Search

Objectives: Part 1 of the RUBY trial (NCT03981796) demonstrated improved survival in patients with primary advanced or recurrent endometrial cancer (EC) treated with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel versus placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel. Here, we examine additional efficacy and safety data from patients with mismatch repair deficient/microsatellite instability-high (dMMR/MSI-H) EC in the RUBY trial., Methods: Patients were randomized 1:1 to dostarlimab 500 mg or placebo plus carboplatin-paclitaxel every 3 weeks for 6 cycles followed by dostarlimab or placebo every 6 weeks for up to 3 years. In the dMMR/MSI-H population of RUBY Part 1, analysis of progression-free survival by investigator assessment compared with blinded independent central review, sensitivity analyses of the source-verified population compared with the randomized population, and analysis of safety in this population were completed., Results: In total, 118 patients with dMMR/MSI-H were enrolled in the RUBY trial (53, dostarlimab arm; 65, placebo arm). At the first interim analysis, a 72% reduction in the risk of progression or death (P < 0.0001) was seen with dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel by investigator assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v1.1), which was consistent with blinded independent central review per RECIST v1.1. Likewise, sensitivity analyses of the source-verified dMMR/MSI-H population compared with the randomized dMMR/MSI-H population were consistent for progression-free survival and overall survival. Safety results seen in the dMMR/MSI-H population were similar to those previously reported for the overall population., Conclusions: All primary and secondary efficacy assessments demonstrate the consistent benefit of dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel. The improvements seen in survival and the manageable safety profile support the favorable benefit-risk profile for dostarlimab plus carboplatin-paclitaxel in patients with dMMR/MSI-H primary advanced or recurrent EC., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Matthew A. Powell reports grants/research support from GSK and honoraria/consultation fees from AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Eisai, GSK, ImmunoGen, and Merck. David Cibula reports participation on an advisory board from Akesobio, AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD, Novocure, Roche, Seagen, and Sotio. David M. O'Malley reports grants from Ajinomoto, BMS, Cerulean Pharma, GOG Foundation, INC Research, InVentiv Health Clinical, Iovance Biotherapeutics, Ludwig Cancer Research, New Mexico Cancer Care Alliance, PRA International, Serono, Stemcentrx, Tracon Pharmaceuticals, and Yale University; has been a consultant/advisory board member for AbbVie, Ambry, Amgen, Array Biopharma, Clovis Oncology, EMD Serono, Ergomed, Janssen/Johnson & Johnson, Myriad Genetics, Novocure, Regeneron, Tarveda, and VentiRx; was a member of a steering committee for Genentech/Roche and Merck; and received personal fees from Agenus, Eisai, GSK and ImmunoGen. Ingrid Boere reports institutional research grant from GSK and institutional advisory board meeting fees from AstraZeneca and GSK. Mark S. Shahin reports institutional grants from AstraZeneca, GSK, and Merck; honoraria from AstraZeneca, GSK, Merck, and Seagen; expert testimony fees from Robinson & Havens PSC, Lexington, KY; advisory board fees from Seagen; and board member for Unite for Her. Antonella Savarese reports institutional funding and provision of study materials from GSK and MSD; institutional funding and provision of study material for other clinical trials from GSK and MSD; honoraria from GSK and MSD; support for attending meetings and/or travel from GSK, MSD, and PharmaMar; and advisory board honoraria from Eisai and MSD. Dana M. Chase reports consultant fees from AstraZeneca and GSK and honoraria from AstraZeneca, GSK, ImmunoGen, and Seagen/Genmab. Lucy Gilbert reports institutional grants from Alkermes, AstraZeneca, Clovis Oncology, Corcept Therapeutics, Esperas, GOG Foundation, GSK, ImmunoGen, IMV, K-Group Beta, Karyopharm Therapeutics, MSD, Mersana Therapeutics, Novocure GmbH, OncoQuest Pharmaceuticals, Roche, Shattuck Labs, Sutro BioPharma, and Tesaro; consulting fees from GSK and Merck; honoraria from CanariaBio, Eisai, Eisai-Merck, GOG Foundation, GSK, ImmunoGen, Kora Healthcare, and Merck; travel support from EndomEra, GOG Foundation, GSK, Merck, and Zentalis; and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from CanariaBio, Eisai, Eisai-Merck, GOG Foundation, GSK, ImmunoGen, Kora Healthcare, and Merck. Destin Black reports institutional grant fees from GSK; fees for being a member of GOG Partners Investigational Council; and medical director/owner of Trials365, LLC. Jørn Herrstedt reports consultant fees from Elsai. Sudarshan Sharma has nothing to disclose. Stefan Kommoss reports grants from GSK; consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, GSK, MSD, and Roche; and participating on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for AstraZeneca, GSK, MSD, and Roche. Michael A. Gold has nothing to disclose. Anna M. Thijs has nothing to disclose. Kari Ring has nothing to disclose. Magnus Frödin Bolling reports press-release comment fees from GSK. Joseph Buscema reports honorarium for participation in an advisory committee from GSK. Sarah E. Gill has nothing to disclose. Paul Nowicki has nothing to disclose. Nicole Nevadunsky has nothing to disclose. Michael Callahan has nothing to disclose. Lyndsay Willmott reports speakers' bureau fees from AstraZeneca, Eisai, ImmunoGen, Merck, and Seagen and advisory board fees from AstraZeneca, ImmunoGen, and Seagen. Carolyn McCourt reports personal royalties <$200 annually from UpToDate and personal honoraria of $200 from the Washington University OB/Gyn annual symposium. Caroline Billingsley has nothing to disclose. Sharad A. Ghamande reports institutional fees from the Georgia Cancer Center for trial and consulting and speakers' bureau fees from GSK and Eisai. Zangdong He, Morad Marco Balas, and Shadi Stevens are employees of GSK. Evelyn Fleming has nothing to disclose. Mansoor Raza Mirza reports reports consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Biocad, GSK, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Merck, Roche, and Zailab; speakers' bureau fees from AstraZeneca and GSK; research funding (to institution) from Apexigen, AstraZeneca, Deciphera (trial chair), GSK, and Ultimovacs; and personal financial interest in Karyopharm Therapeutics (stocks/shares, member of board of directors)., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: Patients with TNM T1a cervical cancer have excellent prognosis; however, the risk for recurrence remains an issue of concern and management guidelines are based on limited data. Here we performed subgroup analysis of the Surveillance in Cervical Cancer (SCCAN) consortium with the objective of defining the prognosis of T1a cervical cancer patients., Methods: SCCAN was an international, multicentric, retrospective cohort study of patients with cervical cancer undergoing surgical treatment in tertiary centers. Inclusion criteria included: histologically confirmed cervical cancer treated between 2007 and 2016; TNM T1a; primary surgical management; and at least 1-year of follow-up data availability. Exclusion criteria included treatment with primary chemo-radiation, and missing treatment-related or clinical data., Results: Out of 975 patients included, 554 (57 %) were T1a1 and 421 (43 %) T1a2. The majority had squamous-cell carcinoma (78 %). 79 patients (8.1 %) had lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI). 455 patients (47 %) underwent radical hysterectomy/ parametrectomy. Laparoscopic and open surgery was performed in 401 (41 %) and in 361 (37 %) patients, respectively. Adjuvant treatment was administered to 56 patients (5.7 %). Assessment of lymph nodes (LN) was performed in 524 patients (54 %), with LN involvement found in 15 (2.9 %). There were 40 (4.1 %) recurrences, occurring at a median of 26 months (4-106), out of which 33 (82.5 %) occurred in pelvis. Among T1a1 cases, there were 10 recurrences (2.0 %) if LVSI was negative, and 3 recurrences (6.7 %) if LVSI was positive. Among T1a2 cases, there were 23 recurrences (6.7 %) if LVSI was negative, and 4 recurrences (5.1 %) if LVSI was positive. There were 3 recurrences in the LN+ group (recurrence rate 20 %)., Conclusions: The risk of recurrence in T1a cervical cancer was 4.1 % corresponding to the rates seen in patients with FIGO 1B cancer in recently published prospective trials. LN involvement represents a risk factor for disease recurrence. Our results indicate that stage T1a cervical cancer, apart from T1a1 LVSI negative disease, should follow the same principles in the management as that of FIGO stage 1B cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflicts of interest for this research publication., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim was to evaluate the performance of the Peritoneal Cancer Index (PCI) using imaging (ultrasound, contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and whole-body diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (WB-DWI/MRI) in assessing peritoneal carcinomatosis and predicting non-resectability in tubo-ovarian carcinoma patients., Methods: This was a prospective multicenter observational study. We considered all patients with suspected primary ovarian/tubal/peritoneal cancer who underwent preoperative ultrasound, CT, and WB-DWI/MRI (if available). The optimal cut off value for assessing the performance of the methods in predicting non-resectability was identified at the point at which the sensitivity and specificity were most similar. The reference standard to predict non-resectability was surgical outcome in terms of residual disease >1 cm or surgery not feasible. Agreement between imaging methods and surgical exploration in assessing sites included in the PCI score was evaluated using the Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC)., Results: 242 patients were included from January 2020 until November 2022. The optimal PCI cut-off for predicting non-resectability for surgical exploration was >12, which achieved the best AUC of 0.87, followed by ultrasound with a cut-off of >10 and AUC of 0.81, WB-DWI/MRI with a cut-off of >12 and AUC of 0.81, and CT with a cut-off of >11 and AUC of 0.74. Using ICC, ultrasound had very high agreement (0.94) with surgical PCI, while CT and WB-DWI/MRI had high agreement (0.86 and 0.87, respectively)., Conclusion: Ultrasound performed by an expert operator had the best agreement with surgical findings compared to WB-DWI/MRI and CT in assessing radiological PCI. In predicting non-resectability, ultrasound was non-inferior to CT, while its non-inferiority to WB-DWI/MRI was not demonstrated., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Fertility-sparing treatment (FST) for patients with cervical cancer intends to achieve oncologic outcomes comparable to those after radical treatment while maximizing reproductive