Search

Endoscopic biopsy forceps vary in size and design. The purpose of this prospective randomized study was to compare the quality and quantity of gastric tissue obtained by needle and non-needle versions of standard biopsy forceps and newly designed large capacity forceps. Fifty consecutive patients who underwent endoscopy with gastric biopsy forceps were enrolled in the study. There was no significant difference in the presence of crush artifact between the two forceps, both with and without the presence of a needle. Both needle and non-needle versions of the large capacity biopsy forceps were found to obtain significantly larger sized specimens (p = 0.02) than needle and non-needle versions of the standard biopsy forceps. Overall, there was no significant difference in the depth of specimen obtained when comparing the large capacity forceps to standard forceps. Needle versions of each forceps were found to obtain significantly deeper biopsies than non-needle versions of each forceps. In conclusion, our study found that large capacity forceps obtained larger specimens than standard biopsy forceps. Further clinical trials with a larger study population need to be undertaken to determine the impact of these findings on the determination of diagnoses.

The initial treatment of choice in patients with achalasia is balloon dilation. Heretofore, this procedure was performed on an in-hospital basis resulting in high patient cost. This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of pneumatic dilation as an outpatient procedure. Sixty-one procedures were performed on 50 patients at two centers. An overall treatment success rate of 95% (47 of 50 patients) was achieved. Two patients had elective surgical treatment and a third underwent surgery for perforation secondary to dilation. A total of three patients complained of post-procedure chest pain within 4 hours and were hospitalized. Two had perforations; one required surgical repair. The third patient had resolution of symptoms. We conclude that performing balloon dilation as an outpatient procedure is safe, efficacious, and cost effective.

The respiratory effect of diagnostic colonoscopy and upper endoscopy were studied in 32 elderly patients. Twenty-two underwent colonoscopy and 10 upper endoscopy. In the group undergoing upper endoscopy, 4 of 10 patients experienced a decrease in oxygen desaturation greater than or equal to 4% during the medication period; an additional 2 patients desaturated during the procedure. In the group undergoing colonoscopy, 12 of 22 patients experienced oxygen desaturation during the medication period; 3 other patients desaturated during the procedure. Mean SaO2 for each group was lowest (p less than 0.05) during the medication period. Central apneas occurred in 13 of the patients undergoing colonoscopy during the medication period; however, only 8 of these patients with apneas experienced desaturation greater than or equal to 4% and the periods of desaturation did not correlate with the periods of apneas. Oxygen desaturation greater than or equal to 4% occurs frequently during both upper endoscopy and colonoscopy in this elderly population. This is related to the effects of sedation; the procedure itself worsened the desaturation in only 16% of the patients. Furthermore, the desaturation did not correlate with changes in the breathing patterns of the patients. Low-flow oxygen and/or close monitoring of patients during and subsequent to administration of medication is advised.