Search

Background and Objectives: In the absence of a cure for multiple myeloma (MM) with standard-dose therapy, any strategy that can be expected to increase tumor reduction and to extend survival duration is likely to be of clinical relevance. The primary end-point of the present study was to investigate whether the alternating combination of vincristine-doxorubicin-dexamethasone (VAD) and melphalan-prednisone (MP) or vincristine-mitoxantrone-dexamethasone (VND) and MP could improve the clinical outcome of MM patients thus treated in comparison with those receiving MP alone., Design and Methods: Between November 1990 and April 1994, 527 previously untreated, stage I-III, MM patients from 29 Italian institutions were randomized to receive one of three remission induction chemotherapy regimens consisting of 8-monthly courses of either MP alone or alternating VAD/MP or VND/MP., Results: On an intent-to-treat basis, the objective response rates were 53% with MP (objective + minor: 67%), 47% with VAD/MP (objective + minor: 61%) and 49% with VND/MP (objective + minor: 61%). Median survival duration was 36.5 months with MP, 29 months with VAD/MP and 32.5 months with VND/MP. The difference among these groups was not statistically significant, even after stratifying patients into high-risk and low-risk subgroups, as assessed by a multifactor proportional hazard analysis. In both younger and elderly patients, severe granulocytopenia and related infections were significantly more frequent with VND/MP compared to the remaining arms of treatment (p < 0.001 and p = 0.009, respectively). Similarly, the frequency of WHO grade III-IV cardiovascular events was significantly higher for patients receiving anthracycline-containing regimens (VND/MP and VAD/MP) than for those treated with MP alone (p = 0.04)., Interpretation and Conclusions: Alternating VAD/MP and VND/MP failed to improve the clinical outcome for MM patients, at the cost of increased toxicity and morbidity. Resistance to standard-dose chemotherapy remains a significant obstacle to the treatment of MM.

Background and Objective: Autologous blood stem cell transplantation (ABSCT) using chemotherapy-induced mobilization of peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) is being increasingly used in the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). We report the clinical and molecular follow-up of 10 MM patients who underwent autologous stem cell transplantation with peripheral blood selected CD34+ cells, as support therapy following a myeloablative conditioning regimen., Design and Methods: The CDR-III coding region of the IgH gene was studied by a) consensus PCR applied to 8 MM patients, or b) by direct sequencing of PCR product generated by family-specific primers in the remaining two patients (who became immunofixation analysis (IF) negative). In this case, two patient-specific primers were generated, thus obtaining a high PCR assay sensitivity and specificity (ASO PCR)., Results: Seven patients are alive: 4 of them have serum M protein assessable by IF, while 1 was not a secretor and 2 converted from serum IF positivity to negativity 6 and 12 months after ABSCT. Three patients died: 1 from disease progression and 2 from infective complications during clinical remission. The molecular analysis during the follow-up showed that the bone marrow samples from the two patients who obtained IF negativity were persistently PCR positive for the presence of rearranged CDR-III region. Moreover, despite the remarkable reduction of myeloma burden, a minimal level of residual myeloma cells was still detectable by molecular analysis., Interpretation and Conclusions: These results confirm that although positive selection of CD34+ cells markedly reduces the contamination of myeloma cells from apheresis products by up to 3 log, and provides a cell suspension capable of restoring normal hematopoiesis after ablative conditioning regimen, it does not abrogate myeloma cell contamination in most of the apheresis products.