Search

Background Acquired haemophilia (AH) is a rare bleeding disorder with significant morbidity and mortality. Most patients initially present to physicians without experience of the disease, delaying diagnosis and potentially worsening outcomes. Existing guidance in AH is limited to clinical opinion of few experts and does not address monitoring bleeds in specific anatomical locations. Aim Derive consensus from a large sample of experts around the world in monitoring bleeding patients with AH. Methods Using the Delphi methodology, a structured survey, designed to derive consensus on how to monitor bleeding patients with AH, was developed by a steering committee for completion by a group of haematologists with an interest in AH. Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement with a given survey statement. After three rounds of survey refinement, a final list of consensus statements was compiled. Results Thirty-six global specialists in AH participated. The participants spanned 20 countries and had treated a median of 12.0 (range, 1-50) patients with AH within the preceding 5 years. Consensus was achieved in all items after three survey rounds. In addition to statements on general management of bleeding patients, consensus statements in the following areas were presented: urinary tract, gastrointestinal tract, muscles, skin, joints, nose, pharynx, mouth, intracranial and postpartum. Conclusions Here, we present consensus statements derived from a broad sample of global specialists to address monitoring of location-specific bleeds and evaluating efficacy of bleeding treatment in patients with AH. These statements could be applied in practice by treating physicians and validated by individual population surveys.

Background While there is substantial literature addressing the principles of general management of haemophilia, literature on perioperative management of haemostasis is scarce. Objective The aim of this study was to better understand perioperative management among congenital haemophilia B patients (without inhibitors) and to gain insights into real-world surgical practices. Method A systematic literature review, with an emphasis on haemophilia B, was conducted using EMBASE®, Medline® and the Cochrane Library. Studies from 1974 to June 2015 were accessed, and 132 studies were eligible for the full-study review. An international expert panel with five haematologists and one surgeon reviewed the resulting literature and provided further insights. Results The literature review revealed that documented experience in the perioperative management of bleeding risk in haemophilia B patients is relatively scarce. Therefore, the review was amended to provide a comprehensive overview of the perioperative management for haemophilia A and B patients; the expert panel applied a particular focus to haemophilia B. Several gaps were identified in the literature including the lack of consensus on defining surgery in terms of bleeding risk, optimal factor levels during surgery and lack of robust evidence on surgical outcomes. The ensuing discussions with the expert panel provided validation of some of the results from the systematic literature review and proposed future directions for perioperative management. Suggestions included collaboration with haemophilia treatment centres (HTCs) to collect real-world data on perioperative management, establishing the need for optimal factor level monitoring practice, and the appropriate adoption of extended half-life products in clinical settings.

This report summarizes recommendations relating to haemophilia therapy arising from discussions among experts from 36 European countries during the Kreuth III meeting in April 2013. To optimize the organization of haemophilia care nationally, it is recommended that a formal body be established in each country to include the relevant clinicians, national haemophilia patient organization, health ministry, paying authority and (if appropriate) regulatory authorities. The minimum factor VIII consumption level in a country should be 3 I.U. per capita. Decisions on whether to adopt a new product should not be based solely on cost. Prophylaxis for children with severe haemophilia is already recognized as the optimum therapy. Ongoing prophylaxis for individual adults should also be provided when required based on clinical decision making by the clinician in consultation with the patient. Children with inhibitors who have failed, or who are not suitable for, immune tolerance therapy should be offered prophylaxis with bypassing agents. Single factor concentrates should be used as therapy wherever possible in patients with rare bleeding disorders. Orphan drug designation for a factor concentrate should not be used to hinder the development, licencing and marketing of other products for the same condition which have demonstrably different protein modification or enhancement.

Haemostasis management in people with haemophilia can present a range of challenges to physicians. Specific challenges that may be encountered relate to regimens for immune tolerance induction, use of central venous access devices, optimizing care of paediatric patients with inhibitors and improving outcomes in acquired haemophilia. There are also challenges related to performing surgery, and the establishment of specialist centres is valuable with regard to this. These challenges are considered in the light of available data, and with perspectives gained from the experience of experts treating patients around the world. Sharing this knowledge may help to improve patient management.

Inhibitors are a serious complication, considerably increasing the morbidity, mortality and cost of treatment in this patient group. The challenge of treating people with haemophilia (PWH) with inhibitors can be met by a well-coordinated multidisciplinary team specialized in haemophilia. Each treatment centre must run a screening programme to detect inhibitors within their population and develop protocols to treat these patients. The treatment centre in Buenos Aires developed a screening programme that tests all our patients twice a year, ensuring early detection of inhibitors and early treatment of complications. In 2006, we analysed the quality of life (QOL) of non-inhibitor patients and compared it with inhibitor patients detected by this programme and found no differences in QOL measured by the SF36 questionnaire and no differences in school absenteeism. When diagnosis of the inhibitor does not come from a screening programme, its presence is suspected upon a lack of response to conventional replacement therapy for musculoskeletal bleeding, losing the 'golden moment' of treatment. This complication is much more serious when facing a traumatic bleed. In this situation, the lack of early diagnosis can lead to permanent damage or even death. Due to the cost of bypassing factors and the lack of experience of the medical team in the treatment of patients with inhibitors, many treatments that would improve the QOL of patients are instituted in an insufficient manner. Therefore, patients with haemophilia and inhibitors are often untreated or undertreated in their community. Orthopaedic surgeons and physiotherapists play a key role in the treatment of these patients and should be included in therapeutic decision making and most specifically in the postoperative treatment of patients with haemophilia and inhibitors. It is important that these patients have quick access to a trained therapeutic team in order to obtain an early diagnosis and treatment plan to prevent the evolution of the pathological process. Early treatment is cost-effective in maintaining and improving the QOL of patients. Experience in patients with haemophilia and inhibitors is not very extensive. Today, this situation is changing, with several treatment centres beginning to perform surgeries in these most complex patients, giving them a chance to improve their QOL. This article presents the experience of experts from various fields involved in treating patients with inhibitors from a developed and developing world perspective.