1. Intraperitoneal chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and optimal interval tumor reductive surgery for advanced ovarian cancer
- Author
-
Monica Hagan Vetter, Paula S. Lee, J.M. Fowler, Kristin Bixel, Laura J. Havrilesky, Angeles Alvarez Secord, David E. Cohn, Ritu Salani, Andrew Berchuck, David M. O'Malley, Brittany A. Davidson, Fidel A. Valea, Larry J. Copeland, and F.J. Backes
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Adult ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Bevacizumab ,Organoplatinum Compounds ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Carcinoma, Ovarian Epithelial ,03 medical and health sciences ,Young Adult ,0302 clinical medicine ,Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols ,medicine ,Humans ,Infusions, Parenteral ,Progression-free survival ,Stage (cooking) ,Infusions, Intravenous ,Aged ,Retrospective Studies ,Aged, 80 and over ,Ovarian Neoplasms ,Univariate analysis ,Chemotherapy ,business.industry ,Obstetrics and Gynecology ,Histology ,Cytoreduction Surgical Procedures ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Neoadjuvant Therapy ,Progression-Free Survival ,Surgery ,030104 developmental biology ,Oncology ,Chemotherapy, Adjuvant ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,Toxicity ,Female ,Taxoids ,Ovarian cancer ,business ,medicine.drug - Abstract
Objectives Intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy following neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and interval tumor reductive surgery (TRS) for advanced ovarian cancer is feasible, however, the impact on disease outcomes remains unclear. We compare outcomes of patients treated with IP chemotherapy versus intravenous (IV) chemotherapy following NACT and interval TRS. Methods In this retrospective review, patients with advanced ovarian cancer were included if they received NACT followed by optimal interval TRS between 1/2004 and 4/2017. Patients were excluded if they had an ECOG PS >1, received >6 cycles of NACT or postoperative chemotherapy, and/or received bevacizumab during primary therapy. Primary outcomes were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Results There were 134 patients included in this study, 37 (28%) received IP and 97 (72%) received IV chemotherapy postoperatively. Patients in the IV group were older (median 66.3 vs 59.7 years, p = 0.0039) though there were no differences in BMI, race, BRCA status, stage, or histology. Median PFS was 3 months longer in the IP group (14.5 versus 11.5 months, p = 0.028) however there was no significant difference in OS. On univariate analysis, increasing number of NACT cycles (HR 1.914, 95% CI 1.024–3.497) and residual disease at completion of TRS (HR 1.541, 95% CI 1.042–2.248) were associated with decreased PFS; IP chemotherapy was associated with increased PFS (HR 0.633, 95% CI 0.414–0.944). These associations remained on multivariate analysis. Toxicity was comparable between the groups. Conclusions IP after NACT and optimal interval TRS was associated with in improved PFS compared to IV chemotherapy without significant differences in toxicity.
- Published
- 2019