Search

The need to assess clinical competencies in a medical environment is an intriguing issue due to progressive involvement of young physicians in clinical practice, as well as for connections tied to evaluation systems to define postgraduate training and career progression. To reach this goal, system must be based upon contributions that are aimed to achieve a clear and homogeneous evaluation pathway and strictly related to the continuing medical education institution (credits). All these presuppositions are instrumental for the proposal of a sheet which could allow a data retrieval useful to depict a career progression by means of: identification of reproducible parameters along with clear standards; advices for indicators; objective judgments that could drive to a score meaningful for reaching higher steps in the performance evaluation. This work had been carried out at Local Health Authority 1 of Cuneo (ASLCN1) from 2014 to 2017 in order to provide a widely usable evaluation framework for all the medical workers. Aim of this work is thus to show up an original methodology, as much as possible based upon objective items, related to the professional improvement of a nephrologist working in Hospital and following him along his clinical course., (Copyright by Società Italiana di Nefrologia SIN, Rome, Italy.)

The Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome (LGS) is a childhood epileptic encephalopathy. Incidence: 1/1.000.000/year, prevalence: 15/100.000. LGS covers 5-10% of epileptic patients and 1-2% of childhood epilepsies. Also referred to as cryptogenic or symptomatic generalized epilepsy. LGS is characterized by: multiple seizures (atypical absences, axial tonic seizures and sudden atonic or myoclonic falls), diffuse slow cryptic EEG waves when awake (<3 Hz), fast rhythmic peaks (10 Hz) during sleep, mental retardation and personality disorders. The LGS is not responding to treatment. Some new drugs have proven to be effective in controlling the disease (Felbamate, Lamotrigine, Topiramate, Levetiracetam). The mortality rate is about 5%; only rarely death is due to epilepsy, which is usually caused by stroke or epileptic episodes. Here we describe the case of a 45-year-old female patient with LGS, severe hypokalemia, mental retardation and focal seizures. Normal renal function: creatinine 0.9 mg/dl, urea 26 mg/dl, creatinine clearance 96 ml/min, serum potassium levels to the minimum: 3.5 mEq/L. This level of potassium, however, had been achieved with the assumption of 8 oral tablets/day of potassium chloride. Osmotic diuresis, use of diuretics, Bartter, Gitelman (normal urinary calcium and magnesium) and pseudo-Bartter syndromes were all excluded whereas aldosteronism was found. Our findings lead to hypokalemia related to assumption of topiramate and hyperaldosteronism. Reduction in drug intake was not effective due to the increased seizures, so the drug was maintained, along with potassium supplementation. In conclusion, the patient has been diagnosed with hypokalemia and iatrogenic hyperaldosteronism, rare in our outpatient practice.

Gabapentin (GBP) is a drug with different indications.Is not metabolized and is excreted by the kidney. The common side effects are: arthralgia, myalgia, fatigue, dizziness and ataxia. Rhabdomyolysis is an extremely rare side effect. This latter, that can be caused by trauma, strenuous exercise, infections, drugs and toxins, is a syndrome characterized by loss of skeletal muscle resulting in the release of myocyte components in the circulation. Following a case of rhabdomyolysis caused by GBP in patient with chronic renal failure (CRF). A 65-year-old diabetic men, in peritoneal dialysis (PD), affected by ischemic and hypokinetic cardiomyopathy, sensorimotor neuropathy. The patient reported: weakness, diffuse myalgias, hypotension. He had been taking GBP for three days, after the failure of therapies with tricyclic antidepressants, opioids and NSAIDs. Laboratory tests confirmed the increase of the indices of muscle necrosis.The immediate withdrawal of the drug in association with CAPD dialysis treatment, led to improvement of the clinical and biochemical parameters. During the last 10 years, 3 cases of rhabdomyolysis referred to the assumption of GBP have been reported. The use of PD for treatment of acute renal failure, has been significantly reduced over the years. The effectiveness of the purification method is much lower than the one with the continuous extracorporeal treatments. In conclusion, GBP may be associated with rhabdomyolysis. Since GBP toxicity in CRF patients is often overlooked, a better awareness of this phenomenon and a thorough follow-up of laboratory tests to detect any possible early adverse reaction is suggested.