outcomes, including the ability to conceive and minimizing the risk of prematurity., Methodology: International multicentre retrospective FERTISS study focused on patients treated with FST analysed timing of FST relative to pregnancy, conception attempts and methods, abortion rates, prophylactic procedures reducing the risk of severe prematurity, pregnancy duration, and delivery mode., Results: Of the 733 patients treated at 44 centres in 13 countries, 49.7% attempted to conceive during median follow-up of 72 months and 22.6% (166/733) patients achieved a successful pregnancy. Success rate was significantly higher after non-radical surgery (63.2%; 122/193) compared to radical trachelectomy (25.7%; 44/171, p < 0.001). Available perinatological data shows that 89.5% (111/124) of the patients became pregnant naturally. There was no significant difference in the abortion rate in the first pregnancy nor delivery success rates between non-radical and radical procedures patients. Preterm delivery (<38 weeks gestation) occurred more frequently after radical than non-radical procedures (76.5% vs. 57.7%, p = 0.15). Almost all patients (97.3%; 73/75) who underwent regular ultrasound cervicometry in pregnancy with subsequent prophylactic procedures delivered a live fetus, compared to 30.6% (15/49) women without such management, p < 0.001., Conclusion: Patients who underwent non-radical surgery had significantly higher pregnancy rates. Most pregnancies resulted in a viable fetus, but radical trachelectomy led to a higher rate of preterm births in the severe prematurity range. Half of the patients did not attempt pregnancy after FST., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To report the outcome of SLN staging in the SENTIX international prospective trial of SLN biopsy in patients with cervical cancer with an intensive ultrastaging protocol and central quality control and to evaluate how the intensity of pathological assessment correlates with metastatic detection rate in SLNs., Methods: Eligible were patients with stages T1a1/LVSI+ to T1b2 (<4 cm, ≤2 cm for fertility sparing), common tumor types, no suspicious lymph nodes on imaging, and bilateral SLN detection. SLNs were examined intraoperatively and processed by an intensive protocol for ultrastaging (paraffin blocks sectioned completely in 150-μm intervals/levels). SLNs from each site were submitted for central quality control., Results: In the SENTIX SLN study, 647 out of 733 enrolled patients underwent SLN ultrastaging, identifying 12.5% (81/647) with node positive, N1 cases. Intraoperative detection revealed metastases in 56.8% (46/81) of these cases, categorized into macrometastases (83.7%), micrometastases (26.3%), and isolated tumor cells (9.1%). Ultrastaging identified additional metastatic involvement in 43.2% (35/81) of patients, with detailed sectioning revealing metastases (MAC/MIC) at first level in 20 cases (24.7%), at levels 2-4 in 9 cases (11.1%), and at level ≥5 in 6 cases (7.4%)., Conclusion: SLN ultrastaging detects additional 43% of N1 (MAC/MIC) in patients with negative LNs by imaging and intraoperative pathological assessment. The detection rate of positive SLN correlates with the intensity (number of levels) of ultrastaging. Examination of four levels from paraffin blocks, which detects >90% of patients with N1, is a reasonable compromise for an international standard for ultrastaging., Study Registration: NCT02494063 (ClinicalTrials.gov)., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors report no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: The "intermediate-risk" (IR) group of early-stage cervical cancer patients is characterized by negative pelvic lymph nodes and a combination of tumor-related prognostic risk factors such as tumor size ≥2 cm, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), and deep stromal invasion. However, the role of adjuvant treatment in these patients remains controversial. We investigated whether adjuvant (chemo)radiation is associated with a survival benefit after radical surgery in patients with IR cervical cancer., Methods: We analyzed data from patients with IR cervical cancer (tumor size 2-4 cm plus LVSI OR tumor size >4 cm; N0; no parametrial invasion; clear surgical margins) who underwent primary curative-intent surgery between 2007 and 2016 and were retrospectively registered in the international multicenter Surveillance in Cervical CANcer (SCCAN) study., Results: Of 692 analyzed patients, 274 (39.6%) received no adjuvant treatment (AT-) and 418 (60.4%) received radiotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (AT+). The 5-year disease-free survival (83.2% and 80.3%; P DFS = 0.365) and overall survival (88.7% and 89.0%; P OS = 0.281) were not significantly different between the AT- and AT+ groups, respectively. Adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not associated with a survival benefit after adjusting for confounding factors by case-control propensity score matching or in subgroup analyses of patients with tumor size ≥4 cm and <4 cm. In univariable analysis, adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy was not identified as a prognostic factor in any of the subgroups (full cohort: P DFS = 0.365; P OS = 0.282)., Conclusion: Among patients with IR early-stage cervical cancer, radical surgery alone achieved equal disease-free and overall survival rates to those achieved by combining radical surgery with adjuvant (chemo)radiotherapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The term 'out-of-the-box surgery' in gynecologic oncology was recently coined