Search

Background: Dupuytren disease is a common fibroproliferative disease that affects the palmar fascia of the hands. Currently, there is limited consensus regarding the optimal therapy for this condition, with treatment decisions based largely on surgeon preference. Therefore, the aim of this study was to determine which treatments are the most effective for Dupuytren disease., Method: A systematic review and network meta-analyses were conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses 2020 guidelines. Medline, EMBASE, and Web of Science were searched for randomized trials comparing treatments for Dupuytren disease in adults. Eligible treatments included open limited fasciectomy, collagenase injection, and percutaneous needle fasciotomy. Study selection, data extraction, and quality appraisal were performed in duplicate. The methodological quality was evaluated with the Cochrane risk-of-bias critical appraisal tool., Results: Eleven randomized clinical trials were included in this study. At short-term (1-12 weeks) and long-term (2-5 years) time points, fasciectomy improved contracture release more than collagenase and needle fasciotomy as inferred by a lower total passive extension deficit. However, there was no difference between the groups regarding the best possible outcome at any time point. Fasciectomy was also superior in terms of recurrence and patient satisfaction compared with collagenase and needle fasciotomy, but only at later time points. There was no difference in skin damage-related and nerve damage-related complications following fasciectomy compared with other modalities. Risk of bias was generally moderate., Conclusions: Fasciectomy provides superior long-term advantages in terms of patient outcomes when compared with collagenase and needle fasciotomy. Larger trials with better blinding of outcome assessors are needed in the future., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: G.M. was the authorizer of a health technology assessment of the collagenase product for South Australia; however, this does not represent a conflict of interest with regard to this publication. The authors have no other conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: The purpose of this study was to determine the perioperative complication rate of surgical fasciectomy following previous treatment with collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) treatment in patients with Dupuytren disease., Methods: A retrospective review of all patients at a large health system undergoing CCH treatment and subsequent limited surgical fasciectomy for recurrence on the same digit between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Fifty-two patients with 62 affected digits met inclusion criteria, and cases were reviewed for preoperative demographics, treatment characteristics, clinical outcomes, and perioperative complications., Results: Fifty-five digits in 48 patients were treated with CCH and underwent subsequent limited surgical fasciectomy. Of all digits in the present study, 3 (6.3%) had a documented surgical complication following open surgical fasciectomy. There were zero postoperative infections, vascular injuries, or tendon injuries. The rate of nerve injury was 2.1%. The rate of postoperative skin necrosis was 4.2%. These rates were comparable or lower than those of historical published data., Conclusions: The rate of perioperative complications in patients undergoing limited surgical fasciectomy after previous CCH treatment is low. The findings of this study will aid the counseling of Dupuytren patients in deciding whether to pursue treatment with CCH versus open surgical fasciectomy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: This article compares the rates and time-to-development of new-onset Dupuytren disease in patients with trigger finger treated by steroid injection, surgical release, or both., Methods: PearlDiver's Mariner 30 database was queried to identify patients with trigger finger between January 2010 and June 2019. One-to-one exact matching based on baseline patient demographics allowed us to create 4 identical groups defined by the type of trigger finger intervention received., Results: The matched population analyzed in this study consisted of 85 944 patients who were equally represented in the steroid injection cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%), surgical release cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%), steroids prior to surgery cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%), and no intervention (control) cohort (n = 21 486, 25.00%). A new Dupuytren diagnosis after trigger finger treatment occurred in 1 in 128 patients overall, 1 in 156 patients treated with steroid injection, and 1 in 126 patients treated with surgical release. Trigger fingers treated by steroid injection only had the lowest rates of Dupuytren disease overall (n = 137, 0.64%, P = .0424) and treatment with fasciectomy (n = 14, 0.07%, P < .0005). In all, 171 patients in the surgery cohort developed Dupuytren disease 1 year after undergoing surgical trigger finger release. Furthermore, this cohort had the highest rates of fasciectomy (n = 55, 0.26%, P < .0005) and the lowest rates of no intervention (n = 103, 0.48%, P = .0471). Trigger fingers managed by surgical release developed Dupuytren disease (mean, 56.11 days; SD, 80.93 days, log-rank P = .02) and underwent fasciectomy (mean, 49.74 days; SD, 62.27 days; log-rank P < .0005) more quickly than all other cohorts., Conclusions: Patients solely undergoing surgical release of their trigger finger had significantly higher odds and expedited rate of developing new-onset Dupuytren disease overall and undergoing subsequent treatment by fasciectomy compared with trigger fingers managed by other interventions., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Dupuytren disease creates thickened cords of the palmar fascia, leading to progressive flexion contractures that severely hinder hand function. Collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) injection is a common, minimally invasive alternative to surgical excision of these cords. The impact of CCH injection on the histological architecture of Dupuytren cords has not been studied extensively. Methods: A series of 10 CCH-injected cords were evaluated histologically. Cellularity, architecture, and connective tissue organization were compared against uninjected Dupuytren cords and normal palmar fascia. Results: No significant histopathological differences between CCH-injected and CCH-uninjected cords were identified. Conclusions: Dupuytren cords do not demonstrate histological changes with prior exposure to CCH.

Background: Clinical goniometry for the assessment of contracture in Dupuytren disease is time-consuming and costly, and there is no universal method for evaluating the severity of the disease. This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of patient-taken photography for the remote assessment of Dupuytren disease., Methods: Patients at our unit were provided with instructions on how to take standardized photographs of their diseased hand(s), which were subsequently analyzed by computer software to obtain formal measurements of the severity of disease. Compliance with photography instructions and ability to provide a photo of sufficient quality for analysis were measured., Results: In all, 222 patients supplied photos for analysis; 158 patients (71.2%) were able to take the photographs as instructed. The remaining 28.8% took 1 or more of the images incorrectly or of insufficient quality. There were no statistically significant differences between those able to take the photos as directly versus those who took the photos incorrectly when compared by sex, age, or severity of disease., Conclusions: Patient-taken photography used to estimate disease severity in Dupuytren disease is an achievable, efficient, and reliable method of remotely assessing and monitoring patients and may be increasingly useful given the current health care climate and preference for remote consultations.

Background: The objective of this study was to compare the rates of recurrence, additional treatment, patient satisfaction, and willingness to undergo Clostridium histolyticum (CCH) treatment again for Dupuytren disease in patients with and without skin tearing at minimum 5-year follow-up. Methods: We identified 199 digits in 142 patients who underwent CCH treatments for Dupuytren disease from April 2010 to December 2013 with minimum 5-year follow-up. Patients were contacted by telephone to collect our response variables: perceived recurrence of contracture, additional treatment, satisfaction, and willingness to undergo CCH treatment again. Medical records were reviewed for skin tearing at manipulation and patient-related and disease-specific variables. Results: At the time of manipulation, 16 out of 142 patients (11%) and 22 out of 199 digits (11%) had skin tearing. Older age was associated with skin tearing. At an average 7.2-year follow-up, the mean satisfaction was 7.1 ± 2.6 on a 1 to 10 Likert scale for patients with skin tearing and 6.5 ± 3.4 for patients without skin tearing. Eighty-one percent of patients with skin tearing expressed willingness to undergo CCH treatment again, compared with 68% of patients without skin tearing. Perceived recurrence of contracture occurred in 82% of digits with skin tearing and 80% of digits without skin tearing. Additional treatment was performed in 45% of digits with skin tearing and 54% of digits without skin tearing. No difference was statistically significant. Conclusions: Although skin tearing at CCH manipulation complicates the short-term course following CCH treatment, it does not affect long-term perceived contracture recurrence or patient satisfaction.

