Search

The Devonian volcanic rocks are widely distributed in the East Junggar (Xinjiang, NW China), preserving important magmatic records for investigating Palaeozoic tectonic evolution. The Beitashan Formation is mainly composed of pyroclastic rocks and sedimentary rocks in the lower section and intermediate–basic volcanic lava and pyroclastic rocks in the upper section. In this paper, we present geochronological, geochemical, and in situ Lu–Hf isotopic data for Beitashan Formation volcanic rocks from the East Junggar. Zircon U–Pb analyses from a basalt sample by laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry yielded a weighted mean age of 387.8 ± 4.5 Ma, indicating that it was generated in the Middle Devonian. The basic–intermediate volcanic rocks are tholeiitic to calc‐alkalic and are characterized by MgO (2.29–5.91 wt.%), low TiO2 (0.75–1.36 wt.%), and relatively high Al2O3 (15.82–16.73 wt.%). Furthermore, they display enrichment in light rare‐earth elements and large‐ion lithophile elements (such as Ba and Sr) and depletion in Nb, Ta, and Ti, along with slightly positive Eu anomalies (δEu = 0.83–1.15) and Ce anomalies (δCe = 1.00–1.11). In addition, in situ zircon Hf isotopic analyses from basalt samples show εHf(t) values ranging from +4.33 to +15.2, indicating a depleted mantle source with minor crustal contamination. They also show relatively low Nb/Zr (0.04–0.06), Th/Yb (0.67–3.83), and Ba/La (6.79–67.53) and high Ce/Th (7.71–18.94), Ba/Rb (21.39–294.28), and Ba/Th (31.42–486.58). The geochemical data suggest these rocks were likely derived from 10% to 30% partial melting of a garnet‐rich with minor spinel‐bearing Iherzolite depleted mantle metasomatized by slab‐derived fluids, with crustal contamination. Combined with the geological setting and previous studies, we suggest that the northern East Junggar was in a northward‐subducted island‐arc setting in the Devonian. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The tectonic setting of the Alxa Tectonic Belt (ATB) during the late Palaeozoic is highly controversial. The nature and tectonic origin of the late Palaeozoic magmatism in the ATB are key to resolving the current controversy. This paper provides field, petrographic, geochemical, and zircon U‐Pb‐Hf isotopic data for the late Palaeozoic granitoids and volcanic rocks from the south‐western ATB. The granitoids display a wide range of SiO2 contents from diorite, granodiorite, to granites, with widely distributed hydrous minerals such as hornblende and biotite. They are calc‐alkaline to high‐potassium calc‐alkaline, metaluminous with an enrichment of light rare earth elements and large‐ion lithophile elements (LILE), and a depletion of high‐field‐strength elements (HFSE). The presence of mafic‐intermediate enclaves in the plutons suggests the role of crust–mantle interaction in generating the granitoids. The volcanic rocks show "block‐in‐matrix" structures in the field. They are dacite‐porphyry and rhyolite and show calc‐alkaline characteristics with an enrichment of LILE and a depletion of HFSE. Laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry zircon U‐Pb dating shows that the granitoids and enclaves crystallized during ~317–287 Ma and the dacite porphyry formed at ~295 Ma. Hf‐in‐zircon isotopic compositions reveal predominately positive εHf (t) values and Neoproterozoic TDMC ages for the magmatic rocks, indicating mixing between mantle‐derived magma and Precambrian basement during their genesis. The diagnostic field, geochemical data, and isotopic data imply these rocks were generated in a subduction‐related active continental margin setting. The presence of A2‐type granite indicates an extensional environment resulted from slab rollback in a retreating accretionary context can best interpret the large‐scale late Carboniferous–early Permian magmatism in the ATB. Our new data, combined with published data, imply that a large active continental margin existed in the Beishan, Alxa, and the northern margin of the North China Craton, due to the south‐dipping subduction of the Palaeo‐Asian Ocean (PAO) in the late Palaeozoic. Therefore, our data suggest that the PAO did not close until after the early Permian. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Bayan Obo–Duolun–Chifeng–Kaiyuan (BDCK) Fault is considered the boundary between the North China Craton (NCC) and Central Asian Orogenic Belt (CAOB). However, the site of this boundary from Duolun to Chifeng and Kaiyuan remains highly controversial. Here, we present an integrated study of petrology, whole‐rock geochemistry, and zircon U–Pb and Sr–Nd–Hf isotope compositions for tonalites and amphibolites in the Bainaimiao arc belt (BAB) to better constrain the northern NCC margin. The tonalites are similar to NCC tonalite–trondhjemite–granodiorites (TTGs), characterized by relatively high Na2O/K2O and Sr/Y ratios and fractionated rare earth element (REE) patterns, with high light REE (LREE) but low heavy REE (HREE) concentrations. Laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry (LA–ICP–MS) zircon U–Pb dating yields formation ages of 2599–2674 Ma, with a weighted average of 2649.6 ± 3.7 Ma. The εHf(t) values (3.5–7.5), two‐stage model ages (2673–2793 Ma), whole‐rock positive εNd(t) values (1.3–1.9), and two‐stage model ages (2841–2880 Ma) suggest that the Neoarchean tonalites likely originated from remelting of thickened Meso‐Neoarchean mafic crust. LA–ICP–MS U–Pb isotope data reveal that the amphibolites formed at ~2610 Ma. They have high‐Fe tholeiitic compositions and are close to normal mid‐ocean ridge basalt (N‐MORB)‐like rocks, indicating that they were generated from partial melting of the depleted mantle. The existence of Neoarchean basement rocks, combined with seismic and isotope data, suggests that the Jiefangyingzi area is part of the Trans‐North China Orogen (TNCO) in the NCC rather than part of the CAOB and that the northern boundary of the NCC in Chifeng is located north to the Jiefangyingzi area. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Kamust sandstone‐hosted uranium deposit was recently discovered within the Middle Jurassic Toutunhe Formation of the eastern Junggar Basin. In this study, polarizing microscope and scanning electron microscope observation, electron microprobe analysis, and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry measurement were carried out to define the petrology, mineralogy, and geochemistry of these sandstone‐hosted uranium ores. In addition, sulphur isotope signatures for the associated ore‐stage pyrites and the ore‐forming age were determined. The results show that the mineralized sandstones, which exhibit excellent reducibility with abundant organic matter and pyrites, are characterized by the secondary accumulation of uranium and are slightly enriched in rare earth elements (REE) and light REE (LREE). The uranium deposits are mainly composed of a large amount of uraninite, followed by some coffinites and uranium‐bearing titanium minerals and very few sorptive uranium‐bearing materials. Uranium minerals primarily exist within the interior and edge of clastic particles in colloidal, dispersed, and vein form, and some are closely interweaved with the colloidal and framboidal pyrites and carbonaceous detritus. Both uraninite and coffinite are strongly enriched in REE and LREE, as determined by in situ trace element measurements. Moreover, the δ34S values of the associated ore‐stage pyrites mostly range from −41.66 to −19.33‰, indicating biological origin, and light 32S demonstrates the relatively low‐temperature and open‐system mineralization processes related to the microbial anaerobic action on the organic matter. One of the δ34S values (6.88‰) is possibly caused by Rayleigh isotope fractionation due to the utilization of residual heavy 34S in the relatively later closed‐like mineralization system. The ore‐reforming ages of 27 ± 3.2 Ma, 22.4 ± 3.9 Ma, and 21.3 ± 2.3 Ma were obtained by U–Pb isotopic dating combined with U–Ra balance correction, corresponding to the rapid uplift event caused by the remote effect of the collision between the Indian and Eurasian plates at the end of the Palaeogene. In conjunction with the tectonic–sedimentary evolution of the study region, a four‐stage ore‐forming model for the Middle Jurassic Toutunhe Formation is preliminarily constructed: ① Development of ore‐bearing strata, ② initiation of the mineralization stage from the Late Jurassic to the Early Cretaceous, ③ deep burial by lacustrine and flood mudstone from the Cretaceous to the Palaeogene, and ④ the superimposed ore‐forming stage during the Neogene. These research results provide significant benefits for further uranium prospecting and in situ leach process mining in this basin. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High‐K calc‐alkaline granitoids play a key role in understanding the formation and evolution of the continental crust. Herein, we present new laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry zircon U–Pb and Lu–Hf isotopic, whole‐rock geochemical and Sr–Nd isotopic data of early Jurassic high‐K calc‐alkaline granitoids in the Zhanggunagcai Range, NE China. In situ zircon U–Pb dating shows that the granodiorite‐monzogranite‐granite (GMG) suite was emplaced at ca. 192–187 Ma. They are high‐K calc‐alkaline and weakly peraluminous, similar to the geochemical characteristics of I‐type granites. The GMG suite has lower bulk‐rock initial 87Sr/86Sr ratios of 0.7037–0.7042, slightly positive εNd(t) values of +1.10 to +1.87 and highly positive zircon εHf(t) values of +5.3 to +10.9. This result suggests a major contribution of juvenile crust to the magma source. The tetrad rare earth element patterns and highly negative Eu anomalies of samples with high SiO2 contents indicate that fractional crystallization plays an important role in the genesis. Together with data in the literature, we infer that the early Jurassic granitic rocks have been formed by partial melting of juvenile arc crust associated with the westward subduction of the Paleo‐Pacific Plate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Laser ablation–inductively coupled plasma–mass spectrometry zircon U–Pb ages indicate that the Shaziling pluton in the Jiuyishan area, Ningyuan County, Hunan Province crystallised at 151.9 ± 1.1 to 154.1 ± 1.2 Ma, indicating that it was emplaced during the Late Jurassic. The Shaziling pluton is metaluminous to peraluminous (A/CNK = 0.93–1.09), and has high silica and alkali contents, low Ca and Mg contents, and K2O/Na2O and FeO*/MgO ratios of 1.37–2.65 (mean = 1.80) and 5.43–15.33 (mean = 7.14), respectively. The total rare earth element (REE) content varies from 186.75 to 413.17 ppm, and the pluton is enriched in light REEs and shows negative Eu anomalies (0.095–0.224). It is enriched in the large‐ion lithophile elements Rb and Th, and depleted in Ni, Cr, Eu, Ti, V, P, and Sr. The pluton yields Ga/Al ratios of 245–582 ppm (mean = 350 ppm) and Zr + Nb + Ce + Y contents of 256.8–630.7 ppm (mean = 441.95 ppm), similar to A‐type granites. The Shaziling pluton has a high initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio (Sri = 0.71603–0.71817), and low εNd(t) (−6.8 to −7.4) and εHf(t) (4.8 to −14.2) values. The granitic magmas were produced by partial melting of crustal material, along with a mantle contribution. The Nd and Hf model ages are 1546–1498 and 1756–1061 Ma, respectively, suggesting that the source rocks separated from the mantle reservoir during the Mesoproterozoic. The Shaziling pluton was formed in an intracontinental extensional environment related to subduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]