Search

Transformer2 proteins (Tra2α and Tra2β) control splicing patterns in human cells, and no human phenotypes have been associated with germline variants in these genes. The aim of this work was to associate germline variants in the TRA2B gene to a novel neurodevelopmental disorder.Twelve individuals from 11 unrelated families who had predicted loss-of-function monoallelic variants, mostly de novo, were recruited. RNA-seq and Western blot analyses of Tra2β-1 and Tra2β-3 isoforms from patient-derived cells were performed. Tra2β1-GFP, Tra2β3-GFP and CHEK1 exon 3 plasmids were transfected into HEK-293 cells.All variants clustered in the 5' part of TRA2B, upstream of an alternative translation start site responsible for the expression of non-canonical Tra2β-3 isoform. All of affected individuals presented intellectual disability and/or developmental delay, frequently associated with infantile spasms, microcephaly, brain anomalies, autism spectrum disorder, feeding difficulties, and short stature. Experimental studies showed that these variants decreased the expression of the canonical Tra2β-1 isoform, while they increased the expression of the Tra2β-3 isoform, which is shorter and lacks the N-terminal RS1 domain. Increased expression of Tra2β-3-GFP were shown to interfere with the incorporation of CHEK1 exon 3 into its mature transcript, normally incorporated by Tra2β-1.Predicted loss-of-function variants clustered in the 5' portion of TRA2B cause a new neurodevelopmental syndrome through an apparently dominant negative disease mechanism involving the use of an alternative translation start site and the overexpression of a shorter, repressive Tra2β protein.

To investigate the effectiveness of phenotype-based search approaches using publicly available online databases.We included consecutively solved cases from our exome database. For each case, the combination of Human Phenotype Ontology terms reported by the referring clinician was used to perform a search in three commonly used databases: OMIM (first 300 results), Phenolyzer (first 300 results), and Mendelian (all 100 results).One hundred cases were included (43 females; mean age: 10 years). The actual molecular diagnosis identified through exome sequencing was not included in the search results of any of the queried databases in 33% of cases. In 85% of cases it was not found within the top five search results. When included, its median rank was 61 (range: 1-295), 21 (1-270), and 29 (1-92) in OMIM, Phenolyzer and Mendelian, respectively.This study demonstrates that, in most cases, phenotype-based search approaches using public online databases is ineffective in providing a probable diagnosis for Mendelian conditions. Genotype-first approach through molecular-guided diagnostics with backward phenotyping may be a more appropriate approach for these disorders, unless a specific diagnosis is considered a priori based on highly unique phenotypic features or a specific facial gestalt.

Clinical data provided to genetic testing laboratories are frequently scarce. Our purpose was to evaluate clinical scenarios where phenotypic refinement in proband's family members might impact exome data interpretation.Of 614 exomes, 209 were diagnostic and included in this study. Phenotypic information was gathered by the variant interpretation team from genetic counseling letters and images. If a discrepancy between reported clinical findings and presumably disease-causing variant segregation was observed, referring clinicians were contacted for phenotypic clarification.In 16/209 (7.7%) cases, phenotypic refinement was important due to (1) lack of cosegregation of disease-causing variant with the reported phenotype; (2) identification of different disorders with overlapping symptoms in the same family; (3) similar features in proband and family members, but molecular cause identified in proband only; and (4) previously unrecognized maternal condition causative of child's phenotype. As a result of phenotypic clarification, in 12/16 (75%) cases definition of affected versus unaffected status in one of the family members has changed, and in one case variant classification has changed.Detailed description of phenotypes in family members including differences in clinical presentations, even if subtle, are important in exome interpretation and should be communicated to the variant interpretation team.