1. A Factor Two Difference in 21st‐Century Greenland Ice Sheet Surface Mass Balance Projections From Three Regional Climate Models Under a Strong Warming Scenario (SSP5‐8.5).
- Author
-
Glaude, Q., Noel, B., Olesen, M., Van den Broeke, M., van de Berg, W. J., Mottram, R., Hansen, N., Delhasse, A., Amory, C., Kittel, C., Goelzer, H., and Fettweis, X.
- Subjects
- *
GREENLAND ice , *GLOBAL warming , *ATMOSPHERIC models , *ICE sheets , *POLAR climate - Abstract
The Arctic is warming rapidly, significantly reducing the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS) surface mass balance (SMB) and raising its contribution to global sea‐level rise. Since these trends are expected to continue, it is essential to explore the GrIS SMB response to projected climate warming. We compare projections from three polar regional climate models, RACMO, MAR, and HIRHAM, forced by the Community Earth System Model CESM2 under a high‐end warming scenario (SSP5‐8.5, 1970–2099). We reveal different modeled SMB by 2100, including a twofold larger annual surface mass loss in MAR (−1735 Gt/yr) and HIRHAM (−1698 Gt/yr) relative to RACMO (−964 Gt/yr). Discrepancies primarily stem from differences in projected runoff, triggering melt‐albedo positive feedback and subsequent modeled ablation zone expansion. In addition, we find different responses of modeled meltwater production to similar atmospheric warming. Our analysis suggests clear avenues for model developments to further improve SMB projections and contribution to sea‐level rise. Plain Language Summary: We explore how three different polar climate models predict the future surface mass balance (SMB) of the Greenland ice sheet (GrIS), a major contributor to global sea‐level rise. Our results show that SMB projections among these models differ significantly by the end of the century. Differences primarily stem from how models convert meltwater into surface runoff toward the ocean, a crucial SMB component that directly contributes to sea‐level rise. Another key factor is the response of these models to climate warming, substantially affecting future melting rates. Our research highlights the need for further improvements of these climate models. By identifying and understanding the drivers behind model differences, we can improve SMB predictions and better estimate future global sea‐level rise. Key Points: With identical forcing, Greenland Ice Sheet surface mass balance from 3 regional climate models shows a two‐fold difference by 2100Different runoff projections stem from substantial discrepancies in projected ablation zone expansion, and reciprocallyThe response of meltwater production to similar atmospheric warming differs significantly among regional climate models [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF