Search

New surgical techniques for the treatment of scaphoid non-union, developed in the last two decades, now enable a healing rate of 80-90%. However, no consensus exists for the surgical treatment of non-union. On the other hand, regenerative medicine techniques have enriched the therapeutic armamentarium for non-union, especially in the lower limbs, with the use of autologous concentrated bone marrow injection using autologous osteogenic precursors to create a favorable microenvironment for bone healing. This technique has the advantages of being inexpensive, easily accessible and applicable in scaphoid non-union as a biological adjuvant to surgery, to improve both healing times and rates. We report 6-month clinical results for the first patient receiving autologous concentrated bone marrow injection associated to scaphoid screw fixation in our center., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Introduction: The proximal regions of the brachial plexus (roots, trunks) are more susceptible to permanent damage due to stretch injuries than the distal regions (cords, terminal branches). A better description of brachial plexus mechanical behavior is necessary to better understand deformation mechanisms in stretch injury. The purpose of this study was to model the biomechanical behavior of each portion of the brachial plexus (roots, trunks, cords, peripheral nerves) in a cadaveric model and report differences in elastic modulus, maximum stress and maximum strain., Methods: Eight cadaveric plexi, divided into 47 segments according to regions of interest, underwent cyclical uniaxial tensile tests, using a BOSE® Electroforce® 3330 and INSTRON® 5969 material testing machines, to obtain the stress and strain histories of each specimen. Maximum stress, maximum strain and elastic modulus were extracted from the load-displacement and stress-strain curves. Statistical analyses used 1-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD (Honestly Significant Difference) and Mann-Whitney tests., Results: Mean elastic modulus was 8.65 MPa for roots, 8.82 MPa for trunks, 22.44 MPa for cords, and 26.43 MPa for peripheral nerves. Differences in elastic modulus and in maximum stress were statistically significant (p < 0.001) between proximal (roots, trunks) and distal (cords, peripheral nerves) specimens., Conclusions: Proximal structures demonstrated significantly smaller elastic modulus and maximum stress than distal structures. These data confirm the greater fragility of proximal regions of the brachial plexus., (Copyright © 2024 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Peripheral nerves consist of axons and connective tissue. The amount of connective tissue in peripheral nerves such as the brachial plexus varies proximally to distally. The proximal regions of the brachial plexus are more susceptible to stretch injuries than the distal regions. A description of the mechanical behavior of the peripheral nerve components is necessary to better understand the deformation mechanisms during stretch injuries. The purpose of this study was to model the biomechanical behavior of each component of the peripheral nerves (fascicles, connective tissue) in a cadaveric model and report differences in elastic modulus, maximum stress and maximum strain., Methods: Forty-six specimens of fascicles and epi-perineurium were subjected to cyclical uniaxial tensile tests to obtain the stress and strain histories of each specimen, using a BOSE® Electroforce® 3330 and INSTRON® 5969 materials testing machines. Maximum stress, maximum strain and elastic modulus were extracted from the load-displacement and stress-strain curves, and analyzed using Mann-Whitney tests., Results: Mean elastic modulus was 6.34 MPa for fascicles, and 32.1 MPa for connective tissue. The differences in elastic modulus and maximum stress between fascicles and connective tissue were statistically significant (p < 0.001)., Conclusions: Peripheral nerve connective tissue showed significantly higher elastic modulus and maximum stress than fascicles. These data confirm the greater fragility of axons compared to connective tissue, suggesting that the greater susceptibility to stretch injury in proximal regions of the brachial plexus might be related to the smaller amount of connective tissue., (Copyright © 2024 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Spasticity management in finger flexors (flexor digitorum profundus and superficialis and flexor pollicis longus) is a challenge. Recent studies demonstrated the short- and long-term efficacy of selective and hyperselective neurectomy for the spastic upper limb. However, hyperselective neurectomy of flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis branches was incomplete, without impairing their muscular body and function. This cadaveric study describes a novel medial approach in the forearm, to reach all the muscular branches: flexor digitorum superficialis and profundus and flexor pollicis longus., Material and Methods: Fourteen cadaveric fresh frozen upper limbs were used. The feasibility of the medial surgical approach was studied, as well as the number, length and point of emergence of the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerves to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis., Results: The medial approach to the forearm gave access to all the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerves to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus, in all cases. A Martin Gruber communicating branch was found in 7 cases out of 14., Conclusion: The medial approach to the forearm gave access to all the muscular branches from the median and ulnar nerve to the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum superficialis and flexor digitorum profundus, without extensive transmuscular dissection of the pronator teres or flexor digitorum superficialis muscles. This approach opens the way for selective neurectomy of the flexor pollicis longus, flexor digitorum profundus and flexor digitorum superficialis muscles., Level of Evidence: IV., (Copyright © 2024 SFCM. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)