1. Prior selfing can mitigate the negative effects of mutual reproductive interference between coexisting congeners
- Author
-
Atushi Ushimaru and Koki R. Katsuhara
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Reproductive success ,Pollination ,Niche differentiation ,food and beverages ,Zoology ,Selfing ,Interspecific competition ,Biology ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,Intraspecific competition ,Sympatric speciation ,Pollinator ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,010606 plant biology & botany - Abstract
When more than one closely related plant species share the same pollination niche, reproductive interference via interspecific pollen transfer should limit their coexistence. However, some studies have reported the sympatric coexistence of two native close relatives pollinated by the same pollinators under reproductive interference, even without niche partitioning. We examined the frequency dependency of reproductive interference between close relatives in natural conditions and the potential roles of autonomous selfing in mitigating the negative reproductive interference effects between congeneric species. We investigated sympatrically growing Commelina communis (Cc) and C. c. f. ciliata (Ccfc) populations. These species exhibit very large overlaps in habitat preference, flowering phenology and pollination niche, but seldom produce hybrids. First, we conducted a hand‐pollination experiment to examine the negative effects of heterospecific pollen deposition on seed production and the potential of self‐pollination to mitigate the effects in both species. Then, we examined the effects of reproductive interference on reproductive success and the potential for autonomous selfing in the field. We found significant negative effects of heterospecific pollen deposition on seed production and the mitigation effects of prior and competing self‐pollination, in both Cc and Ccfc. For both species in the field, intraspecific pollinator movements and reproductive success significantly decreased with an increase in the relative floral abundance of competing species, although the negative reproductive interference effect on reproductive success was lower in Cc than in Ccfc. We also found greater potential for prior autonomous selfing in Cc than in Ccfc. Our findings suggest that Cc flowers were less affected by reproductive interference from competing species, which was likely due to a higher prior selfing ability compared to Ccfc flowers. The asymmetry in susceptibility to reproductive interference may explain the Cc‐biased distribution in the study area. The study improves our understanding of how prior autonomous selfing can reduce the negative reproductive interference effect from competing species in mixed‐mating species with frequent pollinator visits. A plain language summary is available for this article.
- Published
- 2019