Search

This study provides evidence for the multiscale nature of atmospheric rivers (ARs) by differentiating them based on high‐ (HF) and low‐frequency (LF) moisture transports. The HF‐dominant ARs exhibit migratory behavior as they are typically accompanied by extratropical cyclones. Their spatial distribution is seasonally synchronized with midlatitude storm activity. On the other hand, the LF‐dominant ARs stay in place as they are associated with quasi‐stationary circulation. They prevail in the subtropical monsoon regions in the summer hemisphere. The ARs are often jointly affected by HF and LF processes. Such intermediate ARs are frequently observed along the poleward boundary of subtropical highs. The latter two AR types are locally more persistent than the HF‐dominant ARs, implying the importance of LF dynamics in long‐lasting AR impacts. We suggest that multiscale analysis of ARs will offer valuable insights into their diversity and hydrological impacts. Plain Language Summary: Atmospheric rivers (ARs) are narrow corridors of intense water vapor transport often concurrent with extratropical cyclones. Through case studies and climatological analyses, however, this study shows that ARs are not only associated with high‐frequency (HF) moisture transport such as those driven by extratropical cyclones but also related to low‐frequency (LF) moisture transport driven by quasi‐stationary circulation. The HF‐dominant ARs are observed along the midlatitude storm tracks, while the LF‐dominant ARs appear in summer monsoon regions in low latitudes. There are also a non‐negligible number of ARs jointly influenced by HF and LF processes, particularly along the poleward flank of subtropical highs. Noticeably, ARs strongly influenced by LF processes have a longer local duration than others. It implies that LF dynamics, which have received relatively less attention, need to be incorporated for a better understanding and prediction of the long‐lasting AR impacts. This study highlights that ARs have diverse characteristics by HF and LF processes. Taking their multiscale nature into account thus will be helpful when delineating the dynamics and hydrological impacts of ARs. Key Points: High‐frequency moisture transport related to atmospheric rivers (ARs) is synchronized with transient storm activity in midlatitudesThe ARs are also fueled by low‐frequency (LF) moisture transport along the boundary of subtropical highs and in the summer monsoon regionsThe LF moisture transport plays a critical role in locally long‐duration AR events, increasing the risk of high‐rank AR events [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract This study provides evidence for the multiscale nature of atmospheric rivers (ARs) by differentiating them based on high‐ (HF) and low‐frequency (LF) moisture transports. The HF‐dominant ARs exhibit migratory behavior as they are typically accompanied by extratropical cyclones. Their spatial distribution is seasonally synchronized with midlatitude storm activity. On the other hand, the LF‐dominant ARs stay in place as they are associated with quasi‐stationary circulation. They prevail in the subtropical monsoon regions in the summer hemisphere. The ARs are often jointly affected by HF and LF processes. Such intermediate ARs are frequently observed along the poleward boundary of subtropical highs. The latter two AR types are locally more persistent than the HF‐dominant ARs, implying the importance of LF dynamics in long‐lasting AR impacts. We suggest that multiscale analysis of ARs will offer valuable insights into their diversity and hydrological impacts.

A warmer climate impacts streamflows and these changes need to be quantified to assess future risk, vulnerability, and to implement efficient adaptation measures. The climate simulations from the fifth phase of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP5), which have been the basis of most such assessments over the past decade, are being gradually superseded by the more recent Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6). Our study portrays the added value of the CMIP6 ensemble over CMIP5 in a first North America wide comparison using 3,107 catchments. Results show a reduced spread of the CMIP6 ensemble compared to the CMIP5 ensemble for temperature and precipitation projections. In terms of flow indicators, the CMIP6 driven hydrological projections result in a smaller spread of future mean and high flow values, except for mountainous areas. Overall, we assess that the CMIP6 ensemble provides a narrower band of uncertainty of future climate projections, bringing more confidence for hydrological impact studies. Plain Language Summary: Greenhouse gas emissions are causing the climate to warm significantly, which in turn impacts flows in rivers worldwide. To adapt to these changes, it is essential to quantify them and assess future risk and vulnerability. Climate models are the primary tools used to achieve this. The main data set that provides scientists with state‐of‐the‐art climate model simulations is known as the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP). The fifth phase of that project (CMIP5) has been used over the past decade in multiple hydrological studies to assess the impacts of climate change on streamflow. The more recent sixth phase (CMIP6) has started to generate projections, which brings the following question: is it necessary to update the hydrological impact studies performed using CMIP5 with the new CMIP6 models? To answer this question, a comparison between CMIP5 and CMIP6 using 3,107 catchments over North America was conducted. Results show that there is less spread in temperature and precipitation projections for CMIP6. This translates into a smaller spread of future mean, high and low flow values, except for mountainous areas. Overall, we assess that using the CMIP6 data set would provide a more concerted range of future climate projections, leading to more confident hydrological impact studies. Key Points: A comparison of hydrological impacts using Coupled Model Intercomparison Project version 5 (CMIP5) and Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) ensembles is performed over 3,107 catchments in North AmericaThe CMIP6 ensembles provide a narrower band of uncertainty for hydrological indicators in the futureIt is recommended to update hydrological impact studies performed using CMIP5 with the CMIP6 ensemble [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study focuses on quantifying future anthropogenic changes in surface runoff associated with extreme precipitation in California's Sierra Nevada. The method involves driving a land surface model with output from a high resolution regional atmospheric simulation of the most extreme atmospheric rivers (ARs). AR events were selected from an ensemble of global climate model simulations of historical and late 21st century climate under the "high‐emission" RCP8.5 scenario. Average precipitation during the future ARs increases by ~25% but a much lower proportion falls as snow. The resulting future runoff increase is dramatic—nearly 50%, reflecting both the precipitation increase and simultaneous conversion of snow to rain. The "double whammy" impact on runoff is largest in the 2,000–2,500 m elevation band, where the snowfall loss and precipitation increase are both especially large. This huge increase in runoff during the most extreme AR events could present major flood control challenges for the region. Key Points: Atmospheric river storm events will become more extreme and result in intensified surface runoff along with reduced snowfallThe "double whammy" impact on runoff is dramatic in the future—nearly 50% on average, easily double and higher in certain locationsThe disproportionately enlarged runoff during extremes could raise significant challenges for water resource management and flood control [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]