1. Transition to quantitative faecal immunochemical testing from guaiac faecal occult blood testing in a fully rolled-out population-based national bowel screening programme
- Author
-
Alisson McPherson, Judith A. Strachan, Callum G. Fraser, Francis A. Carey, Annie S. Anderson, Robert Steele, Thomas G. Godfrey, Jess Brand, Audrey Irvine, and Gavin R. C. Clark
- Subjects
Adenoma ,Male ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Design data ,Colorectal cancer ,Colonoscopy ,Population based ,Gastroenterology ,Screening programme ,Feces ,Predictive Value of Tests ,Internal medicine ,medicine ,Humans ,Early Detection of Cancer ,Aged ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,Immunochemistry ,Faecal occult blood ,Middle Aged ,medicine.disease ,Predictive value ,digestive system diseases ,Colorectal cancer screening ,Occult Blood ,Female ,Indicators and Reagents ,business ,Colorectal Neoplasms ,Guaiac - Abstract
ObjectiveFaecal immunochemical tests (FIT) are replacing guaiac faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) in colorectal cancer (CRC) screening. Data from the first year of FIT screening were compared with those from FOBT screening and assumptions based on a pilot evaluation of FIT.DesignData on uptake, positivity, positive predictive value (PPV) for CRC and higher-risk adenoma from participants in the first year of the FIT-based Scottish Bowel Screening Programme (n=919 665), with a threshold of 80 µg Hb/g faeces, were compared with those from the penultimate year of the FOBT-based programme (n=862 165) and those from the FIT evaluation (n=66 225).ResultsOverall, uptake of FIT was 63.9% compared with 56.4% for FOBT. Positivity was 3.1% and 2.2% with FIT and FOBT; increases were seen in both sexes, and across age range and deprivation. More CRC and adenomas were detected by FIT, but the PPV for CRC was less (5.2% with FIT and 6.4% with FOBT). However, for higher-risk adenoma, PPV was greater with FIT (24.3% with FIT and 19.3% with FOBT). In the previous FIT evaluation, uptake was 58.5% with FIT compared with 54.0% with FOBT; positivity was 2.5% with FIT and 2.0% with FOBT.ConclusionTransition to FIT from FOBT produced higher uptake and positivity with lower PPV for CRC and higher PPV for adenoma. The FIT pilot evaluation underestimated uptake and positivity. Introducing FIT at the same threshold as the evaluation caused a 67.2% increase in colonoscopy demand instead of a predicted 10%. more...
- Published
- 2019