Search

In a double-blind, parallel-group clinical trial of 195 patients with duodenal ulcers who after a short-term study had relief of pain and healed ulcers proved endoscopically, 65 were randomized to receive 20 mg omeprazole 3 days a week (once in the morning from Friday to Sunday), 64 to receive 10 mg omeprazole once daily in the morning, and 66 to receive placebo for up to 6 months. The patients underwent repeat endoscopy with biopsy of the gastric fundic mucosa (qualitative assessment of argyrophilic cell population), assessment of symptoms, and laboratory screening with measurement of basal serum gastrin concentrations at 3 and 6 months or more often if indicated by recurrence of symptoms. At 3 months, endoscopically proved ulcer relapse occurred in 16% receiving 20 mg omeprazole 3 days a week; 21% receiving 10 mg omeprazole daily; and 50% receiving placebo. At 6 months, corresponding rates were 23%, 27%, and 67% with 95% confidence intervals of difference between the placebo group and omeprazole groups of 28%-60% and 24%-56% (P less than 0.00001), respectively, and between omeprazole groups of -19%-11% (NS). No major clinical or laboratory side effects were noted. Thus both omeprazole regimens are effective and safe in preventing duodenal ulcer relapse.

To compare the local release of arachidonic acid metabolites in inflammatory diarrheal disease, in vivo equilibrium dialysis of the rectum was done in consecutive untreated patients with ulcerative colitis (n = 20), Crohn's colitis (n = 10), and Clostridium difficile colitis (n = 7). All patients had endoscopically proven rectal inflammation. Eicosanoid profiles were determined in rectal dialysates by radioimmunoassay after preliminary purification. Concentrations of prostaglandin E2, prostaglandin F2 alpha, and thromboxane B2, but not 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha, were raised in all groups and compared with healthy controls. The highest levels within each group were obtained in patients with widespread epithelial damage, as judged by endoscopy. In patients with ulcerative colitis, an extreme rise in prostaglandin E2 and thromboxane B2 were observed. Similarly, concentrations of leukotriene B4 were substantially increased in ulcerative colitis, but in Crohn's colitis and Clostridium difficile colitis only those patients with rectal ulcerations showed elevations. These findings probably reflect more severe tissue damages in ulcerative colitis, but differences between disease groups in cell-to-cell interaction may also contribute. The data suggest, therefore, that therapeutic inhibition of lipoxygenase pathways may prove more effective in ulcerative colitis than in Crohn's disease.

To determine the influence of inflammation and topical treatment with 5-aminosalicylic acid or prednisolone on arachidonic acid metabolism in vivo, we carried out a double-blind controlled study on the release of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 to the rectal lumen in 24 consecutive patients with proven distally located ulcerative colitis. Before and at days 15 and 29 a dialysis bag was placed in the emptied rectum for 4 h prior to assessing clinical, endoscopic, and histologic disease activity. A single enema was given daily at bedtime (1 g 5-aminosalicylic acid or 25 mg prednisolone) until complete remission or for a maximum of 4 wk. Clinical and endoscopic remission was obtained in 16 (7 on 5-aminosalicylic acid) and 11 (3 on 5-aminosalicylic acid) patients, respectively. Luminal concentrations of prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 were positively correlated to disease activity and significantly decreased among the prednisolone-treated patients. In both treatment groups a decrease toward normal levels occurred in patients responding to therapy. In retrospect, the pretreatment prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels were significantly higher in patients not responding to therapy than in those improving during treatment. In conclusion, luminal prostaglandin E2 and leukotriene B4 levels may prove more useful predictors of the outcome of treatment in relapsing ulcerative colitis than clinical indices of disease activity.