to describe the resection of tumor growing out of the endopelvic cavity. In the specific case of pelvic sidewall involvement, a laterally extended pelvic resection may be required. As previously defined by Höckel, this resection requires the en bloc removal of structures including the pelvic sidewall muscles, bones, nerves, and/or major vessels. This complex radical procedure leads to tumor-free margins in more than 75% of the patients, with reliable functional results. The rate of recurrence and overall survival are directly correlated with clear resection margins. Progress in imaging, surgical techniques, and perioperative care currently offer the opportunity to attempt surgical curative resection in selected patients for whom palliative therapy was the only alternative. However, the procedure is associated with a high rate of major postoperative complications affecting up to 60% of patients. Multidisciplinary expert centers are the most likely to achieve this complex surgery with favorable oncological outcomes. The aim of this review is to summarize the key issues of out-of-the-box surgery in gynecologic cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Up to 26% of patients with early-stage cervical cancer experience relapse after primary surgery. However, little is known about which factors influence prognosis following disease recurrence. Therefore, our aims were to determine post-recurrence disease-specific survival (PR-DSS) and to identify respective prognostic factors for PR-DSS., Methods: Data from 528 patients with early-stage cervical cancer who relapsed after primary surgery performed between 2007 and 2016 were obtained from the SCANN study (Surveillance in Cervical CANcer). Factors related to the primary disease and recurrence were combined in a multivariable Cox proportional hazards model to predict PR-DSS., Results: The 5-year PR-DSS was 39.1% (95% confidence interval [CI] 22.7%-44.5%), median disease-free interval between primary surgery and recurrence (DFI1) was 1.5 years, and median survival after recurrence was 2.5 years. Six significant variables were identified in the multivariable analysis and were used to construct the prognostic model. Two were related to primary treatment (largest tumour size and lymphovascular space invasion) and four to recurrence (DFI1, age at recurrence, presence of symptoms, and recurrence type). The C-statistic after 10-fold cross-validation of prognostic model reached 0.701 (95% CI 0.675-0.727). Three risk-groups with significantly differing prognoses were identified, with 5-year PR-DSS rates of 81.8%, 44.6%, and 12.7%., Conclusions: We developed the robust model of PR-DSS to stratify patients with relapsed cervical cancer according to risk profiles using six routinely recorded prognostic markers. The model can be utilised in clinical practice to aid decision-making on the strategy of recurrence management, and to better inform the patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Outside the submitted work, Dr. Abu-Rustum reports grants from Stryker/Novadaq and GRAIL (paid to the institution). The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: In order to define the clinical significance of low-volume metastasis, a comprehensive meta-analysis of published data and individual data obtained from articles mentioning micrometastases (MIC) and isolated tumor cells (ITC) in cervical cancer was performed, with a follow up of at least 3 years., Methods: We performed a systematic literature review and meta-analysis, following Cochrane's review methods guide and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The primary outcome was the disease-free survival (DFS), and the secondary outcome was the overall survival (OS). The hazard ratio (HR) was taken as the measure of the association between the low-volume metastases (MIC+ITC and MIC alone) and DFS or OS; it quantified the hazard of an event in the MIC (+/- ITC) group compared to the hazard in node-negative (N0) patients. A random-effect meta-analysis model using the inverse variance method was selected for pooling. Forest plots were used to display the HRs and risk differences within individual trials and overall., Results: Eleven articles were finally retained for the meta-analysis. In the analysis of DFS in patients with low-volume metastasis (MIC + ITC), the HR was increased to 2.60 (1.55-4.34) in the case of low-volume metastasis vs. N0. The presence of MICs had a negative prognostic impact, with an HR of 4.10 (2.71-6.20) compared to N0. Moreover, this impact was worse than that of MIC pooled with ITCs. Concerning OS, the meta-analysis shows an HR of 5.65 (2.81-11.39) in the case of low-volume metastases vs. N0. The presence of MICs alone had a negative effect, with an HR of 6.94 (2.56-18.81)., Conclusions: In conclusion, the presence of MIC seems to be associated with a negative impact on both the DFS and OS and should be treated as MAC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Lower limb lymphoedema (LLL) is the most disabling adverse effect of surgical staging of pelvic lymph nodes. However, the lack of standardisation of volumetric LLL assessment hinders direct comparison between the studies and makes LLL reporting unreliable. The aim of our study is to report outcomes from a prospective trial that have implications for LLL assessment standardisation., Methods: In the prospective international multicentre trial SENTIX, a group of 150 patients with stage IA1-IB2 cervical cancer treated by uterine surgery with bilateral sentinel lymph node biopsy was prospectively evaluated by objective