1. Do long-term migrants earn higher wages than short-term migrants in the informal sector? Evidence from Jammu & Kashmir, India.
- Author
-
Shah, Farah Farooq, Joshi, D. P. Priyadarshi, and Gopinathan, R.
- Subjects
- *
INFORMAL sector , *WAGES , *CONTRAST effect , *IMMIGRANTS , *MARITAL status - Abstract
Many theories hypothesize that long-term migration is more welfare-enhancing than short-term migration as the benefits from skill acquisition, experience, and labour networks outplay the permanent disutility/cost of migration. This article aims to evaluate the influence of long-term migration on wages and contrast it with the effect of short-term migration on wages. We applied the Endogenous switching regression (ESR) model to measure the treatment effect of long-term migration on wages. The results suggest that religion, marital status, employment sector, experience, and region are significant determinants of long-term migration. We also conclude that short-term migrants are better than long-term migrants in Jammu & Kashmir because the treatment effect negatively affects migrants' daily wages. The paper also directs potential policy implications. • The paper compares the impact of long-term and short-term migration on wages. • ESR model evaluates the wage difference between long-term and short-term migrants. • Households' decisions on migration length affect wages and welfare. • Short-term migrants earn higher wages than long-term migrants in Jammu & Kashmir. • Short-term migration to politically and environmentally volatile places is better. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF