Search

The article discusses "American Indian Stories," by Zitkala-Sa (Gertrude Simmons Bonnin), from the perspective of queer theory. The author argues that "American Indian Stories" is a queer text that chronicles American sexual history, critiques federal Indian policy for its compulsory heterosexuality, and relates to the Sioux social identity. Dakota Indian education focused on kinship rules while the U.S. education policy under Indian affairs commissioner, Thomas J. Morgan, emphasized "individualization" and standardization of the boarding school system in the late 1800s. The views of Cathy J. Cohen and Will Roscoe are mentioned in the discussion of the United States' Indian policy, heteronormative society, indigenous sex and gender diversity, and "heterosexual binarism." The family structure and social network described in "American Indian Stories" are examined, including the role of "winkte" men.

The article mentions statistics from the 1998 "Sex in Sweden" survey and focuses on how quantifying sexual practices can lead to pathologizing a group such as those who transgress societal norms by paying for sex. The author provides historical and legal background for the concept of "good sex" in Sweden. The deployment of sexuality, the entrenchment of an official sexuality, the difference between sexuality as behavior and sexuality as identity are ideas that are referred to in this article. The ideology, jämställdhet, which demands a clear demarcation in male and female identity and provides gender parity in Swedish political culture, is a product of 1970s radical feminism, is meant to eliminate gender imbalances in society, and promotes heteronormativity. The author also discusses prostitution in Sweden, client typology, and the transition of "client" into "species".

The article focuses on the homosexual panic, created by queer theory, that spurs the promotion of heterosexuality in the United States. The defensive response to radical feminist, lesbian, and gay critique of heterosexual hegemony aims at renaturalization of heteronormative gender differences. Queer heterosexual discourse and the contradictory figure of queer straights have roles in sexual normativity and the destabilization of sexual identities. Queer theory critiques a cultural system that regulates sexual identity, produces heterosexual privilege, and tries to maintain a heterosexual ideal.