LLL assessment, based on limb volume change (LVC) using circumferrential limb measurements and subjective patient-reported swelling. The assessments were conducted in six-month periods over 24 months post-surgery., Results: Patient LVC substantially fluctuated in both positive and negative directions, which were comparable in frequency up to ±14% change. Thirty-eight patients experienced persistent LVC increase >10% classified as LLL, with nine months median time to onset. Some 34.2% of cases experienced onset later than one year after the surgery. Thirty-three patients (22%) experienced transient oedema characterised as LVC >10%, which resolved without intervention between two consequent follow-up visits. No significant correlation between LVC >10% and a patient-reported swelling was observed., Conclusions: Given that we observed comparable fluctuations of the the lower-limb volumes after surgical treatment of cervical cancer in both positive and negative direction up to ±14%, the diagnostic threshold for LLL diagnosis based on LVC should be increased to >15% LVC. The distinction of transient oedema from persistent LLL requires repeated measurements. Also, as one-third of LLL cases are diagnosed >1-year post-surgery, a sufficient follow-up duration needs to be ensured. Patient-reported swelling correlated poorly with LVC and should only be used as an adjunct to objective LLL assessment., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02494063., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None declared., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: DCVAC/OvCa is an active cellular immunotherapy designed to stimulate an immune response against ovarian cancer. We explored the safety and efficacy of DCVAC/OvCa plus carboplatin and gemcitabine in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer., Methods: In this open-label, parallel-group, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov number NCT02107950), patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer relapsing after first-line chemotherapy were randomized to DCVAC/OvCa and chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone. DCVAC/OvCa was administered every 3-6 weeks (10 doses). Endpoints included safety, progression-free survival (PFS; primary efficacy endpoint) and overall survival (OS; secondary efficacy endpoint)., Results: Between November 2013 and May 2015, 71 patients were randomized to chemotherapy in combination with DCVAC/OvCa or to chemotherapy alone. Treatment-emergent adverse events related to DCVAC/OvCa, leukapheresis and chemotherapy occurred in six (16.2%), two (5.4%), and 35 (94.6%) patients in the DCVAC/OvCa group. Chemotherapy-related events occurred in all patients in the chemotherapy group. Seven patients in the DCVAC/OvCa group were excluded from primary efficacy analyses due to failure to receive ≥1 dose of DCVAC/OvCa. PFS was not improved (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.42-1.28, P = 0.274, data maturity 78.1%). Median OS was significantly prolonged (by 13.4 months) in the DCVAC/OvCa group (HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.74, P = 0.003; data maturity 56.3%). A signal for enhanced surrogate antigen-specific T-cell activity was seen with DCVAC/OvCa., Conclusions: DCVAC/OvCa combined with chemotherapy had a favorable safety profile in patients with platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. DCVAC/OvCa did not improve PFS, but the exploratory analyses revealed OS prolongation and enhanced surrogate antigen-specific T-cell activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest BM: Honoraria for speeches and advisory role from Roche, Pfizer, BMS, Astellas, Novartis, Bayer, MSD, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Servier, AstraZeneca, Amgen, Janssen, Eisai, E. Lilly, Pierre Farbre, and travel support from BMS and Merck Serono. LG: Research funding from Lytix and Phosplatin, consulting/advisory honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca, OmniSEQ, The Longevity Labs, Inzen, and the Luke Heller TECPR2 Foundation. LP: Personal fees from SOTIO a.s., Daiichi Sankyo, and Beckman Coulter. PK: Consulting/advisory honoraria from SOTIO a.s. HIBH, JF, TH, MH: Employees of SOTIO a.s. JB: Employee of and holds stock in SOTIO a.s. RS: Employee of and holds stock in SOTIO a.s., and holds a patent for HHP killing of tumor cells. The other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: Voiding dysfunctions represent a leading morbidity after radical hysterectomy performed in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. The aim of this study was to perform ad hoc analysis of factors influencing voiding recovery in SENTIX (SENTinel lymph node biopsy in cervIX cancer) trial., Methods: The SENTIX trial (47 sites, 18 countries) is a prospective study on sentinel lymph node biopsy without pelvic lymphadenectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer. Overall, the data of 300 patients were analysed. Voiding recovery was defined as the number of days from surgery to bladder catheter/epicystostomy removal or to post-voiding urine residuum ≤50 mL., Results: The median voiding recovery time was three days (5th-95th percentile: 0-21): 235 (78.3%) patients recovered in <7 days and 293 (97.7%) in <30 days. Only seven (2.3%) patients recovered after >30 days. In the multivariate analysis, only previous pregnancy (p = 0.033) and type of parametrectomy (p < 0.001) significantly influenced voiding recovery >7 days post-surgery. Type-B parametrectomy was associated with a higher risk of delayed voiding