Search

The assessment of landslide hazards is crucial for disaster prevention and mitigation, but it has not considered the dynamic influencing factors that trigger landslides. The timeliness and practical value of the assessment results still need to be further improved. This study constructed a dynamic landslide hazard assessment system using information value model, dynamic precipitation data, and Backpropagation Neural Network (BPNN) model. Taking the Qingjiang Reservoir landslide in Changyang County, Hubei Province, China as an example, based on dynamic precipitation data and the BPNN model were used to develop a dynamic landslide hazard prediction model, and the temporal assessment and spatial distribution results of slope unit hazards in the study area from the 1980s to the 2010s, 2025, and 2030 were evaluated and predicted. It is predicted that the percentage of very high and high areas in 2025 and 2030 will be 50.5% and 57.5% respectively. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Traditional landslide susceptibility assessment methods often rely on single models, which can be biased and less accurate. In this article, we introduce a two-tiered strategy to enhance landslide susceptibility predictions. Initially, we employ an ensemble stacking technique that combines the strengths of three machine learning classifiers. This combination leverages the support vector classifier (SVC) as the key meta-classifier to optimize and refine predictions. Subsequently, we integrate the extreme gradient boosting (XGB), random forest (RF) and gradient boosting decision tree (GBDT) models with SVC to create hybrid approaches. In this study, we evaluate and compare the effectiveness of six machine learning algorithms for predicting landslide susceptibility in Anhua County, Hunan Province, China. The results demonstrated that the stacking ensemble model outperforms traditional models. The XBGþSVC model achieves the highest AUC value (0.9468), which is followed by the GBDTþSVC (0.9316), RFþSVC (0.9162), XGB (0.9393), GBDT (0.9009), and RF (0.8693). These findings indicate that stacking machine learning approaches hold promise for landslide susceptibility mapping. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The periodic storage and release of water in reservoirs have the potential to accelerate deformation or trigger ancient landslides. Interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) technology, renowned for its wide coverage and high precision, has emerged as an effective technique for the identification and monitoring of landslides. This study utilized spaceborne InSAR technology to identify and interpret landslides in the Liujiangxia reservoir area in China, leading to the detection of a total of 20 landslides. Moreover, among these 20 landslides, the landslide with substantial deformation (LJX02) was chosen, and the wavelet quantitative analysis technique was employed to investigate the correlation and time lag between various elevation positions of this landslide, the reservoir water level, and rainfall. The study successfully demonstrated that the deformation of the landslide lagged behind the reservoir water level by 152.10-182.50 days (from low to high elevation) and was delayed by 45.60-68.44 days compared to rainfall (from high to low elevation). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

After the earthquake in Wenchuan in 2008, landslides have been happening frequently, causing a buildup of sediment in slopes and gullies. This creates a potential for mudslides and flash floods. It is important to create a model to assess the likelihood of landslides in Wenchuan County for disaster prevention. This study focuses on Wenchuan County, using 6180 co-seismic landslide sites as data. The relevant survey data is combined, and slope, normalized difference vegetation Index (NDVI), peak seismic acceleration (PGA), stream power index (SPI), topographic wetness index (TWI), distance from the road, distance from the fault, distance from the water system, relief intensity, aspect, curvature, land use type, and lithologic characters are chosen. The significance of the co-seismic landslide key influence factors is discussed. The study area's disaster susceptibility was assessed using the informative hierarchical analysis method model (I-AHP) and fully connected neural network (FCNN) model; the evaluation's findings mostly agreed with the survey's actual findings. The study's findings demonstrated that: (1) the FCNN model's AUC value was 0.910, while the I-AHP model's AUC value was 0.768, and the ROC curve and AUC value analysis indicated that the FCNN model outperformed the I-AHP model. (2) The three most significant influencing factors are lithology, topographic relief, and distance from roads; they account for 29.5%, 11%, and 10% of the total, respectively. Thus, landslide hazard research should be done in the high terrain undulating areas surrounding the road, and rock monitoring should be intensified in post-earthquake landslide-prone areas like Wenchuan County. (3) Given that Yingxiu Town is the epicentre of the region and that landslide disasters are highly likely to occur there, technical support for landslide disaster prediction, forecasting, safe prevention, and control in the area needs to be strengthened. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Landslide inventory incompleteness (LII) may significantly affect the model performance in landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM). However, traditional methods, including heuristic, statistical and deterministic models, cannot address LII issue. In this work, we introduce a novel hybrid LEO-MAHP model, blending landslide frequency, empirical adjustments, optimization functions, and multi-participated analytic hierarchy process to address it by taking Badong County as the study area. This hybrid model mitigates the drawbacks of data-heavy statistical approaches and subjective heuristic models by incorporating LII into weight determination. The findings show that the LEO-MAHP model demonstrates superior performance (AUROC = 0.809 and 0.805) over conventional statistical (AUROC = 0.714 and 0.770) and heuristic models (AUROC = 0.738 and 0.741) across different LII levels. We further discuss alternative LII solutions, proposing an updated landslide management strategy that accounts for climate change and human activities. Our findings underscore the necessity of evaluating LII before applying statistical or machine learning methods in LSM. List of Abbreviations: AHP: Analytic hierarchy process; AUROC: Area under receiver operating characteristic curve; CR: Consistency ratio; CI: Consistency index; CF: Conditional factor; DEM: Digital elevation model; FN: False negative; FP: False positive; FPR: False positive rate; InSAR: Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar; IV: Information value; LD: Landslide density; LII: Landslide inventory incompleteness; LS: Landside susceptibility; LSI: Landslide susceptibility index; LSM: Landslide susceptibility mapping; MAHP: Multi-participated analytic hierarchy process; MC: Model construction; MCDA: Multi-criteria decision analysis; MV: Model verification; MPP: Model prediction performance; ORS: Optical remote sensing; P&C: Prevention and control; PGA: peak ground acceleration; ROC: Receiver operating characteristic; RI: Random index; TN: True negative; TP: True positive; TPR: True positive rate. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]