Search

Background and Objectives: Nonpharmacologic interventions have demonstrated benefits for people living with dementia and their caregivers. Few studies have evaluated their implementation in real-world settings. Using normalization process theory (NPT), an implementation science framework, this study evaluated the acceptability of the care of persons with dementia in their environments (COPE) intervention by care managers and interventionists implemented in a Medicaid and state-revenue funded home and community-based services (HCBS) program., Research Design and Methods: NPT and data from 9 care manager focus groups (n = 61) and 2 interventionist focus groups (n = 8) were utilized to understand COPE acceptability to program care managers and interventionists. NPT's 4 criteria, coherence, cognitive participation, collective action, and reflexive monitoring, framed the research questions used to evaluate the intervention's implementation., Results: Care managers and interventionists demonstrated a shared understanding of COPE aims and the value of practices implemented (coherence). Training by national experts facilitated program buy-in to meet COPE goals and was demonstrated by care managers and interventionists as they used the training to broaden their program involvement (cognitive participation). Operational work done by care managers and interventionists to implement the intervention (collective action) and their shared perceptions of program benefits (reflexive monitoring) contributed to program implementation, families' positive responses to COPE and enhanced sustainability., Discussion and Implications: Introducing evidence-based dementia care interventions into HCBS programs strongly depends upon building shared understandings between care managers and interventionists and valuing the contributions of all stakeholders involved in delivering care innovations to people living with dementia and their caregivers., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Purpose of the Study: Little is known about adults' future planning for long-term supports and services (LTSS), and no studies have examined how LTSS planning compares between Baby Boomers and their parents' generation. The primary aim of this study is to examine the potential influences of birth cohort and gender on LTSS planning. Drawing on Andersen's Behavioral Model of Health Services Use, birth cohort and gender are viewed as predisposing characteristics, and several additional predisposing, enabling, and need characteristics are included as independent variables., Design and Methods: Cross-sectional design; data obtained from a statewide survey of 2,522 randomly selected Baby Boomers (born between 1946 and 1964) and older adults (born before 1946)., Results: Two thirds of respondents expected to need LTSS, but few reported saving for such services. Controlling for other independent variables, compared with older adults, Baby Boomers were significantly more likely to plan to move to an apartment, live in a retirement community or assisted living, and live with an adult child. Conversely, women were more likely than men to report planning to use specific LTSS such as homecare, but specific LTSS plans did not vary by birth cohort., Implications: Policymakers and providers should prepare for a shift in community planning to accommodate the changing plans and expectations of Baby Boomers, large numbers of whom plan to age in existing homes and retirement communities, or live with adult children, with increasing demand for informal family support. The LTSS industry should also adapt to meet the need for formal services, which will likely continue to grow.

Purpose: Although prior research suggests that economic, behavioral, and psychosocial factors influence decisions not to purchase long-term care insurance, few studies have examined the interplay among these factors in depth and from the consumer's point of view. This study was intended to further illuminate these considerations, generate hypotheses about non-purchasing decisions, and inform the design of policies that are responsive to concerns and preferences of potential purchasers., Design and Method: Qualitative study using 32 in-depth interviews and 6 focus groups, following a grounded theory approach., Results: Five themes characterize decisions not to purchase long-term care insurance: (a) the determination that a policy is "too costly" reflects highly individualized and complex trade-offs not solely economic in nature, (b) non-purchasers are skeptical about the viability and integrity of private insurance companies and seek an unbiased source of information, (c) family dynamics play an important role in insurance decisions, (d) contemplating personal risk for long-term care triggers psychological responses that have implications for decision making, and (e) non-purchasers feel inadequately informed and overwhelmed by the process of deciding whether to purchase long-term care insurance., Implications: States are seeking to offset escalating Medicaid long-term care expenditures through a variety of policy mechanisms, including stimulating individual purchase of long-term care insurance. Findings suggest that economic incentives such as lowering premiums will be necessary but not sufficient to attract appropriate candidates. Attention to behavioral and psychosocial factors is essential to designing incentives that are responsive to concerns and preferences of potential purchasers.

