Search

The coastline between Tetouan and Bou Ahmed in the northernmost Rif of Morocco and its hinterland has become immensely hazardous due to frequent triggering of diversified landslides from last two decades. This paper describes the potential application of a set of multisource data and the GIS platform for zoning and identifying anomalous areas prone to landsliding and its associated landslide hazards. For this purpose, Information value (IV), Statistical index SI (Wi), Weighting factors (WF) and Evidential belief function (EBF) models have been used in this study. Eleven conditioning factors such as elevation, slope, aspect, curvature, shaded/relief, proximity to streams, proximity to faults, proximity to roads, land use, lithology, annual rainfall and an inventory of 905 unstable spots were used to develop the spatial database for landslides susceptibility mapping (LSM). The factors have been used after a test of multi-collinearity. The Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve and the Area Under the Curve (AUC) methods were used for validation of the LSM. The AUC results showed good prediction accuracy for all models with a prediction rate of 78% (IV), 77% (SI), 73% (WF) and 70% (EBF) respectively. However, the results indicated that comparatively, the IV model followed by WI model is more precise and accurate for landslides susceptibility mapping than other models. According to the presented models, about 64% of the study area is located in high to very high landslide susceptible zone. The findings presented in this study are imperatively valuable especially wherein large development projects and land use planning activities are going on. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The geomorphological control on landslides susceptibility maps (LSM) and frequency-area distributions (FAD) is under-investigated. Therefore, we investigate LSMs and FAD distributions in two contrasted landscapes of Taounate province using explanatory statistical techniques. In the geologically heterogenous context, our findings show that LSM spatial distributions for deep landslides are different to those of shallow processes, regardless of the LSM technique used. The Predictive factors also differ between both types of mass movements in this rugged and heterogenous zone. However, the opposite is observed in the geologically homogenous South, where shallow and deep landslides seem to be controlled by the same factors and tend to produce LSMs that are similarly distributed. This is further emphasized by the Area Under Curve (AUC) results which yield good to very good values in the South regardless of the types of landslides used for validation, with average to bad values in the North when shallow landslides are used to validate deep LSMs and vice versa. The same can be said about FADs, which are also sensitive to landscape variations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]