The Piedmont Group of Clinical Nephrology compared the activity of 18 nephrology centers in Piedmont and Aosta Valley as regards acute pielonephritis (APN). Data from more than 500 cases per year of APN were examined. The microbial spectrum of APN consists mainly of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae. Diagnosis was based on both clinical and radiological criteria in most of the centers (computed tomography-CT o Magnetic Resonance Imaging-MRI). In four centers diagnosis was made with the radiological criteria and in one center only with the clinical features. CT and MRI were performed in about 47% and 44% of cases respectively. Urine culture was positive in 22 up to 100% of cases. The most commonly used antibiotics were fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin or levofloxacin) and ceftriaxone (50% of centers) or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid (25% of centers). In 75% of the centers, patients received a combination of two antibiotics (aminoglycoside in 22% of them ). In 72% of the centers, almost 50% of the patients were re-examined, while 38.8% of centers re-examined all the patients. Renal ultrasound was inappropriate to identify abscesses. The mean of patients in whom renal abscesses were detected by CT or MRI was 18.2%. The analysis shows a high variability in the way of diagnosing and treating APN in Piedmont and Aosta Valley regions. This suggests that even if APN is a frequent pathological condition, practical recommendations are required.

Prune-Belly Syndrome (PBS) is a rare congenital syndrome characterized by the absence of abdominal muscles, anomalies in the urinary tract, megaureter, cryptorchidism or testicular agenesis, hypertension and worsening chronic kidney disease (CKD). The incidence is estimated between 1 out of 35,000 and 1 out of 50,000 born alive, and it affects males in prevalence (97%). In the present study we describe the case of a 38 year old male patient (followed since May 2011) affected by PBS, CKD, one functional kidney at the scintigraphy, pediatric testicular implants, bladder surgery and correction of pectus excavatum. At the beginning of the observation, renal function was deteriorated, with a creatinine 3.3 mg/dl, GFR calculated at MDRD 23 ml/min, proteinuria in nephrotic range (4 g/day), high blood pressure, anemia and hyperparathyroidism. In the following examinations renal function framework worsened, despite the adoption of a low-protein diet. Due to the functional trend, the patient was prescribed hemodialysis as substitute treatment. In January 2013 a first attempt of artero-venous fistula (AVF) did not succeed, while a new AVF in March 2013 resulted effective. In July hemodialysis was started. In the future, we expect to insert the patient in the Kidney Transplant List (since surgical feasibility has already been positively evaluated). Our case is quite peculiar due to the late beginning of substitute treatment. Further, SPB represents a challenge that, in the absence of a prompt and effective treatment, inevitably it leads to terminal uremia; nevertheless, given a proper treatment, a transplant with good chances of success can be envisaged.

Nowadays the choice to start with a renal replacement therapy (or its withdrawal once begun) is a critical issue leading to review the paradigm of constantly treating terminal uremia by means of dialysis technologies, without caring for effective prognosis nor for patients preferences, in a more affordable physician-patient relationship. Furthermore dialysis patients mean age is increasing and such population bears the burden of comorbidities that seriously affect survival and quality of life. In any case, dialysis withdrawing does not mean neglecting the patient: the start, or continuation of a very low protein diet program may represent a reasonable alternative, not only for uremic symptoms control but also providing a slowing of disease progression (at least postponing further the start of renal replacement therapy). Basically, in our opinion, the decision to start dialysis in an eligible patient, mainly in the elderly or frails, it should be driven by an adequate balance among all the factors. These factors play a role not only concerning survival, but also in life quality issues and patients preferences. Thus, we argue that ethical issues must be taken into account as well as compelling clinical factors which usually nephrologists refer to. To pursue this goal, it could be useful to set up specific educational pathways addressed to physicians, nurses and technicians of renal units. It also could be instrumental in developing new strategies to manage end stage renal failure, considering not only hospital facilities,but also nursing and patients homes. Incoming guidelines could help nephrologists in improving their behaviors to face these new issues.

In 2010 a questionnaire was administered to the renal units of Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta to analyze their procedures for renal biopsy (RB). Seventy-eight percent of units performed RBs, 57% for more than 20 years, but only 43% performed at least 20 BRs per year. 20/21 units performed RB in an inpatient setting and 1/21 in day hospital with the patient remaining under observation the night after. Thirty-two percent did not consider a single kidney as a contraindication to RB, 59% considered it a relative contraindication and 9% considered it an absolute contraindication. In 90.5% of units there was a specific protocol for patient preparation for RB and 86% used a specific informed consent form. Ninety-five percent of units performed ultrasound-guided RB, 60% of them using needle guides attached to the probe. In 81% of units the left side was preferred; 71% put a pillow under the patient's abdomen. All units used disposable, automated or semi-automated needles. Needle size was 16G in 29%, 18G in 58%, and both 16G and 18G in 14% of units; 1 to 3 samples were drawn. One third of units had a microscope available for immediate evaluation of specimen adequacy. After RB, 86% of units kept patients in the prone position for 2-6 hours and all prescribed a period of bed rest (at least 24 hours in 90.5%). 90.5% of units followed a specific postbiopsy observation protocol consisting of blood pressure, heart rate and red blood cell measurements at different times, and urine monitoring and ultrasound control within 12-24 hours (only half of them also employing color Doppler). One third of all units discharged patients after 1 day and two thirds after 2-3 days; all prescribed abstention from effort and from antiplatelet drugs for 7-15 days. In 9 units both RB and tissue processing and examination were done in the same hospital, while 12 units sent the samples elsewhere. 76% obtained results in 2-4 days, 19% in 6-7 days, and 5% in 10-15 days. Less than 20% of the interviewed operators were fully familiar with the clauses of hospital insurance securing their activity. Use of RB is widespread in Piedmont and Valle d'Aosta but its practice shows variation between centers.

The Piedmont Group of Clinical Nephrology has compared the activity of 18 nephrology centers in the region Piedmont/Valle d'Aosta with regard to renal biopsy (RB). Data on the RBs performed in every nephrology unit, taking into account their entire experience (in some cases spanning more than 30 years), were analyzed. 3396 RBs were performed between 1996 and 2011. Thirty to forty percent were done in patients aged >-65 years (1568 in patients >-65 years, 29 in patients >-85 years). 598 BRs were performed in children over the last 20 years. The following contraindications to RB were considered: chronic renal failure by 8 centers (44.4%), serum creatinine (SCr >3 mg/dL) by 3 centers, longitudinal renal size <8 cm by 3 centers, and renal cortex thickness <1 cm by 2 centers. 1798 RBs were performed in patients with SCr >2 mg/dL and 275 in patients on dialysis. The percentage of RBs performed in patients with SCr >2 mg/dL ranged from 27% to 55% between centers. As regards RB in the course of acute renal failure in an ANCA-positive context, 4 centers allowed administration of corticosteroids and 8 centers administration of immunosuppressive treatment as well, even in the absence of histological data. In drug-related nephropathies, RB was considered indicated to confirm the farhypothesis of immunoallergic interstitial nephropathy either if the responsible drug was not among the traditional ones known to induce tubulo-interstitial renal disease or if the pharmacological hypothesis seemed no longer sufficient to justify the renal presentation. All centers but one were against performing RB in case of atheroembolic disease. Three centers performed RB in the intensive care unit. As regards RB in patients undergoing treatment with anticoagulants, aspirin was discontinued 5-14 days before the procedure (mean 8 days) and given again 7-15 days afterwards (mean 11.4 days). Ten centers replaced the anticoagulants with low-dose heparin, which was discontinued the day before the procedure; 11 centers asked advice from cardiologists. RB was repeated in 113 cases after a delay of 1 month to 8 years from the first RB. Our analysis shows uniformity in the approach to RB in this Italian region, with some differences compared with the literature: particular attention was paid to severely critical patients, elderly patients, and patients treated with anticoagulant drugs.

The treatment of mixed cryoglobulinemia concurrent with HCV infection is still under debate. We report the case of a patient referred to our unit for a membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis associated with HCV infection. A nephrotic syndrome and a slight reduction of glomerular filtration rate were present. We treated him with alpha-interferon for six months and prednisone for two months. We achieved a remission of the nephrotic syndrome without any significant reduction of the viral load. One year after the therapy had been suspended, the nephrotic syndrome relapsed and subsequently responded to a combined treatment with interferon ribavirin and prednisone. HCV-RNA became suddenly and persistently negative.