Oxalate is an ionic form of a potentially toxic oxalic acid that is formed in the human body from a combination of food sources and their absorption in the gastrointestinal tract (approximately 30%), as well as the endogenous synthesis of glyoxylate (40%) and ascorbic acid (30%) (Jonassen et al., 2005; Robijn et al., 2011). The balance of oxalate in the human body is achieved due to its renal (up to 90%) and intestinal (10%) excretion (Robijn et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2020). Loss of kidney function decreases renal oxalate clearance and increases plasma oxalic acid (POx) concentration, according to the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages (Robijn et al., 2011; Perinpam et al., 2017). The accumulation of oxalate may be associated with oxidative stress, inflammation (Khan, 2014; Ermer et al., 2016; Dominguez-Gutierrez et al., 2018; Korol et al., 2021) and a high risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD) (Liu et al., 2014; Fan X et al., 2017; Arafa et al., 2020; Demikhov et al., 2020) in patients with kidney stones. However, although impaired oxalate homeostasis is a well-known occurrence in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD), a high POx concentration has never been considered a trigger for oxidative stress, systemic inflammation, and CVD risk in these patients. In this opinion article, based on the published data and results of our clinical studies, we outlined the possible contribution of oxalate to oxidative stress, chronic inflammation, and CVD risk in patients with ESRD. Gut Microbiota Disruption Causes Hyperoxalemia in Patients With ESRD Given that oxalate is mainly excreted by the kidneys, dialysis seems to be the main approach for oxalate removal in patients with ESRD (Ermer et al., 2017; Perinpam et al., 2017). Nevertheless, despite a homogeneous patient population and a standardized dialysis regimen, the intraindividual predialysis POx concentration level varies from 1.8 mg/L (20 µmol/L) to 5.4 mg/L (60 µmol/L) in different studies (Ermer et al., 2017; Perinpam et al., 2017; Korol et al., 2021). Considering the marginal dependence of oxalate homeostasis on its dietary intake (Mitchell et al., 2019; Kumar et al., 2021) and limited renal excretion in patients with ESRD, it remains unclear why they have significant differences in POx concentration under the same treatment conditions. We hypothesized that in patients with anuria/kidney failure, the gut plays a much more significant role in oxalate handling than in healthy participants. Both paracellular and transcellular intestinal oxalate transport disruption and less functional activity of oxalate-degrading bacteria (ODB) in fecal microbiota might be the main factors affecting oxalate homeostasis in patients on dialysis. The gastrointestinal tract plays a complex role in oxalate metabolism via intestinal oxalate transport and the ability of ODB to degrade oxalate (Hatch and Freel, 2008; Robijn et al., 2011; Huang et al., 2020; Ticinesi et al., 2020). Oxalate is absorbed from all parts of the gastrointestinal tract through paracellular (predominantly passive) and active transcellular mechanisms (Robijn et al., 2011; Ticinesi et al., 2020). The relative contribution of these two transport mechanisms varies with the intestinal segment and its condition (Hatch and Freel, 2008; Robijn et al., 2011; Whittamore and Hatch, 2017). Paracellular transport depends on the residence time of the chyme in the small intestine and the degree of calcium ionization (Hatch and Freel, 2008; Robijn et al., 2011; Whittamore and Hatch, 2017). The active transcellular oxalate flux is derived from anion exchange proteins belonging to the multifunctional SLC26 gene family. One of the gene family members, Slc26a6, is expressed at high levels in the intestine and proximal renal tubules and plays a major role in controlling systemic oxalate metabolism (Whittamore and Hatch, 2017). Oxalobacter formigenes produce a small protein that directly induces oxalate transport via the oxalate transporter SLC26A6–dependent mechanism in intestinal Caco-2 cells (Arvans et al., 2017). Among oxalate transporters, many factors are involved in determining oxalate absorption and secretion in the gut in patients with ESRD: 1) dietary restriction; 2) high uremic toxin concentration; 3) malabsorption; 4) low blood concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and fiber that may affect the oxalate absorption; 5) use of antibiotics, phosphate binders, or other medications that can influence the quantitative and qualitative composition of gut microbiota; and 6) oxalate-degrading activity (ODA) of gut microbiota (Robijn et al., 2011; Mitchell et al., 2019; Ticinesi et al., 2020). Gut microbiota is a critical factor affecting intestinal oxalate metabolism and kidney stone formation (Stepanova et al., 2018; Chen et al., 2019; Ticinesi et al., 2020). O. formigenes degrade oxalate in the intestine and stimulate its endogenous secretion (Hatch et al., 2006; Arvans et al., 2017). However, the absence of intestinal O. formigenes colonization may not be the only cause for kidney stones, and a diversity of gut ODB (e.g., Lactobacillus spp., Bifidobacterium spp., Bacillus spp., E. faecalis, N. albigula) were identified (Gomathi et al., 2014; Barnett et al., 2016; Miller et al., 2019; Stepanova et al., 2021). Since the gut microbiota in patients on dialysis is characterized by increased Enterobacteriaceae and low colonization of Bifidobacterium and Lactobacillus species compared with normal controls (Hu et al., 2020; Ren et al., 2020), the low abundance of ODB in gut microbiota may play a significant role in oxalate homeostasis in patients with ESRD. Indeed, we previously demonstrated that the ODB number in patients on dialysis was significantly lower than in healthy volunteers (Stepanova et al., 2020a; Stepanova et al., 2021). However, when we separately evaluated the ODB number and their total ODA in fecal microbiota in patients on dialysis, we got surprising results. The ODB number was associated neither with their total ODA in fecal microbiota nor urinary oxalate (UOx) excretion and POx concentration. According to the results, only total fecal ODA was associated with urine and plasma oxalate levels: the lower the ODA in the fecal microbiota, the higher the POx concentration and the lower the UOx excretion. Thus, total ODA in the fecal microbiota rather than the ODB number resulted in elevation of plasma and urine oxalate concentrations in patients with ESRD.