Search

We report a case of 70-year-old man who was admitted to our hospital due to hematemesis in June 2004. He was diagnosed by gastroscopy as having a type III moderately-poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma. A computed tomography (CT) scan revealed multiple lymph nodes swelling (#13, #16), finally he was diagnosed with gastric cancer stage IV (cT3, cN3, cM1). He was treated with S-1, but lymph nodes swelling increased in size, and then in March 2005, the treatment was changed to a second-line chemotherapy consisting of CPT-11 and CDDP. Abdominal CT scan showed a remarkable reduction of #16b1 lymph node, and the second-line chemotherapy was continued until 23 courses. But in April 2007, gastroscopy revealed the enlargement of gastric lesion. He was treated by third-line chemotherapy consisting of paclitaxel and doxifluoridine. This therapy was effective and continued until 7 courses. However, the treatment gradually became resistant and he died in May 2008, which was 4 years since the initial diagnosis.

A 78-year old man underwent low anterior resection for Stage IIIb rectal cancer(Ra). After surgery, he underwent the Roswell Park Memorial Institute(RPMI)regimen for 6 months followed by oral UFT for 8 months. Since liver metastasis(S6)recurred 2 years and 2 months after surgery, he underwent S6 subsegmentectomy. Four years and 4 months later, he developed multiple lymph node metastases(the Virchow, paraaortic, and intrapelvic lymph nodes), for which FOLFIRI therapy was started, but converted to the RPMI regimen because of strong gastrointestinal side effects. After 3 courses of this regimen, tumor markers returned to normal, and imaging studies showed that the metastases had disappeared. This was interpreted as a complete response(CR). The patient has maintained the complete response for 1 year and 4 months since the start of the RPMI regimen.

The purpose of the present multi-center collaborative study was to elucidate the efficacy of intraportal chemotherapy with the combination of 5-FU and MMC for the prevention of liver recurrence after resection for colorectal cancer. A total of 125 patients with Stage II, III, and IV colorectal cancer were enrolled in this study between June 1993 and December 1995. Of them, 45 patients were randomized to a portal group: 10 mg/body of mitomycin one shot portal infusion, before and after 500 mg/m2 of 5-FU per 24 h for 7 days portal infusion followed by administration of oral 5-FU. Fifty-three patients were randomized to a control group: oral administration of 5-FU. Twelve patients suffered from temporary mild liver damage. One patient (2%) in the portal group and 6 patients (11%) in the control group developed liver metastases; there was not a significant difference between these two groups regarding development of liver metastases. There was also no significant difference by tumor stage between the portal and control groups regarding development of liver metastases. The 5-year survival rate and 5-year disease-free survival were 84.3% and 81.9%, respectively, in the portal group, and 70.7% and 72.4%, respectively, in the control group; the difference was not significant. Although there was not a significant difference between the portal and control groups regarding the prognosis in stage II, there was a significant difference between the portal and control groups regarding the 5-year disease free survival in stage III (81.1% vs 54.2%). These results suggest that intraportal chemotherapy is effective for stage III colorectal cancer.

These studies were designed to evaluate the efficacy, toxicity, and resulting quality of life (QOL) of outpatient chemotherapy with infusional 5-FU for advanced gastrointestinal cancer. Schedule, sch. A: Treatment consisted of CI 5-FU 200 mg/m2/day, days 1-28, IVB Leucovorin 20 mg/m2 q week. Fifteen patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer were treated to maintain the efficacy of prior inpatient chemotherapy. Twenty-one patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy were added to evaluate toxicity and QOL. The mean time to progression (TTP) was 2.6 months. Grade 2 toxicities were seen, including mucositis (23%) and diarrhea (7%). Hand-foot syndrome was seen 60% of patients. The mean QOL score was 89.5 +/- 7.8. Sch.B: Treatment consisted of weekly 24 h infusion of 5-FU 2,600 mg/m2. 5-FU was administered using a Groshong catheter and Baxter infusor LV5 (5 ml/hr). Nine patients with advanced gastrointestinal cancer were treated. Twenty-one patients were treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. The mean TTP was 3.6 month. Grade 2 toxicities were seen, including leucocytopenia (7%), mucositis (3%), diarrhea (10%), and nausea and vomiting (10%). The mean QOL score was 82.6 +/- 10.7. In conclusion, both 5-FU schedules are feasible for outpatient chemotherapy for advanced gastrointestinal cancer.

