Search

BackgroundA causal connection between oxidative stress and inflammation in diabetes, along with its associated renal and cardiovascular complications, has been established. Sixteen prescribed potentially renoprotective Chinese herbal medicines for diabetic kidney disease (PRCHMDKD), which are scientific Chinese medicine (botanical drug) and categorized into five classes (clearing heat, nourishing yin, dampness dispelling, tonifying qi, and harmonizing formulas), exhibit shared antioxidative properties and target multiple oxidative stress pathways. However, the time-response, cumulative effects, and safety (hyperkalemia risk) of these sixteen PRCHMDKD on cardiorenal and survival outcomes in patients with overall and advanced DKD remain unresolved.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed national health insurance claims data in 2000–2017. Four statistical methods, including Cox proportional hazards models, complementary restricted mean survival time (RMST), propensity score matching, and competing risk analysis for end-stage renal disease (ESRD), were employed to investigate this relationship. The study included 43,480 PRCHMDKD users and an equal number of matched nonusers within the overall DKD patient population. For advanced DKD patients, the cohort comprised 1,422 PRCHMDKD users and an equivalent number of matched nonusers.ResultsPRCHMDKD use in overall and advanced, respectively, DKD patients was associated with time-dependent reductions in adjusted hazard ratios for ESRD (0.66; 95% CI, 0.61–0.70 vs. 0.81; 0.65–0.99), all-cause mortality (0.48; 0.47–0.49 vs. 0.59; 0.50–0.70), and cardiovascular mortality (0.50; 0.48–0.53 vs. 0.61; 0.45–0.82). Significant differences in RMST were observed in overall and advanced, respectively, DKD patients, favoring PRCHMDKD use: 0.31 years (95% CI, 0.24–0.38) vs. 0.61 years (0.13–1.10) for ESRD, 2.71 years (2.60–2.82) vs. 1.50 years (1.03–1.98) for all-cause mortality, and 1.18 years (1.09–1.28) vs. 0.59 years (0.22–0.95) for cardiovascular mortality. Additionally, hyperkalemia risk did not increase. These findings remained consistent despite multiple sensitivity analyses. Notably, the cumulative effects of utilizing at least four or five classes and multiple botanical drugs from the sixteen PRCHMDKD provided enhanced renoprotection for patients with both overall and advanced DKD. This suggests that there is involvement of multiple targets within the oxidative stress pathways associated with DKD.ConclusionThis real-world study suggests that using these sixteen PRCHMDKD provides time-dependent cardiorenal and survival benefits while ensuring safety for DKD patients.

