Search

Objective To investigate safety and effectiveness of NOMAC-E2 and levonorgestrel-containing COCs (COCLNG) in users over 40.Methods In this large, observational study, new users1 of NOMAC-E2 and COCLNG were recruited in Europe, Australia, and Latin America and followed-up via questionnaires. Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) was expressed as incidence rate (IR; events/104 women-years [WY]). Unintended pregnancy was expressed by the Pearl Index (PI; contraceptive failures/100 WY). Mood and weight changes were defined as mean changes in mood score and percentage of body weight.Results Overall, 7,762 NOMAC-E2 and 6,059 COCLNG users over 40 were followed-up. NOMAC-E2 showed no increased VTE risk compared to COCLNG; confirmed events: 5 NOMAC-E2 (IR 5.9; 95% CI, 1.9–13.7) vs 4 COCLNG (IR 5.9; 95% CI, 1.6–15.1). Unintended pregnancy did not differ substantially between cohorts; confirmed events: 4 NOMAC-E2 (PI 0.05; 95% CI, 0.01–0.13) vs 5 COCLNG (PI 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03–0.18). No differential effect on mood and weight was observed between cohorts.Conclusions NOMAC-E2 can be considered a valid alternative to COCLNG in perimenopausal women.

Objective: To investigate unintended pregnancy and changes in mood, acne, and weight in NOMAC-E2 vs levonorgestrel-containing COC (COCLNG) users under 25 years.Methods: In this large, observational study, new users (first-ever users of an eligible COC or restarting with the same or a new eligible COC after a break of at least 2 months) of NOMAC-E2 and COCLNG were recruited in 12 countries in Europe, Australia, and Latin America and followed up via questionnaires for up to 2 years. Unintended pregnancy was expressed by the Pearl Index (PI; contraceptive failures/100 women-years). Crude (HRcrude) and adjusted hazard ratios (HRadj) were calculated. Mood and acne changes were defined as change of score from baseline. Weight change was defined as percent change of body weight.Results: Overall, 12,829 NOMAC-E2 users and 17,095 COCLNG users under 25 were followed-up. The risk of unintended pregnancy was statistically significantly lower in the NOMAC-E2 cohort; confirmed events: 30 NOMAC-E2 (PI 0.24; 95% CI, 0.16–0.35) vs 94 COCLNG (PI 0.51; 95% CI, 0.41–0.62). The HRcrude for unintended pregnancy comparing NOMAC-E2 to COCLNG was 0.47 (95% CI, 0.31–0.71) and the HRadj was 0.52 (95% CI, 0.34–0.78). No differential effect on acne, mood, and weight was observed between cohorts.Conclusions: NOMAC-E2 shows a significantly better contraceptive effectiveness in young women and has no differential effect on acne, mood, and weight compared to COCLNG.