Search

Background: Three-dimensional measurement of dental morphology is providing new variables and shape information not available previously, and the reliability of these data has proved to be substantial. Accurate superimposition of 2D and 3D data-sets has several applications in dental research when making comparisons of similar structures. For example, two data-sets of the same object can be superimposed to highlight differences apparent in limited region(s) of the tooth crown. When significant regions represented by the two data-sets are identical, registration of the images can be achieved by standard superimposition methods. However, for comparisons of crown morphologies between monozygotic and dizygotic co-twins, the data sets are similar but not identical so a new approach to superimposition has been developed. Aim: To develop a non 'best fit' (Synetic) method for the 3D superimposition of non-similar objects that forms one comparable interface providing enhanced methodology for the analysis of differences within the dentition of twins. Method: A minimised least-squares registration approach is followed by diffusion based registration to provide global minimisation between points that is not based on a best fit algorithm. This process is linear and therefore the method ensures uniqueness of the superimposition. Results: Initial results indicate a reliable method producing only one output as opposed to best fit approaches that may generate a different output each time. Conclusion: Diffusion-based registration offers a more reliable approach to superimposing non-identical objects, such as the tooth crowns of monozygotic co-twins, than conventional best fit methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Two metaphors are presented to highlight concepts that could lead to a paradigm shift in dental studies of twins. The first, derived from the Song of Solomon in the Bible, refers to teeth as being twins. This viewpoint emphasises that each tooth should be viewed as a paired structure, not only with its antimere (within the same arch) but also with its isomer (in the opposing arch). The other metaphor provided by Waddington in 1957 is visual and involves 'an epigenetic landscape' that represents the processes of decision-making by cells during development. It likens the different stages of cellular decision-making to a ball rolling down an undulating landscape of interconnecting hills and valleys. This viewpoint helps to explain how distinct differences in dental phenotypes may arise both within and between monozygotic (MZ) co-twins due to relatively minor temporospatial effects during development. Measurements of maximum mesiodistal diameters of teeth in a pair of MZ twins, using calipers and also cllls2D and 3D imaging systems, have demonstrated that differences in dental crown size occur between antimeric pairs and between corresponding teeth of MZ co-twins. By defining new dental phenotypes that provide more comprehensive descriptions of tooth size and shape, and by drawing on the metaphors described, we are confident of providing new insights into the reasons for observed similarities and differences within, and between, the dentitions of twins. Our approaches will focus on multivariate analyses that take into account the paired arrangement of teeth and also explore epigenetic, as well as genetic and environmental, sources of variation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses various reports on the clinical aspects of dental morphology published within the issue, including one comparing the dental morphology of twins, another on the application of a novel superimposition technique to morphology data derived from measurement of the dental study models of monozygotic co-twins, as well as a report on the modifying effects of the familial genetic contribution in Turner (XO) syndrome.