Background: Emerging literature introduces radiation therapy for benign hand conditions. However, hand surgeons are wary recommending radiation therapy for nonmalignant conditions. In our practice, we have used radiation therapy for patients who present with infiltrative or recurrent giant cell tumor of the tendon sheath (GCTTS) since 1998. The purpose of this study is to examine the secondary effects of radiation to the hand through the critical lens of a hand surgeon. Methods: A case series of patients who received radiation therapy for GCTTS were reviewed. The Radiation Oncology/Toxicity Grading Late Radiation Morbidity Scoring Schema was used, and patients were questioned about symptoms and examined for physical findings involving their irradiated digits. Results: A total of 8 patients with GCTTS presented for follow-up. The average patient age was 59.1 years, and the average time since radiation therapy was 5.4 years. Patients had an average of 2.3 surgeries on the affected digit prior to receiving radiation therapy. The average Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score was 8.1. The most common sign of radiation was nail changes. All patients complained of sensibility changes, although only 2 of the 8 patients had abnormal moving 2-point discrimination tests. There were no confirmed recurrences of GCTTS and no skin cancers. Conclusions: Patients who received radiation therapy to the hand report high levels of satisfaction with the therapy. Radiation therapy is tolerated well by these patients and has a low level of morbidity in our population.

Background: Indication for intervention in Dupuytren disease is influenced by many factors, including location and extent of disease, surgeon preference, and comfort level with different treatment techniques. The aim of this study was to determine current Dupuytren disease management trends. Methods: A questionnaire was sent through the American Society for Surgery of the Hand to all members. In addition to demographic data, questions focused on indications for different procedural interventions based on location of disease, age, and activity level of the patient. Results: Approximately 24% of respondents completed the survey. Respondents were mostly orthopedic surgeons in private practice who do not work with residents or fellows. Respondents preferred collagenase over needle aponeurotomy and limited fasciectomy for primary Dupuytren disease involving only the metacarpophalangeal (MCP) joint. Limited fasciectomy was the preferred treatment for primary Dupuytren disease involving the MCP and proximal interphalangeal joints. For a patient amenable to any treatment option, the majority would use collagenase, although 87.1% felt that fasciectomy offered the longest disease-free interval. Furthermore, given the option of a young, working patient, 42.7% would use collagenase, while plastic and general surgeons were more likely to treat this patient with limited fasciectomy. More plastic surgeons (vs orthopedic) believe that limited fasciectomy yields the longest disease-free interval. For a patient amenable to any surgical option, orthopedic surgeons prefer collagenase, whereas plastic hand surgeons prefer a limited fasciectomy. Conclusion: There are several procedural options for the treatment of Dupuytren disease. This study details current practice patterns among hand surgeons and reveals the increasingly prevalent use of collagenase.

Background: Dupuytren disease is a common fibroproliferative disorder. Multiple procedural treatment options are available, with Collagenase Clostridium Histolyticum (CCH) injection being introduced in 2010. The purpose of this study was to investigate trends in the treatment of Dupuytren disease in the United States between 2007 and 2014. Methods: The PearlDiver Humana database was queried using International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for patients with Dupuytren disease that received percutaneous needle aponeurotomy (PNA), fasciotomy, fasciectomy, and CCH injection. Patients were filtered by age, number of comorbidities, and gender. Change in composition of treatments over time was analyzed for each demographic group between 2007 and 2014. Results: Patients presenting to clinic for Dupuytren disease increased from 1118 to 3280, with unchanging treatment percentage of 41. Percent fasciotomies and fasciectomies decreased from 5% to 3% and 33% to 21%, while CCH injection increased to 11% by 2012 to 2014. Percent fasciotomies decreased ( P < .05) in younger healthier (age <65, 0-1 comorbidities) and older less healthy (age 65-74, 4+ comorbidities) populations. Percent fasciectomies decreased significantly in nearly all age and comorbidity groups, but by greater amounts in patients with 2+ comorbidities with increasing age. Percent CCH injections increased in all groups, at rates similar to the losses seen in open procedures. Conclusions: CCH injections have risen to substantial levels, with corresponding decreases in the percentage of patients receiving fasciotomies and fasciectomies. Patient age, comorbidities, and gender appear to have influence on the treatment chosen, likely due to their effects on surgical risk and the importance of timely return to activity., Competing Interests: The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.