Search

Bichirs are a sister group to sarcopterygian and tetrapods that can fully regenerate their endochondral-skeleton-fins. Histological and transcriptomic comparison approaches have been used to investigate the morphology and genetic basis of bichir lobe-fin regeneration, with strong down-regulation of muscle-related genes and up-regulation of ECM-related genes and developmental genes being observed. Bichir limb regeneration involves similar cellular processes to those employed by lungfish and salamander, with MARCKS-like protein (MLP) that is known to be a putative regeneration-initiating molecule in salamander, also up-regulated in the early stages of bichir lobe-fin regeneration. These gene expression results suggest that limb regeneration pathways in these amphibians have a common ancestral inheritance, consistent with evolution from endochondral-skeleton-fin structures to endochondral-skeleton-limb structures of vertebrates.

The phylogenetic position of Polypteriforme (bichirs) remains elusive, despite extensive research both on morphological and molecular datasets. Unfortunately morphological cladistic analyses and molecular phylogenetic analyses had reached conflicting conclusions, as Polypteriformes were either grouped with lobe-finned fishes (Sarcopterygii) or ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii), or even classified as their own group, the Brachiopterygii. In this study, we applied a third independent source of datasets, the presence versus absence of microRNAs, to re-investigate the phylogenetic relationship of bichirs. Through deep sequencing of small RNA library, we showed that bichirs should be grouped into ray-finned fishes rather than lobe-finned fishes. Phylogenetic analysis confirmed that bichirs were placed as the most basal member of the ray-finned fishes. Bichirs shared five unique microRNA families with teleostei, which were not found in any other species investigated to date. Bichirs have also retained three of five microRNAs that were previously deemed to be lost exclusively in teleostei. Furthermore, we report more than one hundred novel microRNAs that are unique to bichir. The identification of microRNAs in bichir provides overwhelming evidence for their affinity of ray-finned fishes. The sarcopterygian-like characteristics such as lobed fins, paired ventral lungs, and external gills in juveniles should not be considered as derived traits shared with those of sarcopterygians.

Extensive evidence exists for a genome duplication in the fish lineage leading to the species-rich clade of the teleosts, comprising99% of the known actinopterygian (ray-finned) fish species. Our previous studies of the neuropeptide Y receptor (NPYR) gene family suggested an ancestral gnathostome repertoire of 7 genes in 3 subfamilies. However, studies in the zebrafish have earlier identified only 5 NPYR genes, despite the expected increase in gene number due to the teleost tetraploidization. Notably, receptors Y(1), Y(5) and Y(6) were missing in the zebrafish genome database and only Y(8) had been duplicated. We report here an investigation of the evolutionary history of the Y(1) subfamily (Y(1), Y(4), Y(6) and Y(8)) and the Y(5) receptor. Seven basal actinopterygian species and a shark were investigated and a total of 22 gene fragments were cloned and analyzed. Our results show that subtypes Y(1), Y(5) and Y(6) still exist in species representing basal actinopterygian lineages (bichir, sturgeon, gar and bowfin) as well as in some basal teleost lineages. Surprisingly we identified a zebrafish Y(1) receptor, the first Y(1) receptor found in euteleosts. Thus, these findings confirm the ancestral gnathostome repertoire of 7 NPYR genes and show that many of these receptors are present in basal actinopterygians as well as some basal teleosts. NPYR losses seem to have occurred relatively recently in euteleosts because Y(1), Y(5) and Y(6) are absent in the genome databases of two pufferfishes as well as medaka and stickleback and Y(5) and Y(6) are absent in the zebrafish database. A duplicate of Y(8) seems to be the only remaining receptor gene resulting from the teleost tetraploidization. The unexpected absence of the two appetite-stimulating receptors Y(1) and Y(5) in some euteleosts, along with our discovery of duplicates of the peptide ligands NPY and PYY, has implications for the role of the NPY system in euteleost feeding behavior.