Search

Purpose: The aim of this study is to compare optical quality results obtained in laboratory analysis (in vitro) versus clinical data (in vivo). Methods: The optical quality of ISOPure intraocular lens was assessed both in vitro and in vivo using the modulation transfer function (MTF) for 3.0 and 4.5 mm pupil diameters. In vitro measurements were obtained using deflectometer NIMO TRF1504, while in vivo measurements were taken with OPD-Scan III in a set of patients implanted with this lens. Ray tracing techniques were used to determine the MTF and area under MTF curve (MTFa) from the measured wavefront for the isolated lens and for the whole eye. Results: The MTF of the isolated lens obtained under both in vitro and in vivo conditions showed comparable results for both pupil sizes. However, differences were found when comparing the MTF of the whole eye with the lens implanted versus the MTF measured in vitro for 4.5 mm pupil size. Also, the MTFa defocus curve was compared with the defocus curve measured in vivo. Conclusion: The defocus curve from the in vivo study aligns closely with the MTFa of the in vitro model, with a useful defocus range of 0.40D. Thus, it is possible to anticipate the visual results of the implanted isofocal lens by using measurements on an optical bench and conducting optical simulations. Key messages: What is known • Extended depth of focus (EDoF) lenses are prominent for expanding vision range in pseudophakic eyes, exceeding traditional limits. • The ISOPure lens is characterized as a bi-aspheric refractive design that produces an extended depth of focus design. What is new • The MTF of the isolated lens obtained under both in vitro and in vivo conditions showed comparable results. • The defocus curve from the in vivo study aligns closely with the MTFa of the in vitro model, with a useful defocus range of 0.40D. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study is to evaluate the optical characteristics of a non-diffractive wavefront-shaping intraocular lens which incorporates surface refractive modifications for shaping the wavefront in order to achieve extended depth of focus (EDoF) and to assess whether the nominal power of this IOL influences the attainable add power. Methods: A commercially available optical bench NIMO TR1504 device (LAMBDA-X, Nivelles, Belgium) was employed to obtain full optical characterization of three non-diffractive EDoF intraocular lenses with + 10 D, + 20 D, and + 30 D powers. After NIMO measurements, data were computed using a custom-made MATLAB program (Mathworks, Inc., Natick, MA, USA) to evaluate the optical quality functions, such as the point spread function (PSF), wavefront profiles, and modulation transfer function (MTF) for two pupil sizes: 3 mm and 4.0 mm. Results: The non-diffractive EDoF intraocular lens showed a central serrated power profile behavior with additions of + 2.00 to + 2.50 D over the nominal power. Higher order aberrations were found to be driven mainly by the spherical aberration, with almost null comatic influence. Optical quality metrics showed good values, better for a 3 mm pupil compared to a 4.5 mm one, as expected. The three IOL powers tested showed a very similar behavior in terms of power and aberrometric profiles, with minimal to null differences related to the nominal power. Conclusion: The non-diffractive wavefront-shaping EDoF intraocular lens achieves a near addition up to + 2.50 D aiming for an extended range of vision, almost independently of the base power. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To report patient satisfaction after unilateral/bilateral extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) intraocular lens (IOL) implantation in a young population after vitrectomy. Methods: Patients that underwent phaco-vitrectomy or phaco following vitrectomy with an AT LARA EDOF IOL, aged between 18 and 75 years, were asked to fill out a questionnaire to assess overall visual quality, near vision quality, and visual disturbances. The questionnaire was based on the Catquest, NAVQ, and APPLES questionnaires. Results: A total of 89 participants (average age 56.7 years) filled out the questionnaire of which 53.9% received a unilateral EDOF IOL. The most common indications for vitrectomy were retinal detachments (38.2%), floaters (36.0%), and epiretinal membranes (16.9%). The Catquest and NAVQ score respectively showed a good overall satisfaction (3.44/4.0), a good intermediate vision (3.55/4.0), and an average near vision (2.75/4.0). The APPLES score showed acceptable visual disturbances. There were no differences between the unilateral and bilateral group, except for a higher spectacle dependency in the unilateral group (40% vs. 10.6%). Participants that underwent vitrectomy in case of floaters reported lower satisfaction rates. Other variables, like the pre-operative refraction, had no impact on both satisfaction and visual disturbances. Conclusion: Both unilateral and bilateral implantation of the AT LARA EDOF IOL showed a high satisfaction with no differences between both groups, except for a lower spectacle use in the latter. Hence, The AT LARA seems to be a possible choice in patients undergoing vitrectomy at a younger age, even for unilateral use. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Accurate intraocular lens (IOL) calculation in subjects with irregular astigmatism is challenging. This study evaluated the accuracy of using Scheimpflug-derived central 2-mm equivalent keratometry reading (EKR) values for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism. Methods: This retrospective study included subjects (31 eyes of 30 patients) who underwent cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods. We compared prediction error (PE) and absolute PE (APE) outcomes using SRK/T and Barrett Universal II formulas for keratometry data obtained from the IOLMaster 500 and Pentacam (anterior corneal sim k) devices. Results: Cataract surgery and IOL calculation using the 2-mm central EKR methods resulted in improved visual acuity (uncorrected: from 1.13 ± 0.38 to 0.65 ± 0.46 logMar, p < 0.01; best-corrected: from 0.45 ± 0.24 to 0.26 ± 0.20 logMar, p < 0.01) after surgery. The percentage of subjects with best-corrected visual acuity of 6/6 was 22%, < 6/9 was 58%, and < 6/12 was 71%. For both the SRK/T and the Barrett formulas, the PE was similar to those obtained by IOLMaster (> 0.14) but lower than those obtained by the anterior corneal sim k (p < 0.02). IOLMaster provided keratometry reading in only 23/31 (74.1%) of cases. Conclusions: The use of Scheimpflug central 2-mm EKR for IOL calculation in irregular astigmatism was beneficial in terms of visual acuity improvement. It had comparable refractive prediction performance to the IOLMaster 500 and better than the anterior corneal sim K. The 2-mm EKR method can be used when IOLMaster cannot provide a reliable reading in abnormal corneas. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Extended depth-of-focus (EDOF) is a promising intraocular lens (IOL) technology for cataract surgery. The aim of the study was to report the real-life experience related to the implant of EDOF AcrySof® IQ Vivity® (Alcon Inc., USA) IOL. Methods: The study was designed as a interventional, prospective, case series with 3 months of follow-up. Patients needing cataract surgery, without any other kind of ocular diseases, were recruited and implanted with AcrySof® IQ Vivity® IOL. We evaluated the refractive success of this IOL through complete ophthalmologic assessments and the administration of the Quality of Vision test. The main outcome measures were the refractive outcome; far, intermediate, and near vision; and Quality of Vision score. Results: We included 108 eyes (54 patients; age 62 ± 5 years). Intra-operative and post-operative complications were 0%. Thirty out of 100 eyes (28%) required toric IOL. Best-corrected visual acuity improved from 0.4 ± 0.3 LogMAR to 0.0 ± 0.0 LogMAR (p < 0.01). Refractive outcome was very good for far and intermediate visions, whereas a spherical addition of at least + 1.0D was required for near vision. The mean Quality of Vision score was of 15.5 ± 6.5. The most complained visual disturbances were haloes and glares, although resulting well-tolerated. Dynamic pupillometry findings well-correlated with the amount of complained post-operative visual discomforts. Conclusions: AcrySof® IQ Vivity® IOL is a well-tolerated choice to correct far and intermediate vision. Spectacles are needed to optimize near vision. Our data strongly suggest dynamic pupillometry as a useful investigation to optimize post-operative refractive success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Long-term outcomes of intraocular lens (IOL) implantation for congenital cataract in children under 2 years old are still undetermined. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all cases of bilateral congenital cataract who had undergone simultaneous bilateral cataract removal with posterior capsulotomy and central anterior vitrectomy between 1990 and 2010. Patients randomly underwent primary IOL implantation or secondary IOL implantation after a period of contact lens wear. The two groups were compared for visual outcome and complications during follow-up. Results: Cataract removal and primary IOL implantation was performed in 30 eyes (15 patients; nine males, six females) at a mean age of 6.8 ± 4.2 months. After 79.31 ± 63.4 months, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was 0.53 ± 0.36 EDTRS LogMAR. In 36 eyes (18 patients, 11 males, seven females) the lens was removed at a mean age of 5.42 ± 2.80 months, and after 32.0 ± 6.1 months of contact lens utilization, secondary IOL implantation was performed. After 109.0 ± 33.8 months, BCVA was 0.54 ± 0.4 ETDRS LogMAR. The association between age at surgery and final visual acuity and the difference between the two groups concerning type of cataract at baseline, BCVA and refractive error at last visit, incidence of posterior capsular opacification, glaucoma, strabismus, and nystagmus during follow-up were not significant ( p > 0.05). Myopic shift was more frequent in eyes undergone primary IOL implantation ( p < 0.001). Conclusions: Similar visual outcome and complications were observed during long-term follow-up after both primary and secondary IOL implantation following simultaneous bilateral congenital cataract removal with posterior capsulotomy and central anterior vitrectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Physical properties of intraocular lens (IOL) surfaces determine biocompatibility. IOL hydrophobicity of commercially available IOLs with and without fibronectin (FN) coating can be determined by surface contact angle (SCA) measurements. SCA data of IOLs may allow for a rational selection of an IOL type as a function of underlying eye disease. University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg (Saar), Germany Thirteen IOL types were tested. IOLs were made of poly(methyl methacrylate)(PMMA), acrylate, or silicone. Select IOLs were surface modified by the manufacturer with heparin or a polysaccharide coating. SCA values of IOLs, either uncoated or precoated with FN, were determined using the sessile water drop method. SCA values ranged from 61.3 to 116.1° for unmodified IOLs, with PMMA IOLs being more hydrophilic (median SCA, 74.1°), silicone IOLs more hydrophobic (median SCA, 113.3°), and acrylate IOLs intermediate (median SCA, 86.6°). Upon FN coating, all genuine acrylate lenses became significantly more hydrophilic while this effect was either nonsignificant or opposite on some PMMA and silicon IOLs. Heparin or polysaccharide surface modification resulted in significantly reduced SCA values. On acrylate IOLs, SCA values did not correlate with the aqueous content of the material. This study associates IOL materials, surface modifications, and the role of FN preadsorption with SCA values reflecting surface hydrophobicity versus hydrophilicity. It provides a rationale for specific IOL selection as a function of the clinical setting, and a basis for IOL development using tailored surface physicochemistry to enhance biocompatibility and to reduce susceptibility to implant infection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]