Purpose: This article reports the results of a randomized, controlled evaluation of Partners in Caregiving in a Special Care Environment, an intervention designed to improve communication and cooperation between staff and families of residents in nursing home dementia programs., Design and Methods: Participants included 388 family members and 384 nursing staff members recruited from 20 nursing homes, randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions. Project staff conducted training sessions on communication and conflict-resolution techniques with two groups at the intervention sites: staff and residents' family members, followed by a joint meeting with facility administrators., Results: Families, staff, residents, and facility programs in the intervention facilities all demonstrated positive outcomes from program participation. Families experienced significant improvement in communicating with staff and in staff behaviors toward them, and spouses of residents increased their care involvement. Staff reported reduced conflict with families and reduced depression; burnout for nurses increased for individuals in the control group but not those in the treatment group. Behavioral symptoms decreased for residents, and facilities implemented more family-focused programs., Implications: Effective staff and family partnerships are critical in caring for residents with dementia. The Partners in Caregiving in a Special Care Environment program is an evidence-based intervention that enables these partnerships to develop and thrive, translating into improved experiences for residents, families, and staff.

Purpose: This article reports on a randomized, controlled study of Partners in Caregiving, an intervention designed to increase cooperation and effective communication between family members and nursing home staff., Design and Methods: Participants included 932 relatives and 655 staff members recruited from 20 nursing homes, randomly assigned to treatment and control conditions. Parallel training sessions on communication and conflict resolution techniques were conducted with the family and staff in the treatment group, followed by a joint meeting with facility administrators., Results: Positive outcomes were found for both family and staff members in the treatment group. Both groups showed improved attitudes toward each other, families of residents with dementia reported less conflict with staff, and staff reported a lower likelihood of quitting., Implications: Multiple studies report significant interpersonal stress between family members of nursing home residents and facility staff members. Partners in Caregiving appears to be an effective way to improve family-staff relationships in nursing homes.

Purpose: Although several studies have examined the magnitude and prevalence of Medicaid estate planning (MEP), little is known about factors that influence individual behaviors in this area. Normative data regarding public perceptions of and motivations for MEP are nonexistent. This study explored views about MEP among community-dwelling older adults and family caregivers., Design and Methods: Eighteen focus groups were completed (N = 155), with a stratified homogeneous sample to ensure representation from individuals of varying race/ethnicity, experience with nursing home and home care services, and socioeconomic status. Analyses of transcripts were completed with NUD*IST 4.0 software., Results: Disincentives for MEP included losing control of one's assets, Medicaid stigma, and perceived immorality of MEP. Incentives for MEP included preservation of one's estate and protection of a spouse. Finally, variability in accessibility to and awareness of MEP was described., Implications: This exploratory study identifies motivations for individual behaviors and describes evolving social norms regarding MEP; implications for policy and research are discussed.

This study was part of a multiphase project examining the perceptions of elder law attorneys, certified financial planners, and Medicaid eligibility workers regarding Medicaid estate planning (MEP) for nursing home care. Focus group methodology (5 groups, N = 32 participants) was used to explore the perspectives and experiences of Medicaid eligibility workers, who are responsible for interpreting, administering, and enforcing federal and state regulations. Findings describe factors influencing MEP, enforcement of regulations, and potential policy responses to MEP. Participants identified numerous impediments to effective implementation of current regulations. Recommendations for improved policy include redefinition of spousal assessment policies, other valuable consideration determinations, and penalty period formulas.

The next White House Conference on Aging (WHCoA) will take place in May, 1995. In preparation for the conference, a panel of expert policy researchers was convened to develop recommendations regarding the WHCoA theme and agenda. This article presents in summary form the key findings of this panel. Six major themes are proposed for the agenda. In addition, a strategy is proposed for organizing and prioritizing recommendations that emerge from the 1995 WHCoA.