recovery than type-C1 (OR = 4.69; p = 0.023 vs. OR = 3.62; p = 0.052, respectively), followed by type-C2 (OR = 5.84; p = 0.011). Both previous pregnancy and type C2 parametrectomy independently prolonged time to voiding recovery by two days., Conclusions: Time to voiding recovery is significantly related to previous pregnancy and type of parametrectomy but it is not influenced by surgical approach (open vs minimally invasive), age, or BMI. Type B parametrectomy, without direct visualisation of nerves, was associated with longer recovery than nerve-sparing type C1. Importantly, voiding dysfunctions after radical surgery are temporary, and the majority of the patients recover in less than 30 days, including patients after C2 parametrectomy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Authors do not have any conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy has been increasingly used in the management of early-stages cervical cancer instead of systematic pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND). The aim of this article is to give a critical overview of key aspects related to this concept, such as a necessity for reliable detection of micrometastases (MIC) in SLN and the requirements for SLN pathologic ultrastaging, low accuracy of intraoperative detection of SLN involvement, and still a limited evidence of oncological safety of the replacement of PLND by SLN biopsy only in ≥IB1 tumours due to unknown risk of MIC in non-SLN pelvic lymph nodes in patients with negative SLN, and absence of any prospective evidence., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The role of adjuvant radiotherapy for lymph node-negative stage IB patients with tumor-related negative prognostic factors is not uniformly accepted. It is advocated based on the GOG 92 trial, which was initiated in 1989. The aim of the current study is to report the oncological outcome of "intermediate risk" patients treated by tailored surgery without adjuvant radiotherapy. Data from two institutions that refer these patients for adjuvant radiotherapy served as a control group., Methods: Included were patients with stage IB cervical cancer treated with radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy, who had negative pelvic lymph nodes but a combination of negative prognostic factors adopted from the GOG 92 trial. Data were obtained from prospectively collected databases of three institutions. Radical surgery was a single-treatment modality in one of them and in the remaining two institutes it was followed by adjuvant chemoradiation., Results: In 127 patients who received only radical surgery, with a median follow-up of 6.1 years, the local recurrence rate was 1.6% (2 cases), and total recurrence was 6.3% (8 cases). Disease-specific survival at 5 years was 95.7% (91.9%; 99.4%) and 91% (83.7%; 98.3%) at 10 years. The only significant factor for disease-specific survival was tumor size ≥4 cm (P = 0.032). The recurrence rate, local control or overall survival did not differ from the control group. Adjuvant radiotherapy was not a significant prognostic factor within the whole cohort., Conclusions: An excellent oncological outcome, especially local control, can be achieved by both radical surgery or combined treatment in stage IB lymph node-negative cervical cancer patients with negative prognostic factors. The substantially better outcome than in the GOG 92 trial can be attributed to more accurate pre-operative and pathological staging and an improvement in surgical techniques., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Ovarian germ cell tumors (OGCT) are rare gynecological neoplasms, mostly affecting children and young women. The underlying molecular genetic background of these tumors is poorly characterized., Methods: We analyzed somatic copy number aberration (CNA) profiles in 87 OGCT tumors and performed whole exome sequencing (WES) on 24 OGCT tumor and matched germline samples to further elucidate their molecular genetic landscape., Results: The overall mutation rate was very low in OGCT compared to other human cancers, with an average of 0.05 mutations per Mb, consistent with their embryological origin. We identified recurrent mutations in KIT and KRAS, while CNA profiling revealed frequent focal amplifications affecting PIK3CA and AKT1 in yolk sac tumors, recurrent focal deletions affecting chromosomal regions 1p36.32, 2q11.1, 4q28.1, 5p15.33, 5q11.1 and 6q27, as well as gains in chromosome 12p that were present in all tumors, except for pure immature teratomas., Conclusion: We here present the first whole exome sequencing data and to our knowledge the largest CNA study in OGCT. We confirmed that earlier reported KIT mutations were frequent in dysgerminomas and mixed forms with a dysgerminoma component, whereas chromosome 12p gains were present in all histological subtypes except pure immature teratomas. We detected recurrent KRAS mutations, recurrent focal deletions and an enrichment in the PI3K/AKT/PTEN pathway in yolk sac tumors. Several of these aberrations involve targetable pathways, offering novel treatment modalities for OGCT., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a collagen-fibrin patch for the prevention of symptomatic lymphoceles after pelvic lymphadenectomy in women with gynecologic malignancies., Methods: In a multicenter, randomized, clinical trial, 164 women with pelvic lymphadenectomy were allocated either to bilateral pelvic application of two collagen-fibrin patches or no intervention. Main outcome was efficacy, defined as reduction of symptomatic lymphocele rate diagnosed