Search

Landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) research is vital for averting and mitigating regional landslide disasters. Nevertheless, there has been a lack of systematic analysis regarding LSM's developmental drivers. Utilizing SciMAT, a scientometric tool, we analyzed 1661 papers on LSM from the Web of Science core collection database, spanning 1993 to 2022. We employed cluster and thematic evolution analysis in SciMAT to unveil trends. The results indicate a consistent upward trend over the past three decades. LSM modeling methods, geological data, and contributing factors are major focal points. Notably, the evolution of LSM models, with a rising adoption of machine learning and deep learning for risk assessment, emerges as a central knowledge pathway. This study offers valuable insights to scholars by identifying literature gaps and highlighting crucial research directions, facilitating informed decision-making in the realm of LSM. SciMAT tool initially employs cluster analysis and thematic evolution analysis to pinpoint the current popular themes and evolutionary trends of landslide susceptibility. The main trajectory of knowledge lies in the progression of landslide modeling methods. The latest trend in landslide susceptibility research is centered on the use of deep learning techniques, particularly convolutional neural networks, to achieve precise risk zonation. The study aims to highlight critical research directions, predict the future of LSM technology, and provide guidance for scholars. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The coastline between Tetouan and Bou Ahmed in the northernmost Rif of Morocco and its hinterland has become immensely hazardous due to frequent triggering of diversified landslides from last two decades. This paper describes the potential application of a set of multisource data and the GIS platform for zoning and identifying anomalous areas prone to landsliding and its associated landslide hazards. For this purpose, Information value (IV), Statistical index SI (Wi), Weighting factors (WF) and Evidential belief function (EBF) models have been used in this study. Eleven conditioning factors such as elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, shaded/relief, proximity to streams, proximity to faults, proximity to roads, land use, lithology, annual rainfall and an inventory of 905 unstable spots were used to develop the spatial database for landslides susceptibility mapping (LSM). The factors have been used after a test of multi-collinearity. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) methods were used for validation of the LSM. The AUC results showed good prediction accuracy for all models with a prediction rate of 78% (IV), 77% (SI), 73% (WF) and 70% (EBF) respectively. However, the results indicated that comparatively, the IV model followed by WI model is more precise and accurate for landslides susceptibility mapping than other models. According to the presented models, about 64% of the study area is located in high to very high landslide susceptible zone. The findings presented in this study are imperatively valuable especially wherein large development projects and land use planning activities are going on. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In this paper, an original methodology for landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) is presented. It consists of bagging ensembles of artificial neural networks (ANNs) and random forests (RFs), and hybrid bagging ensembles of these models. It is applied on the area of the Itajaí-Açu river valley. In December 2020, there was an extreme rainfall in the region, which triggered landslides. The RF ensemble presented slightly higher accuracy (0.941) than the ANN ensemble (0.940), but the ANN ensemble had a more balanced relation between sensitivity (0.966) and specificity (0.915) than the RF ensemble (specificity = 0.992, sensitivity = 0.891). The mixed ANN-RF ensemble presented the higher accuracy of all (0.950), and a good balance between sensitivity (0.948) and specificity (0.951), being considered the best model within those analyzed. The hybrid ensemble, together with classification threshold adjustment, removed discrepancies on the maps between both models by attenuating them. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Susceptibility based on different landslide types has rarely been assessed. Therefore, this paper aims to compare the prediction performance of hybrid approaches by combining the logistic model tree (LMT) with Decorate, random subspace, and rotation forest ensemble techniques (De-LMT, RS-LMT, and RoF-LMT) for susceptibility assessments of different landslide types. The Yuzi River catchment along the eastern margin of the Tibetan Plateau was selected as the study area. In this catchment, 478 rockfalls and 167 landslides were identified, and further partitioned into training (70%) and validation (30%) datasets, respectively. Subsequently, 13 conditioning factors were initially considered, and then 11 and 8, respectively, were selected as the final rockfall and landslide influencing parameters to conduct susceptibility models through multicollinearity analysis and information gain. Finally, the model performances were evaluated by area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC). The obtained results demonstrated that elevation and rainfall were most influential factors for rockfall and landslide. For the rockfall prediction, the De-LMT model achieved the best prediction accuracy with the highest AUC (0.939), followed by the RS-LMT (0.938), RoF-LMT (0.928), and LMT (0.919) models. For the landslide prediction, the De-LMT model (AUC = 0.931) outperformed and outclassed the RoF-LMT (0.926), RS-LMT (0.922), and LMT (0.915) models. Therefore, it is reasoned out that all models exhibited satisfactory performance (AUC > 0.9), and the De-LMT model was superior in rockfall and landslide spatial prediction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Landslide susceptibility assessment (LSA) is a significant part of landslide research, which plays an important role in preventing landslide disasters. It has gained an increasing attention in both the academic and practice fields for the past two decades. However, there have been few bibliometric analyses on this topic, although bibliometric analysis can inspire future researchers by exploring the overall characteristics of the published literature. This article aims at collecting and analyzing the information of the abstracts, authors, institutions, countries, journals, funds, and keywords of the recent 4,732 papers published from 1999 to 2021 in Web of Science (www.webofscience.com). In particular, latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA), a machine learning and text analysis method, is utilized to analyze the abstract of each article to identify the hottest research topics related to LSA. The results revealed that: (1) The amount of annual publications related to LSA generally shows an increasing trend, which accounts for about 22% of the total landslide publications in 2021; (2) The author of Pradhan B, the institution of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, the country of China, the journal of Natural Hazards and the funding agency of the National Natural Science Foundation of China, are the productive performers in each aspect of LSA; and (3) Machine learning methods have gained a rapid increase in LSA in recent five years, which have become the most popular research topic. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Landslide susceptibility assessment is used to predict the occurrence probability of landslides, and the results can provide a scientific basis for preventing and reducing landslides. Traditional assessment models usually assume that the contribution degree of landslide influence factors is fixed throughout an entire study area. Therefore, the results can only compare the relative weights of the different influencing factors, thereby ignoring changes in their contributions in the study area. This paper introduces a geographically weighted logistic regression (GWLR) model to assess the susceptibility of study area to landslides, fully considers the spatial heterogeneity of the influencing factors, and further explores the spatial relationships between the influencing factors and landslide occurrence. Based on landslide data from Zhenxiong County, Yunnan Province, China, collected in 2015, we selected 10 influencing factors covering the five aspects of topographies and geomorphologies, geological structures, meteorological conditions, ecological environments and human activities and implemented multicollinearity and significance tests to obtain the most suitable factors required by the model. Then, the GWLR model was used to analyze the degrees of landslide susceptibility across Zhenxiong County. The results show that the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) of the GWLR model was 0.904, which suggests that the model had a high prediction accuracy. In addition, the regression coefficient maps of the influencing factors based on the GWLR model reflected changes in the relative contributions of each influencing factor in the study area, providing a reference for managers to formulate targeted decision-making measures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The concept of leveraging the predictive capacity of predisposing factors for landslide susceptibility (LS) modeling has been continuously improved in recent work focusing on computational and machine learning algorithms. This paper explores the predictive capacity of different approaches to LS modelling using artificial intelligence. The key objective of this study is to estimate a LS map for the Taleghan-Alamut basin of Iran using Credal Decision Tree (CDT)-based (i.e. CDT-Bagging, CDT-Multiboost and CDT-SubSpace) hybrid machine learning approaches, which are state-of-the-art soft computing approaches that are hardly ever utilized in the assessment of LS. In this study, we used eighteen landslide predisposing factors (LPFs) that we considered to be the most important local morphological and geo-environmental factors influencing the occurrence of landslides. We calculated the significance of each of the LPFs in the landslide susceptibility assessment using the Random Forest Method. We also employed the Receiver Operating Characteristic curve, precision, performance, map robustness measurement and selection of the best-fitting models. The results shows that, compared to the other models, the CDT-Multiboost is the excellent model in this perspective with an average area under curve (AUC) of 0.993 based on a 4-fold cross-validation. We, therefore, consider the CDT-Multiboost models to be an effective method for improving spatial prediction of LS where landslide scarps or bodies are not clearly identified during the preparation of landslide inventory maps. Therefore, it will be helpful for preparing future landslide inventory maps and mitigate landslide damages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]