A case of far advanced gastric cancer with multiple liver metastasis (H3) was treated with transarterial intermittent chemotherapy (5-FU: 250 mg/week, Farmorubicin: 10 mg/4 weeks, MMC: 4 mg/2 weeks) and intradermal administration of low molecular lipopolysaccharide (LPSp) extracted from Pantoea agglomerans. The CT examination and endoscopy showed regression of the tumor and the patient was discharged from the hospital. LPSp was given at the concentration of 0.1 microgram initially, and the dose was gradually increased. Finally, the dose of LPSp was increased up to 70 micrograms. No serious side effect except fever was observed. The serum TNF-alpha levels were elevated and, histologically, CD 8(+) lymphocyte dominantly infiltrated around the tumor. These findings clearly indicated the immunological anticancer effect of LPSp. Intradermal administration of LPSp is a promising new adjuvant therapy to improve QOL without serious side effect.

The aim of this study was to measure the tissue concentration of anti-cancer agents administered by arterial infusion. After the abdominal cavity was opened, 250 mg of 5-FU diluted in 20 ml saline was infused into the feeding artery in 16 patients with colonic cancer. After the affected lesion was resected, specimens were obtained at the tumor, at sites 5 and 10 cm from the center of the tumor, and at the adjacent nodes. The concentration of 5-FU was higher in the tumor and the adjacent lymph nodes than in the normal colon near the lesion. This suggests that 5-FU has a more favorable distribution profile in tumor tissue than in normal tissue. Patients with a high concentration of 5-FU in the tumor also demonstrated high levels in the other tissue. Blood flow volume and the length of time between the injection of 5-FU and harvest of the specimen may account for differences in the tissue concentration of the agent after administration of the same dose.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TAE) and hepatic arterial infusion using totally implantable reservoir were performed for the treatment of liver metastasis of colo-rectal cancers, and their therapeutic effects, side effects and complications were evaluated. Eleven cases of H1 (metastasis in one lobe only), 7 cases of H2 (a few scattered metastases in both lobes), 12 cases of H3 (numerous metastases in both lobes) were entered into the study and underwent TAE 45 times. Gel foam, Ivaron and Lipiodol were used as embolic materials in combination with chemotherapeutic agents such as mitomycin C and adriamycin. Serum CEA level was decreased less than 50% of pre-TAE level 20 out of 32 (61%). The tumor size was regressed in 25% of TAE cases which were evaluated on the basis of CT scan. Abdominal symptoms including abdominal pain, nausea and vomiting and fever, leukocytosis, elevated GOT, LDH and bilirubin level were seen after TAE therapy. Median survival of H1, H2 and H3 cases were 21 months, 8 months and 4.5 months, respectively. Another 21 cases (H1, 5 cases: H2, 3 cases: H3, 13 cases) of liver metastasis of colo-rectal cancers were treated with selective hepatic arterial infusion therapy using totally implantable reservoir. Reservoir catheters were implanted into hepatic artery via gastroduodenal artery under direct vision at laparotomy. Mitomycin C, adriamycin and fluorouracil (5-FU) were used as chemotherapeutic agents. No particular side effect such as leukopenia or liver dysfunction was noted. Median survival of H1, H2 and H3 cases treated with arterial infusion were 4 months, 9 months and 9 months, respectively. Median survival of TAE cases and arterial infusion cases was 10 and 6 months, respectively. Thus, the survival rate of cases treated with TAE was better than that of cases treated with arterial infusion.