Search

Background and Aims: The endoscopic management of malignant hilar biliary obstruction (MHBO) remains extremely challenging without universal consensus. For the first time, we compared 4 major modalities aiming to determine the optimal strategy., Methods: We reviewed 1239 patients with advanced MHBO who underwent endoscopic stent placement as the primary treatment in 4 tertiary centers. Among them, 633 eligible patients were identified and classified into 4 groups: bilateral metal stent placement (BMS), unilateral metal stent placement (UMS), bilateral plastic stent placement (BPS), and unilateral plastic stent placement (UPS). The outcomes were compared before and after propensity score matching (PSM)., Results: After PSM, 87, 97, 91, and 81 patients in the BMS, UMS, BPS, and UPS groups, respectively, were matched. The clinical success rates were 98.9%, 83.5%, 71.4%, and 65.4% in the BMS, UMS, BPS, and UPS groups (P < .001), respectively. The postprocedural cholangitis rates were 8.0%, 17.5%, 26.4%, and 29.6% (P = .002), respectively. The median symptom-free stent patency was 9.6, 6.8, 4.6, and 4.2 months (P < .001), respectively. The mean number of interventions required was 1.2 ± 0.5, 1.7 ± 0.8, 2.0 ± 1.4, and 1.9 ± 1.3 (P < .001), respectively. The median (95% confidence interval) overall survival (OS) was 7.1 (6.0-8.2), 4.4 (3.8-4.9), 4.1 (2.9-5.2), and 2.7 (1.8-3.7) months (P = .001), respectively. Compared with plastic stent placement, metal stent placement achieved higher success in all outcome parameters (P ≤ .001). Bilateral stent placement was superior to unilateral stent placement in terms of clinical success (P = .024), stent patency (P = .018), and OS (P = .040)., Conclusions: If technically possible, dual metal stent placement is a preferred palliation for inoperable MHBO, and unilateral metal stent placement is the second option., (Copyright © 2020 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Temporary plastic stent insertion has been considered a safe and effective bridge therapy for difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones. Infusing chemicals to directly dissolve stones through the bile duct might also be effective. However, there are no studies on the efficacy of the combination of these 2 approaches., Objective: To investigate the efficacy of a novel ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) and sodium cholate-eluting plastic stent on biliary stones., Design: Ex vivo model by using different doses of active ingredient., Setting and Interventions: An ex vivo bile duct model perfused with porcine bile was created. Stents coated with degradable membranes containing various concentrations of EDTA and sodium cholate were placed in the model with CBD stones., Main Outcome Measurements: The change in the weight of stents and stones was measured every week during perfusion until the coated membranes were completely biodegraded., Results: The time that the stents required to be fully degraded and the efficiency of stone dissolution were positively correlated with the percentage of EDTA and sodium cholate in the stent membrane. However, the 50% EDTA and sodium cholate stents achieved the greatest percentage of stone weight loss when the drugs were completely released., Limitations: Ex vivo study., Conclusions: The EDTA and sodium cholate-eluting plastic stent effectively dissolved CBD stones and has prospect in the therapy for patients with difficult CBD stones., (Copyright © 2014 American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.)