within four weeks after surgery. Secondary outcomes were asymptomatic lymphoceles and subsequent interventions. Sample size was based on the assumption that application of a collagen-fibrin patch reduces the prevalence of symptomatic lymphoceles by at least 66%. The study was single-blinded, i.e., patients and primary outcome assessors, but not surgeons, were blinded to the treatment allocation., Results: A total of 75 women were randomized to the intervention and 89 to the control group. All women received the allocated intervention. In total, 42 (27.4%) lymphoceles and 8 (5.2%) symptomatic lymphoceles were observed. Symptomatic lymphoceles were observed in 5/68 (7.4%) women in the intervention group and 3/85 (3.5%) women in the control group (p = 0.47). Asymptomatic lymphoceles were observed in 16 (23.5%) women in the intervention group compared to 18 (21.2%) in the control group (p = 0.85). In a multivariate logistic regression model, no independent risk factor for the development of a symptomatic lymphocele was ascertained., Discussion: Intraoperative application of collagen-fibrin patches to the pelvic side walls does not reduce the incidence of symptomatic lymphoceles in women with gynecologic malignancies undergoing pelvic lymphadenectomy., (Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objective: The aim of our study was to describe oncological and obstetrical outcomes in patients who underwent less radical fertility-sparing surgical (FSS) procedures with omitted parametrectomy for cervical cancer., Methods: Included were women with cervical cancer stages IA2-IB2 who were under the age of 40 and desired future pregnancy. Patients underwent pelvic lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node biopsy. Node-negative cases underwent subsequent cervical surgery and were further analyzed. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) was administered in patients with tumors >2cm and/or involving >2/3 of cervical stroma. Simple vaginal trachelectomy or needle conization were performed according to tumor extent and topography. The follow-up period started once free surgical margins were reached., Results: Out of 44 women enrolled, 32 women (IA2=7, IB1=23, IB2=2) successfully completed FSS. NAC was administered in 9 (28.1%) cases. A simple trachelectomy was performed in 11 patients and needle conization in 21 patients. During the follow-up, 6 out of 32 women became pregnant. Of these, 1 miscarried and 5 successfully delivered. Disease recurred in 6 patients; 5 recurrences were central and 1 recurrence presented as an ovarian mass. Invasive cervical carcinoma, high-grade squamous intraepithelial (HSIL), and low-grade squamous intraepithelial (LSIL) lesions were detected in 4, 1 and 1 patients, respectively. Three of them received NAC. All events were detected within 16months after surgery., Conclusions: Nearly 27% of patients cannot complete FSS due to node positivity, progression during NAC, or involved margins. The total recurrence rate reached 18.8%, with the majority of invasive recurrences detected in patients after NAC followed by FSS. These patients represent cases at a higher risk of recurrence even if adequate free margins are reached by surgery. Nearly half of the cohort did not consider pregnancy in the near future because of personal reasons., (Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To identify the incidence of asymptomatic and symptomatic (i.e., causing pain, hydronephrosis, venous thrombosis, acute lymphedema of the lower or urinary urgency) lymphoceles, as well as risk factors for their development, through a prospective study of patients undergoing sole pelvic or combined pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer., Methods: Patients with endometrial, ovarian or cervical cancer scheduled for sole pelvic or combined pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy as a primary surgical treatment or salvage surgery for recurrence were enrolled at single institution from February 2006 to November 2010 and prospectively followed up with ultrasound., Results: Of 800 patients who underwent sole pelvic or combined pelvic and paraaortic lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer, the overall incidence of lymphoceles was 20.2%, with symptomatic lymphoceles occurring in 5.8% of all patients. Lymphoceles are predominantly located on the left pelvic side wall. Lymphadenectomy in ovarian cancer, a higher number of lymph nodes obtained (>27), and radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer were found to be independent risk factors for the development of symptomatic lymphoceles., Conclusions: The overall incidence of lymphocele development after lymphadenectomy for gynecological cancer remains high. However, the majority of lymphoceles are only incidental finding without clinical impact. A symptomatic lymphocele is an uncommon event, occurring in only 5.8% of patients. Symptomatic lymphoceles tend to develop earlier than asymptomatic. Although such risk factors are hard to avoid, patients known to be at an increased risk of developing symptomatic lymphoceles can be counseled appropriately and followed up for specific symptoms relating to lymphocele development., (Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To compare the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the preoperative assessment of early-stage cervical cancer using pathologic findings as the reference standard., Patients and Methods: Prospective multi-center trial enrolling 209 consecutive women with early-stage cervical cancer (FIGO IA2-IIA) scheduled