Search

Long-term, continuous prophylaxis for haemophilia began at a modest scale during the 1950s and 1960s in Sweden and The Netherlands. In the face of high cost and impediments to the performance of longitudinal, well-designed studies, it was decades before prophylaxis was considered to be the best practice in countries that could afford the cost. In 2007 and 2011, the only prospective randomized studies ever performed confirmed what large cohort studies in Europe had long since shown. Today, focus is on when to start prophylaxis, dosing and when/if to stop. Retrospective comparisons of the Swedish and Dutch cohorts, where different strategies have been used, indicate that a costly, high-dose regimen improves outcome, but not dramatically. A prospective comparison is now underway. Treatment, clinical outcome, clotting factor consumption and socioeconomic parameters will be compared between the two strategies. Results are expected to provide greater insight into the long-term consequences of the different prophylactic treatment strategies. The economic justification for prophylaxis has been addressed in several studies with varying results. While the majority (implicitly) suggest that prophylaxis is not cost effective at conventional willingness to pay for additional units in health thresholds, their results vary markedly. Closer inspection suggests that the primary reasons results differ include different definitions of prophylaxis, clotting factor price, discount rates, choice of outcome measures and time horizon.

The practice of prophylactic treatment of boys with severe haemophilia has been evaluated in our centre. Prophylaxis was started at the median age of 3.7 years (range 0.4-12.7 years) in 38/41 children (93%) under 17 years of age. Median follow-up was 4.1 years (range 0.4-12.7 years). The criteria of primary prophylaxis according to the definition by the European Paediatric Network of Haemophilia Management was fulfilled by 9/38 (24%). Although a majority [76%, 29/38] of the children started prophylaxis after a median number of joint bleeds of 3.5, 70% of the children in this group had clinical joint scores of 0. Intravenous catheter insertion was required at a median age of 15.5 months (range 5-36 months) in 21% of the children, resulting in a catheter infection rate of 1.74 per 1000 catheter days. None developed an inhibitor on prophylaxis and three patients who had low-titre inhibitors (< 5 Bethesda units) prior to prophylaxis had undetectable inhibitors after prophylaxis. The home-treatment training programme required considerable time and cost. As a result, 87% of the children used peripheral venous access and hospital visits declined as prophylaxis became established. Parents' incentives for prophylaxis were that the children undertook many physical activities and sports previously not recommended, there was less parental anxiety and an overall improvement in the quality of life for the whole family.

In this study, we assessed whether severity of haemophilia was associated with levels of productivity. Productivity levels were assessed by sending a 'time-use' questionnaire to 228 individuals with mild, moderate and severe haemophilia. The results showed that, after adjusting for differences in age and HIV serostatus, there were no differences between individuals with severe and mild/moderate haemophilia in terms of completed levels of education, employment status, absenteeism from work over the previous 2 weeks, the number of hours each week spent performing unpaid tasks and how efficiently individuals performed these tasks. The data did suggest, however, that a significantly larger proportion of individuals with severe haemophilia (32%) required help from family or friends to perform routine household tasks each week than individuals with mild/moderate haemophilia (13%). In conclusion, it is possible that individuals with severe haemophilia have similar levels of productivity compared to individuals with mild/moderate haemophilia or that treatment with secondary prophylaxis has helped to reduce differences between the two patient groups.

The objectives of this study were to analyse current levels of health-related quality-of-life (HR-QoL) in individuals with severe haemophilia and to assess the scope for these levels to improve. To do this, 249 individuals with severe, moderate and mild haemophilia were asked to complete Medical Outcomes Study (MOS) Short-Form 36 (SF-36) and EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaires. Access was also gained to two appropriate normative data sets. The results from these questionnaires showed that HIV status, history of orthopaedic surgery and bleeding frequency in the previous calendar year were not strong predictors of HR-QoL for individuals with severe haemophilia. However, for the majority of scales, age was found to be a strong predictor of HR-QoL for this patient group. The results from the analysis also showed that compared to individuals with moderate/mild haemophilia and the UK male normative population, individuals with severe haemophilia generally recorded poorer levels of HR-QoL. These results suggest, therefore, that individuals with severe haemophilia have reduced levels of HR-QoL compared to individuals with moderate/mild haemophilia and the general population, irrespective of differences in age. The results also suggest that the scope for primary prophylaxis to increase HR-QoL in individuals with severe haemophilia is significant.

In 1997 the UK Haemophilia Centre Directors Organization published the guidelines for diagnosis and management of von Willebrand disease (vWD). The guidelines stated that desmopressin (DDAVP) should be used in type 1 and type 2N vWD, that it might be useful in other types 2 vWD and that it is ineffective in type 3 vWD. If patients are unresponsive to DDAVP or if it is contraindicated, the treatment of choice is clotting factor concentrates (CFC). In the light of these guidelines, we audited our practice for 1997. Furthermore, we undertook a retrospective review of the changing patterns of treatment of vWD between 1980 and 1997. During 1997, 10 patients with vWD received DDAVP and another 30 patients were treated with CFC (a total of 1.2 million IU): Haemate P (Centeon, Germany) and/or 8Y (BPL, Elstree, UK). Few patients had clear contraindications to DDAVP, but several patients with type 1 and 2 vWD received CFC on the basis of age or reduced levels of von Willebrand factor - where DDAVP was considered suboptimal for adequate haemostasis. However, this assumption was made without a preliminary test dose to assess the response to DDAVP. The analysis of treatment of vWD for the past 17 years showed that cryoprecipitate was discontinued from use in the early 1990s and that both DDAVP and CFC usage has been on the increase. In conclusion, the audit illustrated a general good adherence to guidelines but it highlighted the need for a DDAVP test before using CFC.

The annual amount of clotting factor used by patients at the Royal Free Haemophilia Centre increased significantly from 4 million iu in 1980 to over 15 million iu by 1994 (P < 0.0001). In order to assess the reasons for this increase, data on concentrate usage over this period were retrospectively collected for patients who had haemophilia or von Willebrand's disease. Only patients who were registered exclusively at the Centre were included in the study. In total, 498 patients met the inclusion criterion. The median age of the cohort on 1 January 1980 was 21 (range < 1-69) years. During the period there were 88 births and 45 deaths. The majority of patients had haemophilia A (55%). The median follow-up period per patient was 2.1 (range 0-14.8) years. Despite adjusting for increases in the number of patients and changes in body weight, statistically significant increases in clotting factor usage were detected for some subgroups of patients, in particularly for those with severe haemophilia A and B and from the late 1980s onwards, for patients with von Willebrand's disease. Two reasons for this increase in clotting factor usage were identified as being the introduction of improved products and prophylaxis. However, the increased cost of clotting factor provision that has resulted from these changes in treatment policy should not be analysed in isolation but should be balanced off against cost decreases in other areas and against increases in the effectiveness of treatment.