Search

Practice patterns and utilization of physical therapists (PTs) affiliated with Hemophilia Treatment Centers (HTCs) in the United States (US) are not well known.Describe utilization, role responsibilities and practice patterns of US HTC PTs. Identify practice patterns specifically focusing on assessment and treatment of pain. Recognize gaps in utilization and role responsibilities of PTs as part of the multidisciplinary team and suggest guidelines for PT involvement within the HTC.Respondents were a subset of a convenience sample of healthcare providers who responded to a non-validated survey developed by a multi-disciplinary panel of haemophilia experts.A 33.0% response-rate (n = 59) representing all regions of US HTCs was achieved. Those working ≥10 hours per week were more likely to provide nutrition education (P = .026) and surgical options education (P .001). Those who billed insurance for their services during comprehensive visits were more likely to provide education regarding surgical options (P = .046). The majority of PTs (95.0%) evaluated pain regardless of time spent in clinic and felt comfortable treating pain. Fifty-eight percent used a formal pain measurement tool and more likely to use a formal pain measurement tool if billing insurance (P = .004). Top five non-pharmacologic treatments recommended for pain management included splints/braces (84.8%), aquatic therapy (74.6%), orthotics (71.2%), surgical options (47.5%) and yoga (32.2%).This study demonstrated PT utilization across HTC centres varies widely. Gaps in care may be addressed through salary support, funded education, greater regional/national collaboration of PTs specializing in bleeding disorders and advocacy for insurance coverage for appropriate services.

Introduction The Haemophilia Activities List (HAL) was developed to measure activities and participation in persons with haemophilia (PWH). Shortening the questionnaire may facilitate use of the HAL. Aim The aim of this study was to determine which items of the HAL are redundant, to construct a shorter version of the HAL, and to determine the construct validity of the HALshort . Methods A secondary analysis was performed on pooled data of two published studies using the HAL (seven domains, 42 items, optimum score: 100) in adults with haemophilia A/B. Data were divided into a derivation (62%) and a validation set (38%). Redundant items were identified by evaluation of: floor and ceiling effects, proportions of missing and 'not applicable' responses, inter-item correlations, component loadings in an exploratory factor analysis, internal consistency, and item-total correlations. Correlations with the SF-36 and EQ-5D-5L were used to determine construct validity of the HALshort . Results Data on 680 PWH were evaluated. In the derivation dataset (n = 420), median age was 30 years (range 18-80), 43% had severe haemophilia and 61% received prophylaxis. Median (IQR) HAL sum score was 65.0 (55.7-88.8). The stepwise procedure resulted in a HALshort of 18 items with a median sum score of 63.3 (54.4-86.7). Construct validity was similar for the HAL and HALshort in the validation dataset (n = 260). Conclusion This clinimetric study resulted in a >50% shortening of the HAL. The 18-item HALshort reduces patient burden and is expected to capture the information on activities and participation. The HALshort needs further validation.

Options for management of haemophilia are increasing rapidly with completely novel therapeutic approaches that cannot be compared using traditional factor assays. In addition, as prophylaxis regimens have improved, bleeding rates have decreased, and consequently, it is difficult to show an impact of novel therapies on rates of spontaneous bleeding. There is currently an urgent need for a panel of outcome measures to compare therapies that are dissimilar in many essential ways. Conventional objective outcome measures including joint physical examination and joint imaging continue to hold a central importance. Factor assays are essential for evaluation of products derived from native factor genes, but are not applicable to some extended half-life factors or non-factor bypassing agents. Global assays including thrombin generation and chromogenic assays of factor X activation are under investigation for their usefulness in haemophilia assessment. Bleeding rate is a conventional subjective patient-reported outcome that, while decreasing in frequency, is indispensable as an outcome given that the primary manifestation of haemophilia is bleeding. Other patient-reported outcomes such as pain intensity and interference, health-related quality of life and activities and participation are increasingly important to distinguish superior outcomes in comparative trials. This review of outcome measures for haemophilia presents examples of existing outcome measures with an emphasis on their strengths and limitations.

INTRODUCTION In patients with haemophilia, general psychological distress as measured by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) distress thermometer has been associated with pain, disability and increased healthcare utilization. AIMS To develop and validate a measure of haemophilia-related distress. METHODS After qualitative interviews, the Hemophilia-Related Distress Questionnaire (HRDq) was developed. To validate the HRDq, adults (≥18 years) with haemophilia were enrolled, reported demographic and clinical information, and completed the HRDq and other questionnaires that measured similar constructs. Analysis included factor analysis and assessment of internal consistency using Cronbach's α, convergent validity using Pearson's correlation coefficient, and discriminant validity by comparing subgroups of patients. Test-retest reliability was assessed using an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). RESULTS Among 130 enrolled participants, 126 (median age=32.7 years) completed the 24 item HRDq in a median time of 5.4 minutes with overall HRDq scores ranging from 2 to 83 (median score=31.5; higher scores indicating higher distress). Assessment of convergent validity demonstrated a strong correlation (ρ>.60) of the HRDq total score with the NCCN Distress Thermometer, Haem-A-QoL total Score, and PROMIS-29 Profile social role domain and a mild to moderate correlation with all other questionnaire domains (.3-.59, p

Introduction Standardized and disease-specific patient-reported outcome (PRO) instruments assessing pain, functional impairment and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in people with haemophilia (PWH) have been used in studies, but infrequently in comprehensive care settings for individual assessment or treatment planning. Aim To assess the impact of pain and functional impairment on HRQoL in PWH. Methods P-FiQ enrolled 381 adult PWH with a history of joint pain/bleeding and included 5 PROs and a clinical joint evaluation (Hemophilia Joint Health Score v2.1 [HJHS]). Results Median age was 34 years; 49.9% reported a history of joint procedure or surgery. On EQ-5D-5L, most reported problems with mobility (61.4%), usual activities (53.2%) and pain/discomfort (76.1%). On Brief Pain Inventory v2 Short Form, median worst pain (range 0-10) was 6, least pain 1, average pain 3 and current pain 2. Ankles were most frequently reported as the most painful joints (37.4%), followed by knees (23.7%) and elbows (18.9%). On International Physical Activity Questionnaire, 51% reported no activity in the prior week. On SF-36v2 health survey, median subscores were worse for 4 physical health domains vs 4 mental health domains. Among Hemophilia Activities List domains (range 0 [worst]-100 [best]), functions of the legs (median, 66.7) and lying/sitting/kneeling/standing (median, 67.5) were most impacted and self-care least impacted (median, 100.0). On HJHS, ankle scores (median, 6.0; range, 0-40) were worse than elbow/knee scores (median, 4.0/4.0). Results were consistent across PROs/HJHS. Conclusion Data demonstrate challenges of predominantly ankle/knee pain and lower extremity functional impairment in US adult PWH, affecting HRQoL across PROs/HJHS.