Search

Novice surfers are at risk for a rare but potentially devastating form of atraumatic myelopathy. There are 16 published studies on this condition, including 66 cases. The most common suggested mechanism of injury is static hyperextension. However, active mechanisms, in contrast to static, have also been proposed and may be contributory. First time surfers, defined as those who have never been on a surfboard prior to the day of injury, are at particular risk. These individuals make up 89.5%-100% of the reported novice surfers found in the various reports. Multiple neurologic deficits occur and often include paraparesis, paraplegia, urinary retention, and hyperesthesia. While these deficits resolve in some cases, there are reports of multiple instances of permanent injury. Increased awareness of this condition is arguably the most effective preventative measure, as it may lead to avoidance of the predisposing postures. It may also lead to earlier diagnosis in the acute setting, which will become relevant as treatment modalities continue to be refined.

Surfing is a popular recreational sport that carries a substantial risk of injury. Although head injuries are frequently documented in the surfing population, an in depth assessment of the prevalence of surfing-related head injury has not been reported. A web-based survey was conducted in May of 2015. Participants were asked a series of questions regarding surfing-related injuries and demographic characteristics. A total of 50 responses were obtained, of which 35 (70%) reported sustaining a head injury. The most common injury was laceration of the head/face (n=27), followed by concussion (n=13). Other injuries, such as skull fracture and broken nose, were also reported. Only 2 of the 50 participants reported wearing a protective helmet. Neurosurgical intervention was required in 2 instances. Increased emphasis on preventative measures by the medical community may reduce the future incidence of such injuries. Medical professionals should be aware of the most common forms of injury sustained by the surfing population in order to better recognize and treat these conditions.

Visualization of the fundus is an important component of any ophthalmologic exam. Students are taught to visualize the fundus using a direct handheld ophthalmoscope. However, this device has many limitations, which may be a detriment to medical education and patient care. The invention of the non-mydriatic automatic fundus camera could significantly improve medical education. Our study examined the ability of a group of 5 medical students to visualize pathology and form a diagnosis with a traditional handheld ophthalmoscope and an automatic fundus camera. With the direct ophthalmoscope, none of the students were able to visualize the macula, a crucial aspect of the ophthalmologic exam. With the automatic fundus camera, all students were able to visualize the fundus. The latter modality also increased the proportion of students that was able to correctly diagnose the patients with diabetic retinopathy, 100% vs 40%. On average, students were also more confident in their ability to visualize basic retinal anatomy with the automatic fundus camera, 9.6/10 vs 6.4/10. Thus, incorporating the non-mydriatic automatic fundus camera into medical education, alongside the handheld ophthalmoscope, has the potential to improve both learning outcomes and patient care.