Background: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) significantly links to LN, a type of CKD with high mortality despite modern Western treatments. About 70% of SLE patients develop LN, and 30% advance to end-stage renal disease (ESRD). Concerns about glucocorticoid side effects and LN worsening due to oxidative stress prompt alternative treatment searches. In Taiwan, over 85% of SLE patients opt for complementary methods, especially Chinese herbal medicine (CHM). We pinpointed seventeen CHMs for SLE (PRCHMSLE) with antioxidative and anti-inflammatory properties from national health insurance data (2000–2017). Our primary aim was to assess their impact on renal and survival outcomes in SLE patients progressing to CKD (SLE-CKD), with a secondary focus on the risks of hospitalization and hyperkalemia.Methods: We established a propensity-matched cohort of 1,188 patients with SLE-CKD, comprising 594 PRCHMSLE users and 594 nonusers. We employed Cox proportional hazards models and restricted mean survival time (RMST) analyses to assess the renal and survival outcomes of PRCHMSLE users. Moreover, we performed pooling and network analyses, specifically focusing on the renal effects linked to PRCHMSLE.Results: PRCHMSLE use was associated with decreased adjusted hazard ratios for ESRD (0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.25–0.79, p = 0.006), all-cause mortality (0.56; 0.43–0.75, p < 0.0001), non-cardiovascular mortality (0.56; 0.42–0.75, p < 0.0001), and hospitalization (0.72; 0.52–0.96, p = 0.009). Hyperkalemia risk did not increase. Significant differences in RMST were observed: 0.57 years (95% confidence interval, 0.19–0.95, p = 0.004) for ESRD, 1.22 years (0.63–1.82, p < 0.0001) for all-cause mortality, and 1.21 years (0.62–1.80, p < 0.0001) for non-cardiovascular mortality, favoring PRCHMSLE use. Notably renoprotective PRCHMSLE included Gan-Lu-Ying, Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge [Asparagaceae; Rhizoma Anemarrhenae] (Zhi-Mu), Rehmannia glutinosa (Gaertn.) DC. [Orobanchaceae; Radix Rehmanniae] (Sheng-Di-Huang), Jia-Wei-Xiao-Yao-San, and Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. [Paeoniaceae; Cortex Moutan] (Mu-Dan-Pi). Network analysis highlighted primary treatment strategies with central components like Liu-Wei-Di-Huang-Wan, Paeonia suffruticosa Andr. [Paeoniaceae; Cortex Moutan] (Mu-Dan-Pi), Anemarrhena asphodeloides Bunge [Asparagaceae; Rhizoma Anemarrhenae] (Zhi-Mu), Rehmannia glutinosa (Gaertn.) DC. [Orobanchaceae; Radix Rehmanniae] (Sheng-Di-Huang), and Zhi-Bai-Di-Huang-Wan.Conclusion: This work underscores the pronounced renal and survival benefits associated with the seventeen PRCHMSLE in the treatment of SLE-CKD, concurrently mitigating the risks of hospitalization and hyperkalemia. This highlights their potential as alternative treatment options for individuals with this condition.

Background: Based on their anti-oxidative and anti-fibrotic properties, Angelica sinensis (Oliv.) Diels roots [Apiaceae; Radix Angelicae sinensis] (Danggui [abbreviated as S in the context]), Astragalus membranaceus (Fisch.) Bunge [Fabaceae; Astragalus membranaceus] (Huangqi [A]), Rheum palmatum L. [Polygonaceae; Rheum palmatum] (Dahuang [R]), and Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge [Lamiaceae; Salvia miltiorrhiza Bunge radix et rhizoma] (Danshen [D]) are potential renoprotective Chinese herbal medicines (CHMs). Renoprotection using ARD alone for the treatment of chronic kidney disease (CKD) has been documented in pre-clinical, clinical, and meta-analysis research; however, only pre-clinical data are available for the use of S alone. Moreover, with an increasing number of CKD patients taking prescribed CHMs, hyperkalemia risk remains unclear.Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed national health insurance claims data in 2001–2017. Propensity score matching was used to analyze renal and survival outcomes and the dose-response effects of S without ARD use in 18,348 new S users, 9,174 new ARD users, and 36,696 non-users. Cox proportional hazard regression was used to investigate adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for end-stage renal disease (ESRD) in the presence of competing mortality and death. The additive effect of the S herb in single form to compounds was also analyzed. Additionally, to analyze hyperkalemia risk, an exact match on each covariate was used to include 42,265 new CHM users and non-users, while Poisson regression was used to estimate adjusted incidence rate ratios (aIRRs) of hyperkalemia of prescribed CHMs.Results: S users and ARD users were associated with aHRs of 0.77 (95% confidence interval; 0.69–0.86) and 1.04 (0.91–1.19), respectively, for ESRD and 0.55 (0.53–0.57) and 0.71 (0.67–0.75), respectively, for death. The renal and survival benefits of S use were consistent in several sensitivity analyses. The dose- and time-dependent renoprotection and dose-dependent survival benefits were observed for S use. The top two additive renoprotective collocations of the S herb in compounds were Xue-Fu-Zhu-Yu-Tang and Shen-Tong-Zhu-Yu-Tang, followed by Shu-Jing-Huo-Xue-Tang and Shen-Tong-Zhu-Yu-Tang. Moreover, CHM users were associated with aIRRs of 0.34 (0.31–0.37) for hyperkalemia.Conclusion: This study suggests dose- and time-dependent renoprotection and dose-dependent survival benefits of the S herb in compounds and no increased hyperkalemia risk of the prescribed CHMs in CKD patients.