1. Society Guidelines-Where Is the Consensus?
- Author
-
Quin Y. Liu, Karl Kwok, and David S. Vitale
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Consensus ,Guidelines as Topic ,law.invention ,Food and drug administration ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,law ,Medicine ,Humans ,Duodenoscopes ,Intensive care medicine ,Duodenoscopy ,Societies, Medical ,Cholangiopancreatography, Endoscopic Retrograde ,Cross Infection ,Infection Control ,business.industry ,United States Food and Drug Administration ,Gastroenterology ,Guideline ,Disease control ,United States ,Transmission (mechanics) ,030220 oncology & carcinogenesis ,030211 gastroenterology & hepatology ,Professional association ,Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, U.S ,business - Abstract
With reports of ongoing duodenoscope contamination and pathogen transmission despite strict adherence to manufacturer reprocessing instructions, professional societies continue to release updated recommendations. Despite general guideline similarities, there are differences. Although adherence to guidelines does not entirely eliminate pathogen contamination or transmission, it is critical to strictly adhere to updated guidelines for maximum risk reduction. In the United States, the Food and Drug Administration and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention continue to offer updates regarding improved duodenoscope reprocessing techniques and endoscope design. This article critically analyzes currently available national and international duodenoscope reprocessing guidelines.
- Published
- 2020