., Conclusion: Primary fit TEP is a safe and effective surgical choice for individuals undergoing salvage laryngectomy who desire a voice prosthesis., (© 2024 The Authors. Head & Neck published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF