Search

Studying gene-environment (G × E) interactions is important, as they extend our knowledge of the genetic architecture of complex traits and may help to identify novel variants not detected via analysis of main effects alone. The main statistical framework for studying G × E interactions uses a single regression model that includes both the genetic main and G × E interaction effects (the "joint" framework). The alternative "stratified" framework combines results from genetic main-effect analyses carried out separately within the exposed and unexposed groups. Although there have been several investigations using theory and simulation, an empirical comparison of the two frameworks is lacking. Here, we compare the two frameworks using results from genome-wide association studies of systolic blood pressure for 3.2 million low frequency and 6.5 million common variants across 20 cohorts of European ancestry, comprising 79,731 individuals. Our cohorts have sample sizes ranging from 456 to 22,983 and include both family-based and population-based samples. In cohort-specific analyses, the two frameworks provided similar inference for population-based cohorts. The agreement was reduced for family-based cohorts. In meta-analyses, agreement between the two frameworks was less than that observed in cohort-specific analyses, despite the increased sample size. In meta-analyses, agreement depended on (1) the minor allele frequency, (2) inclusion of family-based cohorts in meta-analysis, and (3) filtering scheme. The stratified framework appears to approximate the joint framework well only for common variants in population-based cohorts. We conclude that the joint framework is the preferred approach and should be used to control false positives when dealing with low-frequency variants and/or family-based cohorts., (© 2016 WILEY PERIODICALS, INC.) more...

Recent meta-analyses of European ancestry subjects show strong evidence for association between smoking quantity and multiple genetic variants on chromosome 15q25. This meta-analysis extends the examination of association between distinct genes in the CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 region and smoking quantity to Asian and African American populations to confirm and refine specific reported associations. Association results for a dichotomized cigarettes smoked per day phenotype in 27 datasets (European ancestry (N = 14,786), Asian (N = 6,889), and African American (N = 10,912) for a total of 32,587 smokers) were meta-analyzed by population and results were compared across all three populations. We demonstrate association between smoking quantity and markers in the chromosome 15q25 region across all three populations, and narrow the region of association. Of the variants tested, only rs16969968 is associated with smoking (P < 0.01) in each of these three populations (odds ratio [OR] = 1.33, 95% CI = 1.25-1.42, P = 1.1 × 10(-17) in meta-analysis across all population samples). Additional variants displayed a consistent signal in both European ancestry and Asian datasets, but not in African Americans. The observed consistent association of rs16969968 with heavy smoking across multiple populations, combined with its known biological significance, suggests rs16969968 is most likely a functional variant that alters risk for heavy smoking. We interpret additional association results that differ across populations as providing evidence for additional functional variants, but we are unable to further localize the source of this association. Using the cross-population study paradigm provides valuable insights to narrow regions of interest and inform future biological experiments., (© 2012 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.) more...

A general-purpose modeling framework for performing path and segregation analysis jointly, called SEGPATH (Province and Rao [1995] Stat. Med. 7:185-198), has been extended to cover "model-free" robust, variance-components linkage analysis, based on identity-by-descent (IBD) sharing. These extended models can be used to analyze linkage to a single marker or to perform multipoint linkage analysis, with a single phenotype or multivariate vector of phenotypes, in pedigrees. Within a single, consistent approach, SEGPATH models can perform segregation analysis, path analysis, linkage analysis, or combinations thereof. SEGPATH models can incorporate environmental or other measured covariate fixed effects (including measured genotypes), genotype-specific covariate effects, population heterogeneity models, repeated-measures models, longitudinal models, autoregressive models, developmental models, gene-by-environment interaction models, etc., with or without linkage components. The data analyzed can have any missing value structure (assumed missing at random), with entire individuals missing, or missing on one or more measurements. Corrections for ascertainment can be made on a vector of phenotypes and/or other measures. Because of the flexibility of the class of models, the SEGPATH approach can also be used in nongenetic applications where there is a hierarchical structure, such as longitudinal, repeated-measures, time series, or nested models. A variety of specific models are provided, as well as some comparisons with other linkage analysis models. Particular applications demonstrate the importance of correctly accounting for the extraneous sources of familial resemblance, as can be done easily with these SEGPATH models, so as to give added power to detect linkage as well as to protect against spuriously inferring linkage., (Copyright 2003 Wiley-Liss, Inc.) more...