for surgery. The following parameters were assessed on US and MRI and compared to pathology: remaining tumor, size, tumor stromal invasion<2/3 (superficial) or ≥2/3 (deep), and parametrial invasion., Results: Complete data were available for 182 patients. The agreement between US and pathology was excellent for detecting tumors, correctly classifying bulky tumors (>4cm), and detecting deep stromal invasion (kappa values 0.84, 0.82, and 0.81 respectively); and good for classifying small tumors (<2cm) and detecting parametrial invasion (kappa values 0.78 and 0.75, respectively). The agreement between MRI and histology was good for classifying tumors as <2cm, or >4cm, and detecting deep stromal invasion (kappa values 0.71, 0.76, and 0.77, respectively). It was moderately accurate in tumor detection, and in assessing parametrial invasion (kappa values 0.52 and 0.45, respectively). The agreement between histology and US was significantly better in assessing residual tumor (p<0.001) and parametrial invasion (p<0.001) than the results obtained by MRI. Imaging methods were not significantly influenced by previous cone biopsy., Conclusion: US and MRI are highly accurate for the preoperative assessment of women with early-stage cervical cancer, although US may be more accurate in detecting residual tumors and assessing parametrial invasion., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To evaluate the sensitivity of sentinel node (SN) ultrastaging and to define parameters that may reduce the overall false-negative rate in women with early-stage cervical cancer., Methods: We analyzed data from a large retrospective multicenter cohort group with FIGO stages IA-IIB cervical cancer in whom at least one SN was identified and systematic pelvic lymphadenectomy was uniformly performed. All who were SN negative by initial evaluation were subjected to ultrastaging., Results: In all, 645 patients were evaluable. SN were detected bilaterally in 72% of cases and unilaterally in 28%. Patients with optimal bilateral SN detection were significantly more likely to have any metastasis detected (33.3% vs. 19.2%; P<0.001) as well as micrometastasis detected in their SN (39.6% vs. 11.4%). SN ultrastaging resulted in a low overall false-negative rate of 2.8% (whole group) and an even lower false-negative rate of 1.3% for patients with optimal bilateral mapping. Patients with false-negative SN after ultrastaging had a higher prevalence of LVSI and more frequent unilateral SN detection. Sensitivity of SN ultrastaging was 91% (95% CI: 86%-95%) for the whole group and 97% (95% CI: 91%-99%) in the subgroup with bilateral SN detection., Conclusion: These data confirm previous observations that optimal bilateral SN detection substantially decreases the false negative rate of SN ultrastaging and increases detection of micrometastasis. In patients with bilateral SN detection, the sensitivity of SN ultrastaging is not reduced in more advanced stages of the disease. SN mapping and ultrastaging should become standard practice in the surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer., (Copyright © 2012 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Post-graduate training in oncogynecological surgery should be based on a comprehensive system with three main components: training centers, trainers and trainees. For each of these components, clearly defined requirements should be established. An international consensus on classification, terminology, and performance of standard procedures in gynecological oncology would further improve postgraduate training. One of the key features of this system should be continuous assessment of surgical and non-surgical skills that would make possible the evaluation of individual trainees' progress, as well as the quality of training centers and trainers. Special attention should be paid to the development of tailored educational tools. Internet databases of video presentations should be available to trainees, demonstrating standard procedures as well as atypical situations, including the management of complications. In Europe, the already available programs for postgraduate training and accreditation of centers developed by the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) should become the basis for harmonization of postgraduate training in gynecological oncology.

The abdominal radical trachelectomy is one of the available fertility-sparing techniques in the treatment of early-stage cervical cancer. The procedure follows the steps of the standard radical hysterectomy and therefore does not require special training. A radical abdominal trachelectomy allows for the adjustment of radicality of the parametrial resection according to prognostic factors and is not limited by distorted cervicovaginal anatomy. The key limitation for the procedure remains the cranial extent of the tumor towards the internal cervical os. Only a limited number of successful pregnancies have been reported to date. Poor fertility outcome, however, may partially be attributed to the selection of patients, requiring more extensive procedure, for the abdominal approach. The abdominal radical trachelectomy is a technique of choice, especially in centers with limited experience with vaginal radical surgery, and in certain specific indications, such as pediatric patients, distorted vaginal anatomy, bulky exophytic tumor, or cervical cancer in the first half of pregnancy. In this article, we describe the standard technique of this procedure along with alternatives, including a nerve-sparing modification of the parametrectomy.